Display Analysis

Acer offers just a single display option on the 14-inch AMD based Swift 3, which is a 1920x1080 IPS display. Considering the price, this is the right option, although it is interesting that they are offering a 13.5-inch 3:2 Intel based Swift 3 in the SF313-52. The 3:2 works quite well for productivity, although less-so for gaming where 16:9 generally suffers from fewer issues.

There is no touch capability with this display, which is a bit of a shame, but also understandable with the other features offered. Acer did well to hit their target price range, and they made overall good decisions on where to invest. Touch is a nice to have, but not a necessity, although when you are used to having it, it is amazing how often you try to touch the screen.

To see how the display stacks up, the laptop was tested with Portrait Display’s CalMAN software suite. For brightness and contrast, the X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter was used, and for color accuracy readings the X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer was employed.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The Acer Swift 3 does not get off to a great start. In a budget notebook, displays tend to be one of the first things on the chopping block. Luckily, we’ve moved past the era where these types of notebooks would offer 1366x768 TN panels, but Acer’s 1920x1080 IPS choice doesn’t offer very good black levels, and their backlight is somewhat weak. It is an inauspicious start.

Grayscale

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Grayscale measures the laptops ability to display white levels, from 0% (black) to 100% (white), and the Swift 3 performs quite poorly here. The blue levels are far too strong across most of the range. Gamma is also way off of the expected 2.2 level.

Gamut

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Windows 10 is still an sRGB system first and foremost, so proper sRGB gamut support is required for proper color accuracy. The Acer Swift 3 unfortunately does not cover anywhere near the sRGB gamut, which means that the LED backlighting was likely another area where some money was saved. Although grayscale can be salvaged with some ICC profiles, without full sRGB backlighting this laptop would likely suffer further if an ICC was applied because it simply cannot cover the entire sRGB spectrum.

Saturation

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The saturation test covers the primary and secondary colors, but unlike the gamut where they are just measured at 100% level, we test them on 4-bit steps from 0% to 100%. Since we’ve already determined the laptop can’t hit the full sRGB gamut, it is no surprise to see the saturation sweeps suffer.

Gretag Macbeth

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - GMB Accuracy

The Gretag Macbeth tests colors off of the primary and secondary axis, including the important skin tones, but with a display that can’t reproduce the entire sRGB range, the Acer Swift 3 naturally performs quite poorly on this test.

Colorchecker

Portrait Display CalMAN

Finally, we have the colorchecker, where you can more easily visualize the color errors with this display. This is a relative test, since any errors in your own display will influence the result, but on the bottom of the swatches is the color requested, and the top shows the color produced by the display. It is not pretty.

Display Conclusion

Overall, despite the poor showing here, the display is in-line with expectations at this price point. Over the last couple of years, there has been a push for better displays, and laptop makers have made the jump to 1920x1080 IPS panels pretty much across the board; so even though this display is poor compared to better IPS-based laptops, it still does offer the good viewing angles an IPS panel enjoys, and 1920x1080 works very well on a 14-inch screen size.

The very poor backlighting really does hamper the capabilities of this notebook. If you wanted to use it for editing photos or video, the internal components like the CPU, memory, and GPU, really would help, but the included display with its lack of sRGB coverage would certainly hinder the work. For basic office tasks, or even gaming, most people who are looking at a laptop at this price point will likely not be too concerned about the display, but just be aware that this one is deficient in several areas.

GPU Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • Potatonoot - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    This integrated graphics is very impressive, and the performance is just amazing for a 650 USD laptop.

    It isnt intended for gaming tho, we all know that. I am mostly impressed that it is an 8 core laptop.

    I am mostly happy things are getting cheaper and more powerful.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Throttling a CPU to 8 watts is amazing? Not being able to cover the ancient sRGB color space with even somewhat-decent accuracy is amazing?
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    So, this laptop apparently doesn't show the performance of the AMD processor at all, because it has garbage cooling.

    "The laptop really struggled with its thermals, dropping the framerate into single digits often. The device attempted to run at around 18 Watts of power draw, slightly over the 15 Watt TDP, but in fact only averaged around 8 Watts during this run."

    8 watts versus Intel's 25?

    "performance here will be strongly impacted by the TDP as well as cooling of the systems. Both AMD parts are 15W TDP designs, while the Intel chip sustains 25W."

    Does it sustain 25 watts or is that merely the TDP? Knowing Intel, I assume it goes beyond that.

    "The generational improvements here aren’t enough to catch up to Intel’s Sunny Cove cores in the Ice Lake i7-1065G7. Although that core might be running at higher single-core TDPs and power consumption, it still makes for a big gap in some of the more instruction pressure and cache pressure high workloads such as 500.perlbench_r and 502.gcc_r where the Intel chip still has a considerable lead in."

    Might?
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    It seems that your "15W" information in the article graphic is inaccurate.

    Shouldn't it be 8+ watts?
  • mazz7 - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    What do you expect from 600ish dollars guys, cmon get reality check, this product is clearly punching above it's own weight.
  • Nikhil Reddy - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    What's the exact price of this thing in India? When it will be available?
  • Oingles - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    They have packed in a lot for the price, I would buy this if it had a much better display option. 16GB would be good too. Happy to pay more for that.
  • defaultluser - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Does anyone know if this thing has a sodimm upgrade slot?

    8GB ram is so last-year for a $700 laptop (especially one where you have to share ram with the APU)!
  • Dug - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Did you guys ever consider you got a bad unit?

    I don't see any of the issues you had in other reviews.
    If you did, it would be prudent to announce that at the beginning of a re-review.
  • zodiacfml - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    Forgot to leave a comment. This laptop is almost perfect for me, 8 core and I don't need discrete. But, the cooling is abysmal. It reaches 100 degrees and stays at 90C?! I have a cheaper Lenovo but its cooling is overkill for an Intel-U TDP SoC.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now