Display Measurement

The display on the ROG Phone III is an OLED panel that features a 1080p resolution and a very high refresh-rate of up to 144Hz. Although it was something quite extraordinary back in 2019, in 2020 it’s doesn’t showcase the same kind of spec-list advantage versus the 1440p 120Hz panels by some other competitors in the market.

The phone gives you the options to operate at 60, 90, 120 or 144Hz which is quite wide array of selections. Unfortunately, much like other super-high refresh-rate panels on the market, going beyond 90Hz comes at a quite larger power consumption cost.

Colour settings on the ROG Phone III are very varied and customisable, giving you four different predefined display gamut selections. The “standard” profile is the calibrated sRGB target with a default colour temperature near 6500K, so that’s what we measured and what I would recommend users to choose when looking for accurate display colours.

We move on to the display calibration and fundamental display measurements of the ROG Phone III screen. As always, we thank X-Rite and SpecraCal, as our measurements are performed with an X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer, with the exception of black levels which are measured with an i1Display Pro colorimeter. Data is collected and examined using Portrait Display's CalMAN software.

Display Measurement - Maximum Brightness

In terms of brightness, the ROG Phone III fares well, with manual brightness reaching up to around 423cd/m², whilst when in adaptive brightness mode this boosts up to 652cd/m² full-screen white (100% APL) when under bright ambient light conditions.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

In the standard display profile, colour temperature is quite good at the high levels, tracking whites at 6453K. At the mid-levels there’s a bit too much greens.

Although greyscale colour accuracy is quite excellent with a dEITP of only 1.76, the overall error rate when including luminosity is quite bad in our results here, and the reason for that is that the phone is targeting a much higher gamma of around 2.4. Unfortunately this aspect is valid for all colour profiles of the phone and there’s no way to fine-tune or change this.

What this means is that mid- and low-levels will appear darker than they are meant to.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

Saturation accuracy against the sRGB target is excellent, with only minor deviations which are exaggerated by the higher gamma target of the display profile.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

The Gretag MacBeth chart of common colour tones and skin tones is also quite accurate in terms of colour saturations and hues, however the off-target luminosity because of the higher gamma is the main reason the total dEITP error rate is quite high at 8.57.

Overall, the screen of the ROG Phone III is excellent, although not class-leading. It’s not quite as high resolution or as bright as some competitors, but it still fares very well, and it’s currently amongst a very small number of phones which can claim a 144Hz refresh-rate, although the actual benefits of that over 120Hz devices is rather minor.

Colour accuracy is good, although you’d have to get used to that higher gamma target which produces darker colour tones.

GPU Performance & Power Battery Life - The Best
Comments Locked

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • s.yu - Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - link

    I have more faith in the sound quality of a C port powered active adapter than a wireless adapter powered by a tiny battery.
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    I love sdcards, but I'm willing to sacrifice for waterproofing. Also you can expend $ to get like 1tb storage. You can't pay more to get front speakers.. LAME.

    BS3 is cool, but also missing other stuff. And Xiaomi's crapware is bad
  • Lolimaster - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    Any flagship phone had "waterproof" +sd/sim slot. In fact, if a phone has a sim slot, there's no excuse for no sd support.
  • benedict - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    So the specs are almost the same as Xiaomi Mi 10, but the price is much higher. Asus is not a luxury brand when it comes to phones, so there's no excuse for the huge price premium.
  • hemedans - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    they always sell cheaper version with 8gb/128gb configuration, around $500.
  • GC2:CS - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    Does that mean S865+ is basically S865 with higher voltages allowed ?
    And a fan is needed to bring it back to regular temperatures.

    Why ask a premium for it then ?
    Also it is strange that the iP SE competes on GPU without people complaining that it burns their hands down.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    So far on the 3 S865+ phones that I have, they all have increased power for the increased peak perf, with worse sustained performance. So in that regard it does look disappointing.
  • Luminar - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    How is this disappointing? I thought you anticipated this situation of more peak performance and more peak power.

    You said this would be the case in your first article about the 865+. You said the 865+ would hit >3.0GHz but the 865+ would be able to consume the same or less power, due to being able to do more work in less time thanks to higher frequencies.
  • Luminar - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    Correction: *the same or less energy.
  • Lolimaster - Sunday, August 30, 2020 - link

    Increasing voltages, throwing aside efficiency. Phones can't simply comply with energy requirements using passive cooling, even if it's "liquid"

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now