Gaming Tests: Red Dead Redemption 2

It’s great to have another Rockstar benchmark in the mix, and the launch of Red Dead Redemption 2 (RDR2) on the PC gives us a chance to do that. Building on the success of the original RDR, the second incarnation came to Steam in December 2019 having been released on consoles first. The PC version takes the open-world cowboy genre into the start of the modern age, with a wide array of impressive graphics and features that are eerily close to reality.

For RDR2, Rockstar kept the same benchmark philosophy as with Grand Theft Auto V, with the benchmark consisting of several cut scenes with different weather and lighting effects, with a final scene focusing on an on-rails environment, only this time with mugging a shop leading to a shootout on horseback before riding over a bridge into the great unknown. Luckily most of the command line options from GTA V are present here, and the game also supports resolution scaling. We have the following tests:

  • 384p Minimum, 1440p Minimum, 8K Minimum, 1080p Max

For that 8K setting, I originally thought I had the settings file at 4K and 1.0x scaling, but it was actually set at 2.0x giving that 8K.  For the sake of it, I decided to keep the 8K settings.

For our results, we run through each resolution and setting configuration for a minimum of 10 minutes, before averaging and parsing the frame time data.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS
95th Percentile

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Gaming Tests: Grand Theft Auto V Gaming Tests: Strange Brigade
Comments Locked

210 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    I don't think ANYONE actually wants to see the numbers for these chips at 65W :)
  • Spunjji - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    I love a good laugh!
  • iAPX - Saturday, January 23, 2021 - link

    I totally agree, a 5600X and a 10700 on their 65W TDP, and their maximum performance, to gives a baseline of what performance-level is WARRANTED by their makers.
  • etal2 - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    Setting the limits in the bios is very nice and all but without the voltage regulation and thermal capacity they can not sustain this performance for very long regardless of the numbers set.

    I very much doubt that on the 60$ cheap 4 phase vrm boards the manufacturers set the limits very high, they will get fried boards within the warranty period and we know very well they can't have that.
  • Spunjji - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    That would be nice to see. Perhaps an article showing which of a representative selection of processors provide the best performance at a given set of fairly common power levels (65W / 95W / 125W).

    Something for when Dr Cutress finds himself with infinite time and no impending deadlines 😅
  • u.of.ipod - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    So happy I waited patiently and got a Ryzen 5600x for my small form factor system. The fact it can hang with the i7's and only consumes 1/3 the peak power draw is great for heat output and playing nicely with SFX PSUs.
  • Golgatha777 - Thursday, January 21, 2021 - link

    And that's how you end up with graphs like this one.

    https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/i9W8M8HgGaTqRs4b...
  • Spunjji - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    Oof.
  • Samus - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    Oof.
  • magreen - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    Pentium 4 Extreme Edition all over again

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now