Final Words

In late 2019, when Microsoft launched the Surface Laptop 3 – their first AMD-powered Surface laptop – it was an important moment for both AMD and Microsoft's Surface group. AMD finally had a premium design win, and what better manufacturer did they have to work with than Microsoft themselves. Tweaks to improve performance and battery life could be easily replicated across all Windows PCs, which was a big help for AMD at the time. At the end of the day Microsoft's help still wasn't enough to make the AMD Ryzen 3000-based Surface Laptop 3 a bona fide winner –  it performed worse than the Intel Ice Lake model and suffered from poor battery life – but it put AMD and Microsoft on the path towards building bigger and better laptops later on.

And now with the Surface Laptop 4 and the Ryzen 4000 APUs, Microsoft and AMD have resolved many (if not most) of the issues that dogged their earlier laptop. In fact, the Surface Laptop 4 is easily the best Ryzen 4000 laptop on the market. Microsoft has worked with AMD to deliver unique processors for the Surface Laptop 4 which are the strongest Renoir-U chips you can get. The increased frequency, coupled with eight cores and sixteen threads, makes for a very capable notebook computer.

And, unlike the Picasso-powered Surface Laptop 3, the AMD choice not only closes the gap in terms of battery life, according to Microsoft, the AMD model even surpasses the Tiger Lake model. Although we have not tested the Tiger Lake Surface Laptop 4 (yet?), the results from this Ryzen 7 model are excellent. Even with the 15-inch, 201 pixels-per-inch display, the Surface Laptop 4 was able to go toe-to-toe with some of the best designs on the market which have smaller displays. That is impressive.

Speaking of impressive, Microsoft’s attention to detail on the display really sets all Surface devices apart from the rest of the manufacturers. With any Surface device you purchase, from the least expensive, to the most expensive, the display accuracy is some of the best in the industry. The 3:2 aspect ratio is always a treat to use in any productivity task. The 201 pixels-per-inch makes the display sharp, and while a bit more contrast ratio would be appreciated, overall, this is an excellent implementation. It even includes a pen digitizer and touch support.

System performance with the Ryzen 7 4980U was excellent. Offering up sixteen threads, the Surface Laptop 4 gobbled up any multi-threaded task thrown at it. The Vega 8 graphics, while not class-leading, are still very strong for an integrated solution. Perhaps one area where the AMD model is let down though is that Microsoft only lets you configure it up to 16 GB of memory, whereas the Tiger Lake powered model has up to 32 GB as a maximum. This is an odd decision and will hopefully be addressed during the device’s lifetime.

Less impressive were the storage results on this review unit, which were some of the lowest we've seen for an NVMe drive in an OEM laptop. But the good news is that Microsoft has committed to utilizing M.2 storage on Surface again, after a brief stint of employed soldered in BGA storage. Customers will be able to replace the drive if it fails, or upgrade it. After years of making some of the most challenging to repair devices, Microsoft has turned a corner somewhat on repairability, with a new design that is easier to get into, and actually has some replaceable components.

With two sizes, a choice of colors, and even keyboard materials, there is a lot to like here. Microsoft offers a single USB Type-A, as well as a single USB Type-C, and additional expansion options through the Surface Connect port. This is not a workstation by any means, but it is nice to have both ports and not need to use dongles for Type-A devices.

Otherwise, although there was a bit of disappointment to see the Surface Laptop announced with the Ryzen 4000 series processors in 2021 instead of AMD's latest 5000 series processors, I believe those feelings can be set aside. There is little doubt that a Ryzen 5000 version of this laptop would be even more powerful with its Zen 3 cores, but Microsoft’s semi-custom Ryzen 7 4980U still performs very well, and should put any of those thoughts to bed. The Surface Laptop design is also mostly unchanged for the last several generations, and it could use a refresh, but that being said, the design was never really a hindrance before, and it is still pleasing to use today.

It is amazing what a generational improvement can do. The Surface Laptop 4 achieves great performance, and great battery life, and does so all in a pleasing package, with a great display, fantastic keyboard, smooth trackpad, and a thin and light design. On the outside, it would be hard to tell it apart from the Surface Laptop 3, but it’s what’s on the inside that counts. This refreshed model is just what the Surface Laptop needed.

 
Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • eva02langley - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Seriously... MS... I was going to buy one if you were using Zen 3... but you are using Zen 2... WTH is wrong with you! Zen 2 was for last year!
  • Alistair - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Well, Ryzen 5500 and 5700 are also Zen 2 based, so just think of the Surface laptop as being a Ryzen 5700U. I don't know why they didn't just call it the 5750U or something.
  • sbcui - Friday, May 7, 2021 - link

    I believe AMD said while the 5500U and 5700U are Zen 2 based, they have separate voltage control for each core instead of a single voltage applied to all cores(which could translate to energy savings and better battery life). I guess that the 4980U may not have that capability and that could be a reason they're not calling it a 5750U.
  • tipoo - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Could we get a short comparison to M1?
  • eva02langley - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Battery life is about the same... while the AMD take is on 7nm... while the M1 is on 5nm with ARM cores. It is saying a lot. When it comes to performances, Zen 2 is behind the M1 in ST, but MT performance is a bloodbath.

    A 5800u would have trashed the M1 entirely with better battery life. It is a missed opportunity. Now I need to find something similar hosting a 5800u...

    Not to mention the display is way better on the surface.
  • Alistair - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Actually look up some info next time. "but MT is a bloodbath", no, a quick YouTube comparison check shows the M1 is only 7 percent slower than the AMD Surface in MT in Cinebench R23. When did "bloodbath" mean 7 percent.
  • Alistair - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    And don't forget the M1's integrated GPU is a bloodbath vs. Intel or AMD right now, especially on battery power.
  • Dug - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Just to be clear for people that don't understand your comment, M1 outpaces other laptops that aren't plugged into a power source by a very large margin.
  • Ppietra - Friday, May 7, 2021 - link

    Battery life is about the same???
    It isn’t! The M1 MacBook consumes way less... Don’t confuse battery life while watching videos with actual work!
  • Alistair - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    My top pick for a cheap laptop right now that is almost as good as the Surface is the Asus Zen OLED. $750 USD for the Ryzen 5500U model. But this Surface 4 AMD model has me intrigued, even if I'd prefer to have a second USB A port.

    Maybe I missed it in the review, but does the USB-C port support Display Port alt mode? Please?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now