Apple Shooting for the Stars: x86 Incumbents Beware

The previous pages were written ahead of Apple officially announcing the new M1 chip. We already saw the A14 performing outstandingly and outperforming the best that Intel has to offer. The new M1 should perform notably above that.

We come back to a few of Apple’s slides during the presentations as to what to expect in terms of performance and efficiency. Particularly the performance/power curves are the most detail that Apple is sharing at this moment in time:

In this graphic, Apple showcases the new M1 chip featuring a CPU power consumption peak of around 18W. The competing PC laptop chip here is peaking at the 35-40W range so certainly these are not single-threaded performance figures, but rather whole-chip multi-threaded performance. We don’t know if this is comparing M1 to an AMD Renoir chip or an Intel ICL or TGL chip, but in both cases the same general verdict applies:

Apple’s usage of a significantly more advanced microarchitecture that offers significant IPC, enabling high performance at low core clocks, allows for significant power efficiency gains versus the incumbent x86 players. The graphic shows that at peak-to-peak, M1 offers around a 40% performance uplift compared to the existing competitive offering, all whilst doing it at 40% of the power consumption.

Apple’s comparison of random performance points is to be criticised, however the 10W measurement point where Apple claims 2.5x the performance does make some sense, as this is the nominal TDP of the chips used in the Intel-based MacBook Air. Again, it’s thanks to the power efficiency characteristics that Apple has been able to achieve in the mobile space that the M1 is promised to showcase such large gains – it certainly matches our A14 data.

Don't forget about the GPU

Today we mostly covered the CPU side of things as that’s where the unprecedented industry shift is happening. However, we shouldn’t forget about the GPU, as the new M1 represents Apple’s first-time introduction of their custom designs into the Mac space.

Apple’s performance and power efficiency claims here are really lacking context as we have no idea what their comparison point is. I won’t try to theorise here as there’s just too many variables at play, and we don’t know enough details.

What we do know is that in the mobile space, Apple is absolutely leading the pack in terms of performance and power efficiency. The last time we tested the A12Z the design was more than able to compete and beat integrated graphics designs. But since then we’ve seen more significant jumps from both AMD and Intel.

Performance Leadership?

Apple claims the M1 to be the fastest CPU in the world. Given our data on the A14, beating all of Intel’s designs, and just falling short of AMD’s newest Zen3 chips – a higher clocked Firestorm above 3GHz, the 50% larger L2 cache, and an unleashed TDP, we can certainly believe Apple and the M1 to be able to achieve that claim.

This moment has been brewing for years now, and the new Apple Silicon is both shocking, but also very much expected. In the coming weeks we’ll be trying to get our hands on the new hardware and verify Apple’s claims.

Intel has stagnated itself out of the market, and has lost a major customer today. AMD has shown lots of progress lately, however it’ll be incredibly hard to catch up to Apple’s power efficiency. If Apple’s performance trajectory continues at this pace, the x86 performance crown might never be regained.

From Mobile to Mac: What to Expect?
Comments Locked

644 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    Did you even skim through the SPEC benchmark sections here, or..?
  • SarahKerrigan - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    Look at Anandtech's benchmarks in this article. What "performance lost" are you seeing?
  • BlackHat - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    Those benchmarks are for performance per watt, are very efficiency yes, it doesn't mean very powerful, the MacBook Pro is supposed to be for heavy workloads but Appel compare this chips against a i7 SkyLake U, that don't give me a lot of good vibe, but we will have to wait for the bechmarks.
  • SarahKerrigan - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    No. They aren't. I'm not talking about Apple's numbers. I'm talking about Anandtech's numbers, on the fourth page of this very article, based on tests they ran themselves on the A14, which show the A14 generally exceeding Tiger Lake ST perf.
  • BlackHat - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    And that is why this article should have that in account, why Apple is claiming less performance than the bechmarks runs here? Maybe I missing something, I trying to understand.
  • ikjadoon - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    Exactly. Why on Earth should anyone care about Apple's marketing, Apple's benchmarks, or Apple's comparisons...when Andrei, Ryan & Anandtech have *tested* *independent* *benchmarks*?

    Firestorm is the fastest perf/W general computing uarch in the world & on the latest 5nm TSMC node, what ... else do people want?

    Companies sandbag performance *ALL* the time.
  • BlackHat - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    Companies sandbagging performance? Sorry but that last time that I checked all of them put heir products on the best light posible, Apple could have said: our new chips are as powerful or more powerful than the last generation MacBook (Ice Lake models) but they said of the world, ignoring Ice Lake, Tiger Lake or Renoir.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    What's your problem here? We benchmarked the A14 being faster than every other chip out there except the Zen3 parts. You do realise this is a 5 page article?
  • BlackHat - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    Sorry I'm not trying to be a troll or something, it just that you said that you don't know against what chip Apple compared this products so you said that you your supposition is that are against the lastest chips but Apple footnotes show that they are comparing against the 2 olds SkyLake version MacBook, which is odds when they have theses numbers that you show here.
  • mmrezaie - Tuesday, November 10, 2020 - link

    They have compared it to the latest and greatest. What else can we expect from them? I think they have done the best possible so far.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now