Conclusion: Entry Level QLC

The Corsair MP400 has proved to be a competent budget NVMe SSD in its 1TB version. The recent crop of drives like the Corsair MP400 and Sabrent Rocket has raised the bar for consumer QLC SSDs. That being said, the a 1TB QLC drive is relatively low capacity for the controller, and there are performance compromises that go along with that (compared to the 8TB relatives we looked at last week). At mainstream capacities they can compete against many budget TLC SSDs, and at the higher capacities where there are few or no budget TLC options, many of the benefits of QLC NAND come into play.

The MP400 sits on the boundary between a good TLC drive and an entry level QLC drive. It performs as expected, and the key arbiter in going for this drive is going to be in the cost.

When Does QLC Make Sense? An Overview

Based on our testing, QLC drive capacities below 1TB (such as 500 GB), we recommend avoiding QLC SSDs. These smaller capacities are where DRAMless TLC SSDs are clearly the better value, and more mainstream TLC drives with DRAM are often on sale for entry-level prices as well. Above 1TB, the DRAMless TLC options are few and far between, and we don't expect any of them to handle heavier workloads as easily as 2+TB QLC drives with DRAM do.

At the 1TB capacity point we're focused on today, the conclusion is not as clear. The Corsair MP400 generally outperformed the low-end TLC drives we have to compare against, though our collection is missing a few of the best-performing budget TLC options on the market today. It is pretty clear that DRAMless TLC SSDs have the edge in power efficiency.

For general purpose consumer desktop usage, both QLC and TLC entry-level NVMe drives offer better performance than SATA SSDs, and with little or no price premium. Which kind of entry-level NVMe drive is the better really comes down to day to day pricing.

Budget NVMe Consumer SSD Price Comparison
December 11, 2020
  PCIe
DRAM
NAND 500GB 1TB 2TB 4TB 8TB
NVMe PCIe 3.0
ADATA XPG SX8100 3.0 x4
Yes
TLC
8ch
$59.99 (12¢/GB) $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$229.99 (11¢/GB) $499.99 (12¢/GB) -
ADATA Swordfish 3.0 x4
No
TLC
4ch
$54.99 (11¢/GB) $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$189.99 (9¢/GB) - -
Corsair MP400 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $114.99 (11¢/GB) $244.99 (12¢/GB) $662.00 (17¢/GB) $1498.00 (19¢/GB)
Inland Platinum 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$193.99 (10¢/GB) $499.99 (12¢/GB) -
Intel 660p 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
4ch
$59.99 (12¢/GB) $109.99 (11¢/GB) $209.99 (10¢/GB) - -
Intel 665p 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
4ch
- $109.99 (11¢/GB) $239.99 (12¢/GB) - -
Kingston A2000 3.0 x4
Yes
TLC
4ch
$53.99 (11¢/GB) $102.99 (10¢/GB) - - -
Mushkin ALPHA 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- - - $599.99 (15¢/GB) $1299.99 (16¢/GB)
Mushkin Helix-L 3.0 x4
No
TLC
4ch
$54.99 (11¢/GB) $89.99
(9¢/GB)
- - -
Sabrent Rocket Q 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
$64.99 (13¢/GB) $109.98 (11¢/GB) $219.98 (11¢/GB) $599.98 (15¢/GB) $1299.99 (16¢/GB)
WD Blue SN550 3.0 x4
No
TLC
8ch
$53.99 (11¢/GB) $104.99 (10¢/GB) $247.99 (12¢/GB) - -
NVMe PCIe 4.0
Sabrent Rocket Q 4.0 4.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $149.98 (15¢/GB) $319.99 (16¢/GB) $689.98 (17¢/GB) -
Addlink S92 4.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $145.88 (15¢/GB) $277.88 (14¢/GB) $649.99 (16¢/GB) -
SATA
Samsung 870 QVO SATA
Yes
QLC - $89.99
(9¢/GB)
$199.99 (10¢/GB) $419.99 (10¢/GB) $861.27 (11¢/GB)

The handful of multi-TB QLC drives using the Phison E12S controller are competing not just on price, but on the vendor's ability to keep the drive in stock. From day to day, we're seeing the best-priced models quickly end up backordered, so there's clearly demand for these massive SSDs but the prices should drift downward a bit as these drives become more widely available from multiple brands. The Corsair MP400 hasn't been on the market for as long as the Sabrent Rocket Q, so the latter currently has it beat on pricing and availability. Microcenter's Inland Platinum QLC drive seems to still be the cheapest Phison E12S+QLC drive on the market, with especially attractive pricing for the 4TB model.

