Conclusion: Entry Level QLC

The Corsair MP400 has proved to be a competent budget NVMe SSD in its 1TB version. The recent crop of drives like the Corsair MP400 and Sabrent Rocket has raised the bar for consumer QLC SSDs. That being said, the a 1TB QLC drive is relatively low capacity for the controller, and there are performance compromises that go along with that (compared to the 8TB relatives we looked at last week). At mainstream capacities they can compete against many budget TLC SSDs, and at the higher capacities where there are few or no budget TLC options, many of the benefits of QLC NAND come into play.

The MP400 sits on the boundary between a good TLC drive and an entry level QLC drive. It performs as expected, and the key arbiter in going for this drive is going to be in the cost.

When Does QLC Make Sense? An Overview

Based on our testing, QLC drive capacities below 1TB (such as 500 GB), we recommend avoiding QLC SSDs. These smaller capacities are where DRAMless TLC SSDs are clearly the better value, and more mainstream TLC drives with DRAM are often on sale for entry-level prices as well. Above 1TB, the DRAMless TLC options are few and far between, and we don't expect any of them to handle heavier workloads as easily as 2+TB QLC drives with DRAM do.

At the 1TB capacity point we're focused on today, the conclusion is not as clear. The Corsair MP400 generally outperformed the low-end TLC drives we have to compare against, though our collection is missing a few of the best-performing budget TLC options on the market today. It is pretty clear that DRAMless TLC SSDs have the edge in power efficiency.

For general purpose consumer desktop usage, both QLC and TLC entry-level NVMe drives offer better performance than SATA SSDs, and with little or no price premium. Which kind of entry-level NVMe drive is the better really comes down to day to day pricing.

Budget NVMe Consumer SSD Price Comparison
December 11, 2020
  PCIe
DRAM
NAND 500GB 1TB 2TB 4TB 8TB
NVMe PCIe 3.0
ADATA XPG SX8100 3.0 x4
Yes
TLC
8ch
$59.99 (12¢/GB) $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$229.99 (11¢/GB) $499.99 (12¢/GB) -
ADATA Swordfish 3.0 x4
No
TLC
4ch
$54.99 (11¢/GB) $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$189.99 (9¢/GB) - -
Corsair MP400 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $114.99 (11¢/GB) $244.99 (12¢/GB) $662.00 (17¢/GB) $1498.00 (19¢/GB)
Inland Platinum 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $94.99
(9¢/GB)
$193.99 (10¢/GB) $499.99 (12¢/GB) -
Intel 660p 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
4ch
$59.99 (12¢/GB) $109.99 (11¢/GB) $209.99 (10¢/GB) - -
Intel 665p 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
4ch
- $109.99 (11¢/GB) $239.99 (12¢/GB) - -
Kingston A2000 3.0 x4
Yes
TLC
4ch
$53.99 (11¢/GB) $102.99 (10¢/GB) - - -
Mushkin ALPHA 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- - - $599.99 (15¢/GB) $1299.99 (16¢/GB)
Mushkin Helix-L 3.0 x4
No
TLC
4ch
$54.99 (11¢/GB) $89.99
(9¢/GB)
- - -
Sabrent Rocket Q 3.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
$64.99 (13¢/GB) $109.98 (11¢/GB) $219.98 (11¢/GB) $599.98 (15¢/GB) $1299.99 (16¢/GB)
WD Blue SN550 3.0 x4
No
TLC
8ch
$53.99 (11¢/GB) $104.99 (10¢/GB) $247.99 (12¢/GB) - -
NVMe PCIe 4.0
Sabrent Rocket Q 4.0 4.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $149.98 (15¢/GB) $319.99 (16¢/GB) $689.98 (17¢/GB) -
Addlink S92 4.0 x4
Yes
QLC
8ch
- $145.88 (15¢/GB) $277.88 (14¢/GB) $649.99 (16¢/GB) -
SATA
Samsung 870 QVO SATA
Yes
QLC - $89.99
(9¢/GB)
$199.99 (10¢/GB) $419.99 (10¢/GB) $861.27 (11¢/GB)

The handful of multi-TB QLC drives using the Phison E12S controller are competing not just on price, but on the vendor's ability to keep the drive in stock. From day to day, we're seeing the best-priced models quickly end up backordered, so there's clearly demand for these massive SSDs but the prices should drift downward a bit as these drives become more widely available from multiple brands. The Corsair MP400 hasn't been on the market for as long as the Sabrent Rocket Q, so the latter currently has it beat on pricing and availability. Microcenter's Inland Platinum QLC drive seems to still be the cheapest Phison E12S+QLC drive on the market, with especially attractive pricing for the 4TB model.

