Aopen XC Cube AV (cont'd)

Construction


Click on images to enlarge.

The construction of the XC Cube is first rate, with no sharp corners and a feel of durability. The cover is made of aluminum with ventilation holes punched in it, and the frame is a combination of steel, aluminum, and plastic. For added convenience, thumb screws are used to secure the cover and the hard drive mounting bracket, but other than that small concession, the case continues to require a screwdriver. The hard drive cage slide out easily once the thumb screw is removed, and it is just as easy to put the cage back in place. The sliding action is a lot smoother than many of the other drive cages, where you feel like you have to force the cage into place.

The front panel is also well designed, and the fold-down flap that covers the front USB and other ports feels a lot more durable than on some other cases. It could still be damaged if you aren't careful, but it is made of a thicker plastic and does not feel like it will simply fall off if you bump it. There is a removable tray that houses the optical drive and flash card reader, and two screws hold it in place. Finally, we have the included CPU heat sink, a moderately-sized, all copper design with four heat pipes to help draw heat away from the CPU and up to the cooling fins. The fan on the HSF is mounted sideways and when installed, it will ventilate the warm air from the CPU through the holes in the side of the case. It's a well thought-out design.

One of the areas where nearly all of the cases have some issues is with the add-in card mount. In typical desktop cases, this area is located within the chassis and you unscrew the slot cover, insert your card, and then secure your card in place with the screw. It's not a perfect system, but it works well enough. The Aopen case has the actual mount on the outside of the case, but their design is easier to work with than most of the other cases. You remove one screw and lift up the retention mechanism, and then you can remove the empty brackets and add in your card. No screws are required to secure the cards in place, as a slight protrusion on the bottom of the retention mechanism helps to hold them in place. We're not entirely convinced of the long-term durability of this design, however, and would prefer a longer metal piece to hold the cards in place. Still, we didn't encounter any major problems during our testing.

Setup


Click on images to enlarge.

Assembling the unit was relatively straightforward. As with most SFFs, the included HSF is installed in the case and needs to be removed. There is a drive tray that you have to remove in order to secure the optical drive with screws, and it will also give you more room when installing the CPU. Once the CPU is installed, you replace the HSF and secure it in place with four clamps, one on each corner. While the drive tray is removed, we also installed the RAM, and when using an IDE hard drive, you should install the motherboard connection. Once all that is done, you replace the drive tray, install the HDD into its cage and slide that back in, and you're ready to boot up the system. If you're not taking pictures of the whole process, it can be done in under 10 minutes.

Once assembled, it's time to start installing the software. One key point to make here is that the InstantON software must be installed before you install Windows. In fact, it is best to have an empty hard drive (i.e. no partitions) before installing InstantON. Since we had previously used the same hard drive in another system, this caused the InstantON application to hang at the 100% complete mark and there was no information to explain what was wrong.

We would like for Aopen to include a drive partition interface in the InstantON software that would allow you to wipe all partitions, and even better would be if the software could allow you to dynamically resize an existing partition to make room for InstantON. The software appeared to do this initially, but we couldn't get InstantON to work. Whatever the case, the software needs to provide better reports to explain what is going on with the installation and hopefully allow the user to deal with any problems. If you're not going to use InstantON, of course given our earlier comments, then this is a moot point.

Once InstantON is installed, you install Windows. Simply leave the 100 to 300 MB partition in place. Then, move on to the driver installation. As is the case with most motherboards, many of the features will not be detected by the Windows setup and you will need to install the drivers afterwards. Here, Aopen has a very convenient tool called EZInstall on their driver CD. With it, you can select all of the drivers for the XC Cube and have them installed in one fell swoop. A single reboot later, and you're ready to install any other applications, update Windows, etc. For those who may not be sure where to get all the various drivers and what is and isn't required, this is very helpful.

Noise, Heat and Performance

To wrap things up, we'll say a little bit about the noise, heat and performance levels of the systems. Full benchmarks of these items will be provided later, but here, we provide our subjective impressions.

Starting with noise, which is likely the most important of these three areas to many, the XC Cube does not disappoint. We ran the system in two configurations: first was with the X800 Pro and second was using the integrated graphics. Our initial impression was that the unit was relatively quiet, but not substantially more so than its competitors. Later, when we moved on to running with only the IGP, we discovered just how silent a computer could be. (We also used a fanless MX440 card for TV-Out and found that the noise generated by the X800 Pro was enough to warrant retesting all of the other units both with and without the X800 Pro.)

Our SPL noise meter is only able to detect decibel values over 30 dBA reliably, and we're not testing in a sound-proof environment. With relative silence in the room, however, the meter was not able to detect the volume of the fans during most use. Periodically, the CPU or case fan would speed up to 35 dBA for a short time, but overall it was near silence. In fact, for the first time in a long time, the HDD seeking could be clearly heard and we found that the SATA Seagate drive is much louder when seeking than the IDE Seagate drive (it registered at about 45 dBA from 12 inches away).