Even though the proliferation of new QLC alternatives has broadened the scope of the entry-level NVMe market segment, these drives are still almost always overshadowed by the best deals in the more mainstream NVMe market segment that is dominated by drives with TLC and DRAM and 8-channel controllers. Right now with holiday pricing, it is very easy to score a drive that doesn't have any of the acute weaknesses of DRAMless or QLC models, without paying a premium. The best example is ADATA's XPG SX8100, a TLC drive with Realtek's 8-channel controller with DRAM. The SX8100 is one of the few TLC models with a 4TB option so it competes against high-capacity QLC models, and beats many of them on price at all capacity points.

Our next look into consumer QLC SSDs will be Sabrent's Rocket Q4, the successor to the Rocket Q that adopts the Phison E16 PCIe 4.0 controller. Even though the newer Phison E18 Gen4 controller is starting to ship in high-end SSDs, The E18 is probably overkill for QLC models, and it's certainly more expensive. The E16 controller may stick around for a while to offer a more affordable path toward better QLC performance.

Next Review: SSD Benchmark Suite Update for PCIe Gen 4

This review marks the end of our current generation of SSD testing equipment and procedures. Our new overhauled test suite designed for PCIe Gen4 SSDs will be launching soon, along with a new section in Bench for the new test results. The existing SSD18 results will remain available with no further updates. Many recent drives we have already reviewed will be re-tested on our new SSD test suite and their results will be added to the new SSD21 section as they are completed.

 
Mixed Read/Write Performance And Power Management
Comments Locked

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, December 15, 2020 - link

    My mistake! Made a blunder here. LBAs written (241) are the host/OS writes. Well, I can't seem to find SMART value 249 (NAND writes). Cunning work by Samsung, not exposing that value.

    Is where "Wear Leveling Count" the one to use with the P/E cycles? Mine is at 5. Calculating 5 / 2,000 (for TLC, roughly) doesn't seem to yield a sensible value, against the drive's TBW and the OS writes. I'm stumped.
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, December 15, 2020 - link

    Another AT article helped here. Seems to be that 1 P/E cycle equals the capacity of the drive in NAND writes, roughly; and the raw Wear Levelling Count equates to used P/E cycles.

    Roughly: Raw WLC x drive capacity == NAND writes

    For me, I get: 5 x 500 == 2,500 GB

    I'm scratching my head though because that yields a write amplification that seems erroneously small, only 1.09x (2,500 nand / 2,300 host).

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/8239/update-on-sams...
  • MDD1963 - Sunday, December 13, 2020 - link

    'only 200 TBW'...based on my 10 TB per year as a 4 hours per day 'ordinary desktop user/surfer', the drive would be ending it's life in writes at merely 20 years for me... Best to shop elsewhere! :)
  • nucc1 - Wednesday, December 16, 2020 - link

    I just looked at the SMART data for my solid state devices, and I'm averaging 0.03 TB per day. over 660 (total power on) days on my oldest SSD. According to Aida64, the drive still has about 95% remaining lifetime. It's a Samsung Sata 850 EVO 500GB.

    I like to think I'm not an average user, because this machine is running boinc always, and I use these SSDs for running virtual machines whose lifetime is typically less than 90 days each and, I'm also hosting a media server on this machine for in-home streaming.

    I used to worry about longevity too, thinking myself to be a heavy user, but the numbers have not borne this suspicion out.

    My current OS boot drive, with bitlocker ON is a sabrent 1TB nvme device, currently averaging 0.022 TB written per day over it's 160 day lifetime, and 99% lifetime remaining. If endurance is the only thing that kills these drives, I have many years of worry-free operation left in all these budget, consumer drives packed into my system.
  • shabby - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Go home corsair, you're drunk...
    You guys should stop accepting these overpriced qlc junk drives for review.
  • boozed - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Why, so we'll never know how they perform?
  • shabby - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    We don't need to know how they perform, just their price, we know they all perform like shit.
  • Maverick009 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Not exactly true. QLC drives are still a step up from mechanical drives in certain case scenarios, and depending on the pairing of the controller, can even come close or on par with some of their counterparts.

    Rather have choice with competition rather then your narrow sight of vision as not every drive is built the same.
  • Gigaplex - Wednesday, December 16, 2020 - link

    And then when a QLC drive comes out that's actually good, we'd never know...
  • kpb321 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Price is always where the QLC drives have failed for me. As the article notes it is usually pretty easy to find an 8 channel with dram drive for minimal price premium over one of the QLC drives. Not to mention the other low cost variants with 4 channels and/or dramless that are almost always available at similar price points and while they might have some compromises also compared the better drives they are usually smaller compromises and easier to accept. I just don't see the QLC drive providing the value if there are TLC alternatives available.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now