Even though the proliferation of new QLC alternatives has broadened the scope of the entry-level NVMe market segment, these drives are still almost always overshadowed by the best deals in the more mainstream NVMe market segment that is dominated by drives with TLC and DRAM and 8-channel controllers. Right now with holiday pricing, it is very easy to score a drive that doesn't have any of the acute weaknesses of DRAMless or QLC models, without paying a premium. The best example is ADATA's XPG SX8100, a TLC drive with Realtek's 8-channel controller with DRAM. The SX8100 is one of the few TLC models with a 4TB option so it competes against high-capacity QLC models, and beats many of them on price at all capacity points.

Our next look into consumer QLC SSDs will be Sabrent's Rocket Q4, the successor to the Rocket Q that adopts the Phison E16 PCIe 4.0 controller. Even though the newer Phison E18 Gen4 controller is starting to ship in high-end SSDs, The E18 is probably overkill for QLC models, and it's certainly more expensive. The E16 controller may stick around for a while to offer a more affordable path toward better QLC performance.

Next Review: SSD Benchmark Suite Update for PCIe Gen 4

This review marks the end of our current generation of SSD testing equipment and procedures. Our new overhauled test suite designed for PCIe Gen4 SSDs will be launching soon, along with a new section in Bench for the new test results. The existing SSD18 results will remain available with no further updates. Many recent drives we have already reviewed will be re-tested on our new SSD test suite and their results will be added to the new SSD21 section as they are completed.

 
Mixed Read/Write Performance And Power Management
Comments Locked

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Monday, December 14, 2020 - link

    Yes, the drive is absolutely fine for its intended use case and completely inappropriate when used in ways which were not intended (and where its performance would be miserable anyway). 🥱

    In terms of my usage, for example, it's less "almost disposable" and more "extremely unlikely to wear out before it becomes useless in what will be my current system 10-15 years from now".
  • zdz - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    Don't need to look at Samsung. Corsair MP500 1 TB (previous generation model) had 1700 TBW. Eight times more. Today's drive are becoming creap.
  • zdz - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    I meant mp510, sorry.
  • Makaveli - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    Yup the Corsair MP600 1TB which is based on the E16 controller is rated for 1800TBW.
  • Maverick009 - Friday, December 11, 2020 - link

    You are talking about 2 similarly but differently marketed drives, the Samsung 860 EVO is a step up or step down from QLC drives depending on how you look at it. The actual 200TBW or 600TBW is based slightly on warranty, data written to drive, along with a few other metrics, but in majority of cases an SSDs life will last several years to decades before it gives out. Well past the purchase date and in some cases past your lifetime.
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, December 12, 2020 - link

    Using Kristian's 850 Evo calculations as a guide, I got the following values, assuming a 1,000 p/e cycle for QLC on a 1 TB drive:

    20 GB/day (with 1.5x write amp) == 93.52 years
    50 GB/day (1.5x w.a.) == 37.4 y
    100 GB/day (3x w.a.) == 9.35 y

    Hopefully, I didn't muck it all up :)
  • Spunjji - Monday, December 14, 2020 - link

    Nice! Looks like it would be perfectly suitable for the lower-end users that QLC drives are aimed at.

    But hey, number go down, so all the NAND ranters have a sad.
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, December 15, 2020 - link

    I'm sure the Fact Rewriting Squad can work wonders with those values ;)
  • joesiv - Monday, December 14, 2020 - link

    Good idea using P/E cycles.

    Just remember, OS writes != NAND writes.

    There are other factors that will increase the WAF (Write Amplification Factor).

    It's totally not uncommon to have a WAF of 2x, but if there are bugs, or firmwares too focused on speed or particular usage scenarios, the WAF can be much much higher.

    Basically, it needs to be tested.

    SMART data may provide this for you, look at your Average Nand writes.
    If you're at 10, then you're 1/100th through your 1000 P/E cycles. You can calculate out how many GB/TB's you've used by using the life expecancy the manufactuers advertise (200TB?), divided by that ratio, to find actual NAND writes (if the SMART CTL isn't giving it to you)

    Good luck!
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, December 15, 2020 - link

    Had a crack at this earlier. Attributes were a bit obscure, but after some research, took value 241, LBAs written, and multiplied by 512 to work out bytes. From there, got about 2.28 TB or so, which squares with the ~2.4 TB value in Hwinfo. It's an 860 Evo 500 GB, just over a year old. I hardly play games or anything any more, so that's why the writes are so low. Also, round about May, put in a mechanical drive that was just collecting dust. It works well for storing films. Before that, space was a battle on the SSD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now