*We are currently in the middle of revisiting our CPU gaming benchmarks, but the new suite was not ready in time for this review. We plan to add in some new games (Borderland 3, Gears Tactics) and also upgrade our gaming GPU to a RTX 2080 Ti.

Gaming: Final Fantasy XV

Upon arriving to PC earlier this, Final Fantasy XV: Windows Edition was given a graphical overhaul as it was ported over from console, fruits of their successful partnership with NVIDIA, with hardly any hint of the troubles during Final Fantasy XV's original production and development.

In preparation for the launch, Square Enix opted to release a standalone benchmark that they have since updated. Using the Final Fantasy XV standalone benchmark gives us a lengthy standardized sequence to record, although it should be noted that its heavy use of NVIDIA technology means that the Maximum setting has problems - it renders items off screen. To get around this, we use the standard preset which does not have these issues.

Square Enix has patched the benchmark with custom graphics settings and bugfixes to be much more accurate in profiling in-game performance and graphical options. For our testing, we run the standard benchmark with a FRAPs overlay, taking a 6 minute recording of the test.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

 

Gaming: World of Tanks enCore Gaming: Ashes Classic (DX12)
Comments Locked

249 Comments

View All Comments

  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    You just called them AMD shills. They went into this review to prove how great AMD is, that is not journalism, that is not a review, that is a marketing campaign.

    Literally zero need to use the CPU bench tool they have, literally every other site I've checked has a useful, much better review, although it doesn't hit the level of marketing you are looking for.
  • Spunjji - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    "Openly stating the obvious conclusion that your empirical testing led you to is a marketing caompaign" is exactly the sort of anti-intellectual, brain-dead take I have come to expect from you, Ben.

    He didn't call them AMD shills - you did, and all for daring to have an opinion.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 15, 2020 - link

    "They try to make a point with their review"

    That is to the letter the opposite of objectivity, that is precisely what shilling is, and I'm not the one that said it. Is English not your first language? You truly shouldn't being up intellect if you don't comprehend the words being used.
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    is it any different that the AMD Fluff like "Which is the best CPU" "Which is the best Workstation CPU" etc ...
  • Spunjji - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    How was that article "AMD fluff"?

    Oh, because Intel's offerings got panned. How sad. I guess that means Anandtech has a bias that tracks roughly with which parts are the best at any given time. Its almost like... objectivity 🤔
  • PeterCollier - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    I agree. Ian should take some classes from Andrei on chart creation and proper benchmarking.
  • Fataliity - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    The first page talks about,

    Which should you buy? the 3100/3300 versiohns, or a 2600, or a 1600AF?
    And then the benchmarks compare them.

    He's comparing what you can buy in the price range, I thought it was easy to understand.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    The world does not revolve around what amdownzjoo.com has as a recommended processor. Even if we were limiting ourselves to that, what about the 3200G? Every other site I found handled their reviews of this product much better.
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, May 13, 2020 - link

    What *about* the 3200G? It's an older, slower CPU. If you're going to add a dGPU, it's pointless. If you're not, you're still better off waiting for the 4000 series.

    The desperate scraping for even a semblance of a point in your posts is positively painful.
  • BenSkywalker - Friday, May 15, 2020 - link

    Wanting to see how a $99 CPU compares to a $99 and a $129 CPU is pointless..... You have a special way of viewing things.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now