As far as heat and performance go, the XC Cube was near the top in performance of the socket 478 systems. The one area where it fell short was in encoding performance, where it was about 10% slower than the other P4 systems; we're not sure why that one area was slower. Heat output was pretty typical for such a configuration. Pentium 4 systems definitely run warmer than Athlon 64 configurations, and you can clearly feel the heat being expelled from the case. However, we're not talking about a huge amount of heat here, and the thermal management of the motherboard appears to cope adequately with removing any heat. Even with the X800 Pro, we experienced no difficulties, and with the integrated graphics in use, we see very little cause to worry about temperatures.

Overall Impressions

The Aopen XC Cube is easy to recommend, given the included accessories and characteristics. Aopen also manufactures several other SFF cases that might be worth a look, if you like the design philosophy, and are looking for other alternatives. Most of their cases are available with either socket 478 or socket T/775, as well as in socket A formats. Unfortunately, there are currently no Athlon 64 variants in production, which is something that could further improve performance. If you're looking for something really different, Aopen also offers socket 479 variants for use with Celeron/Pentium M - we'll be looking at one of these in the near future. The MSRP of the Aopen XC Cube AV is one of the highest in our collection of SFFs, coming in at $450. Luckily, you can find this particular unit for under $350 at several locations, which is a lot easier to stomach. It's still more than most of the competitors, but when you consider the included TV tuner and software, it's actually quite a bargain.

Aopen XC Cube AV ASUS T2-P Deluxe
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • CrystalBay - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    Hi, How about the dual Opteron Iwill, that keeps flashing on the right.
  • skunklet - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    there is an ideq with an embedded c3 proc that i would love to see a review of.
  • gerf - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    I'd been looking at that Biostar SFF, as its specs are better than the equivalent Shuttle version, and is much cheaper. And now you drop a great review for it! I think that both I and my brother are going to use it for our new systems. Thank you for the kickarse review!
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    #6 - fixed, along with a few other things I noticed. If anyone sees anything else, feel free to drop me a line.

    #7/#8 - both of those are on the list of S939 systems we have coming for review. (We haven't received the PCIe one yet, but it should arrive sometime soon.) Unfortunately, most of the "high end" SFFs that we currently have are S775 for whatever reason. I think we have eight 775 units and only three 939 right now. I'd really like to see additional S754 units as well, since Sempron is moving in that direction.

    I think one of the reasons that we're seeing more Intel SFFs is due to the chipset support. 865G is really almost the same price as 865PE, so the integrated graphics are "free". They're not good for gaming, but for most other tasks they work well. The only AMD platform chipsets with IGP are currently the outdated VIA K8M800 and the SiS stuff, although there are some newer offerings.

    In case any of you aren't aware of this, we really can't afford to simply go out and purchase every item that we want to review. Since the reviews are basically "free" advertising (although if a unit has serious problems, it may not be good), the manufacturers have to send us the parts. In case any manufacturers are reading this, get in touch with us and we'll be happy to review any of your SFFs that you send our way! There are quite a few manufacturers that aren't currently represented.
  • Phantronius - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    Im hoping the SN25P turns out to be reliable unlike the SN95G.

    That and the way the PCI-E cards are facing the opposite direction makes me wonder about heat with both slots taken up. Hrmm....
  • REMF - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    AT - don't even consider doing your high-end round up until you have the new nForce4 P-series Shuttle due to be released at the end of the month.

    i would also like to see the nForce3 G5-Series Shuttle compared against it, and other high-end SFF chassis'. :D
  • AtaStrumf - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    WAU, that is one massive review! Good work guys.

    Just one typo to point out on page 8:

    The iDEQ doesn't include any notable extras **included**, but it does have all of the high quality standard features that we like.

    There was one more "it" that shoud have been "if", but I forgot where it was. Sorry :-)

    I thought this article would include a MAC mini, but I guess that will be a separate article altogether.

    If I may, I would suggest you only focus on SFF systems which stand out in a positive way and stay clear of the ones that don't. Just seems like a lot of pointless work.
  • MIDIman - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    Been waiting for anand's SFF reviews. Looking forward to the A64-939 / Intel 775 review that I'm sure will be next.

    arswihart - Note that the SB61G2V3 is Shuttle's latest socket 478, Intel-based system. All of their newer products are socket 775 which will be in a later review. However, I think there are plenty on the AMD side that could've been covered instead that are socket 754...the SN85G4V3 ain't too shabby.
  • quidpro - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    Absolutely no way that 7 bright blue leds in the Aopen (which only get brighter) should be considered acceptable or "minor" for an entertainment system, in my opinion. My shuttle has only two lights and I've had to cover them up with electrical tape with a small pinhole in order to cut down on the extremely distracting glare coming from it while watching a movie...the orange HD led flashes (as it should) which is even more distracting...
  • arswihart - Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - link

    what the hell were they thinking when they chose to review this obsolete Shuttle system?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now