Display Measurement

The display of the Mi 10 Pro is a Samsung Display AMOLED panel coming in at 2340 x 1080 with a 90Hz refresh rate. In terms of overall specifications, there’s nothing particularly new here as there are competitor devices which do outshine in in terms of features. However, Xiaomi still offers a decent and solid package that keeps things simple.

One aspect where Xiaomi seemingly tried to do better than the competition is the display calibration and customisation settings. Beyond only just offering different display profiles, amongst which we also find a supposed “Default” calibrated setting which we measured here, Xiaomi goes far beyond what I’ve seen other vendors do and also offer an extensive custom setting which allows you to pick various base colour gamuts and to fine-tune them to your pleasure by adjusting colours not only in the RGB space but also in HSV space, all with individual controls, and even having additional settings such as saturation levels as well as a gamma control slider. Having a gamma control slider is really rare to see in a smartphone and I don’t remember any vendor ever exposing such a setting as a use setting, which is quite interesting.

We move on to the display calibration and fundamental display measurements of the Mi 10 Pro screen. As always, we thank X-Rite and SpecraCal, as our measurements are performed with an X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer, with the exception of black levels which are measured with an i1Display Pro colorimeter. Data is collected and examined using Portrait Display's CalMAN software.

Display Measurement - Maximum Brightness

Starting off with brightness, the Mi 10 Pro doesn’t let you wanting as the screen can get very bright even in the most demanding conditions. Manual brightness levels at full screen white peaks at 488cd/m² which is amongst the brightest Android phones in this mode, and in auto-brightness mode under high ambient light, the phone boosts up to 772 cd/m² which is amongst the best of any device today on the market, on par with the latest iPhones and the OnePlus 8 series.

Portrait Displays CalMAN

As noted, Xiaomi offers a slew of different display modes that furthermore are customizable in their colour temperature mode. For our testing, we defaulted on the default accurate profile which says it has calibrated colours, and which is indeed, the most accurate default out of the box.

In the greyscale test results we see some problems however. Starting off with the colour temperature, things are just too cool whites and greys are lacking in blues. 100% white isn’t as bad but this is just an outlier amongst all the levels. At a colour error of dEITP of 2.24 it’s still a good result.

When looking at the luminance levels of the target patches, we however see worse off results as the Mi 10 Pro is suffering from too high gamma that tracks to a total of 2.39 which is far beyond the usual 2.2 target. This creates visibly too dark tones in all but the highest-level patches, and increases the dEITP to up to a quite bad result of 8.19.

When looking at the luminance levels of the target patches, we however see worse off results as the Mi 10 Pro is suffering from too high gamma that tracks to a total of 2.39 which is far beyond the usual 2.2 target. This creates visibly too dark tones in all but the highest-level patches, and increases the dEITP to up to a quite bad result of 8.19.

I noted that Xiaomi offers extensive customisation options for the colours. I’ve tried to play around with the settings and attempted to manually calibrate the screen as best as I could; while I managed to get a good colour temperature relatively easily, I didn’t manage to properly address the gamma curve errors even with the help of the gamma slider in the advanced settings. After much fiddling around, I deemed the panel calibration too unsatisfactory to be able to adjust with the given software controls adequately enough – just stick the default profile.

 

Portrait Displays CalMAN

In the sRGB space, saturations were ok but we do see larger errors in the mid red levels, as well as a fully saturated blue that’s off hue (I couldn’t fix this at all with the advanced controls).

Portrait Displays CalMAN

In the GMB test, colour accuracy is actually quite good with a luminance compensated dEITP of only 1.99, however the patches are again too dark due to the higher gamma target and that’s why we end up with an overall dEITP of 6.05.

Overall, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro screen is a very good display. It’s not the highest resolution, nor the highest refreshing display on the market, however it gets its basics done right, and is plenty of bright. The software shows that Xiaomi at least had the intent of providing a calibrated display experience, however the biggest issue here is that this purported accurate profile is too warm in its default colour temperature as well as showcasing a too high gamma. The phone gives you advanced colour controls which allows one to fine-tune the display to your taste, so it’s not too much of a negative.

 

GPU Performance Battery Life - Great
Comments Locked

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • zodiacfml - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    Isnt this similar in price to the ASUS ROG III?
  • Kishoreshack - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link


    Good that after the budget segment they are also making good phones in flagship segment
  • DZor - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    "4G + 5G NR NSA+SA Sub-6GHz" - NSA means directly connected/controlled by NSA?
  • GlossGhost - Monday, July 27, 2020 - link

    Yes the non-standalone direct connection to NSA. For your safety.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    Only in the delusional fantasy land that is Anandtech can a phone that sells for 999€ be considered a "solid value." That sort of headline is laughably disconnected from the economic realities of the world.
  • Flunk - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    I've found price delusion to be really common in online reviews. Phone prices spike up into the cieling and the reviewers say nothing. The Google/LG Nexus 5 released less than 7 years ago offered flagship features for $349. Nearly 3 times the price in only 7 years is not inflation. It's highway robbery.
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    " Nearly 3 times the price in only 7 years is not inflation. It's highway robbery."

    could be that $600/week bonus for being out of a job is giving them better choices. ya think I'm joking: "The chief also felt the island was seeing so many young people due to what he called “stimulus package money” — unemployed young people who were provided an additional $600 in their unemployment benefits during the lockdown."

    here: https://www.blockislandtimes.com/article/volunteer...

    Socialism works both ways: ya give extra moolah to the poor, they'll spend it; give it to rich folks and they sit on it or buy stocks and bonds. guess which keeps the real economy going? as it happens, that Island dries and blows away without the dayhoppers. gad.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    I see you've made a long reach so you could have an excuse to post a rant about something entirely unrelated.
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, July 23, 2020 - link

    I was replying to 'why do smartphone prices go up more than national inflation'? the answer is that consumers have the moolah to throw at discretionary buys. that's one of them.
  • surt - Wednesday, July 29, 2020 - link

    Genuinely wondering which side of the 'which keeps the real economy going' question you are on. Because the well demonstrated factual answer to that was to give the money to the poor, the economic outcomes from that are historically demonstrated to be much, much better.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now