System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For B550, we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1909 update.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The B550D4-4L performs very well in our power consumption testing, which can be attributed to the lack of controllers onboard in comparison to other B550 models tested. Despite being a commercial-focused motherboard, it includes support for Precision Boost Overdrive on Ryzen processors, which from our test at full-load is clearly visible. 

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our non-UEFI POST time testing, the ASRock did well, considering professional boards tend to take much longer to POST into Windows. The first time we POSTed up the board, it did take considerably longer due to the BMC, but even at the default setting and when stripped of non-essential controllers, there wasn't much difference in POST times.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test DPC latency with default settings straight out of the box, and as our graph shows, the ASRock isn't close to being competitive with other models we've tested. The B550D4-4L also doesn't include integrated audio, so users looking to build an audio workstation will need to rely on external audio controllers.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

73 Comments

View All Comments

  • bill.rookard - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Well that all should mean that (for example) if the board supported my Ryzen 1700, that it also would allow for ECC RAM? I know it doesn't support the 1700, curious to see if it would support my Ryzen 1600 (AF stepping)
  • mode_13h - Friday, May 21, 2021 - link

    > curious to see if it would support my Ryzen 1600 (AF stepping)

    No way. I can already guess it won't support anything older than Ryzen 3000-series, but the CPU-support list is here:

    https://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.a...
  • domboy - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    I don't understand why more motherboards don't have the memory slots setup this way. Most cases I see for sale have airflow from front to rear so would benefit a memory slot setup like this board has. Maybe I'm missing something...
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    I dot know tons of stuff about servers but why arent there basically any VRM heatsink? just not nessacary because of no oc? but wouldn't you want better power delivery and in return, lower VRM temps for stability anyway?
  • bill.rookard - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Not necessary really. IIRC they're rated at a pretty high temp usually (100+C) and as long as they have some airflow they're fine and usually servers have some pretty good sideways airflow going on. If you're going to OC - then yes you're going to run the VRMs hard and should have a heatsink, but in this application there's no OC facility.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    No OC is most of it. When running within their power limts Ryzen chips are very efficient, and the VRMs are jsut not going to get that hot. Even boards with sub par VRMs only put out 4-5 watts of heat at full load with a 95 watt CPU.

    Given these boards are usually put into either server style chassis with tons of airflow or have top down coolers that will blow onto the VRMs temps should be fine.
  • mode_13h - Friday, May 21, 2021 - link

    I see a heatsink both in front and in back of the CPU socket. What are those, then?
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Monday, May 24, 2021 - link

    yes, but they are basically nothing that's why I said "but why aren't there basically any VRM heatsink?" not why arent there VRM heatsink/Heatsinks.
  • docbones - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    Weird board. Would have also expected 10gb ethernet and also many more Sata ports.
  • Cooe - Thursday, May 20, 2021 - link

    "Users with Ryzen desktop processors can only use non-ECC DDR4, while users with Ryzen Pro models with Radeon Graphics and PRO technologies can use ECC memory."

    Uhh.. ECC memory works just fine with bog standard (aka "not Pro") Ryzen CPU's and has LITERALLY since their launch in 2017.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now