Intel Server Processors

In the server and workstation segment - or "Enterprise Processors" if you prefer - Intel continues to develop both their Xeon line as well as the IA-64 based Itanium line. We'll start with the more common Xeon roadmap. We have further broken down the Xeon lineup into the uni-processor (UP), dual-processor (DP) and multi-processor (MP) segments.


Pentium 4 Xeon Lineup
Xeon Uni Processor
Processor Speed L2 Cache L3 Cache FSB Launch Date
Xeon UP 4.0F 4.00 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Cancelled
P4XE 3.73 3.73 GHz 2 MB 1066 MHz * Desktop Only
Xeon UP 3.8F 3.80 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q2'05
Xeon UP 3.8F 3.80 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Q4'04
Xeon UP 3.6F 3.60 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon UP 3.6F 3.60 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon UP 3.4F 3.40 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon UP 3.4F 3.40 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon UP 3.2F 3.20 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon Dual Processor
Processor Speed L2 Cache L3 Cache FSB Launch Date
Xeon DP 3.8F 3.80 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Cancelled
Xeon DP >= 3.6F >= 3.60 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q3'05
Xeon DP 3.8F 3.80 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Q4'04
Xeon DP 3.6F 3.60 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon DP 3.6F 3.60 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon DP 3.4F 3.40 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon DP 3.4F 3.40 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon DP 3.2F 3.20 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon DP 3.2F 3.20 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon DP 3.0F 3.00 GHz 2 MB 800 MHz Q1'05
Xeon DP 3.0F 3.00 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon DP 2.8F 2.80 GHz 1 MB 800 MHz Already Available
Xeon Multi Processor
Processor Speed L2 Cache L3 Cache FSB Launch Date
Xeon MP 3.66 3.66 GHz 1 MB 667 MHz Q1'05
Xeon MP >= 3.50 >= 3.50 GHz 1 MB 8 MB 667 MHz Q2'05
Xeon MP >= 3.50 >= 3.50 GHz 1 MB 4 MB 667 MHz Q2'05
Xeon MP 3.16 3.16 GHz 1 MB 4 MB 667 MHz Q2'05
Xeon MP 3.16 3.16 GHz 1 MB 667 MHz Q1'05
Xeon MP 3.0 3.00 GHz 512 KB 4 MB 400 MHz Already Available
Xeon MP 2.7 2.70 GHz 512 KB 2 MB 400 MHz Already Available
Xeon MP 2.2 2.20 GHz 512 KB 2 MB 400 MHz Already Available
Xeon MP 2.0 2.00 GHz 512 KB 1 MB 400 MHz Already Available

Changes in the Xeon lineup in many ways mirror what we saw on the desktop front, with Intel being even more conservative. Unlike the desktop parts, all of the Xeon chips based off the Prescott NetBurst core (i.e. Nocona, Cranford, and Potomac) have EM64T support enabled. There may still be some older pre-E-0 stepping 1MB cache cores around, but they are no longer in production.

On the UP parts, we again see the cancellation of the 4.0 GHz Nocona, while in the DP group we see the cancellation of the 3.8 GHz Irwindale. The reason for the removal of the P4XE 3.73 as a workstation part is not quite the same: the 925XE chipset does not support ECC RAM, which Intel requires for their workstation processors. The P4XE with 1066 FSB will thus be relegated to the enthusiast sector until Intel can come out with a newer chipset. A similar occurrence happened with the initial launch of the 925X chipset, as only later revisions have allowed for DDR2 to function with ECC memory.

There are once more several "greater than or equal to" entries in the roadmap, which in this case we assume to be there pending testing and validation of the parts in an enterprise environment. One thing that Intel has always prided itself on was rock solid stability in the server segment, and other than a few minor slips they tend to deliver. Intel would rather cancel parts or lower clock speeds than risk any instability in the server market. The desire for stability over performance is also reflected in the use of the slower 400 and 667 MHz FSB on the Xeon MP parts. The 4M and 8M L3 cache Potomac cores will be available in Q2'05, but final clock speeds remain an unknown at present, with a target of somewhere around 3.5 GHz.


Itanium 2 Lineup
Itanium Dual Processor
Processor Speed L3 Cache FSB Launch Date
Itanium 2 Dual Core TBD 667 FSB Q4'05
Itanium 2 Dual Core TBD 533 FSB Q4'05
Itanium 2 1.6 1.60 GHz 3 MB 533 FSB Q4'04
Itanium 2 1.6 1.60 GHz 3 MB 400 FSB Already Available
Itanium 2 1.3 LV 1.30 GHz 3 MB 400 FSB Nov '04
Itanium Multi Processor
Processor Speed L3 Cache FSB Launch Date
Itanium 2 Dual Core TBD 667 FSB Q4'05
Itanium 2 Dual Core TBD 533 FSB Q4'05
Itanium 2 TBD 9 MB 667 FSB Q3'05
Itanium 2 1.6 1.60 GHz 9 MB 400 FSB Nov '04
Itanium 2 1.6 1.60 GHz 6 MB 400 FSB Nov '04
Itanium 2 1.5 1.50 GHz 4 MB 400 FSB Nov '04

On the Itanium side of the roadmap, we again see the conservative nature of the market. 533 and 667 FSB designs have been pushed back, with the note that they are "dependent on OEM platform capability and validation." The chipsets and processors are available to Intel's partners for testing right now, but it does not look like any will be ready for public consumption just yet. The Madison 9M part that was originally supposed to launch in Q1'05 has been pushed to Q3'05 with clock speed likely to be in the 1.6 GHz range, based on information in past roadmaps. Q4'05 marks the availability of dual core Millington processors, with clock speeds again to be determined. They could very easily slip into 2006, although testing and validation of the parts will begin sometime in 2005.

Most of us may never actually see let alone use an IA-64 platform, but the technologies used in such high-end parts invariably trickle down into the mainstream processors. What sort of technologies are we talking about? One example is the redundant L3 cache design that is used in the Itanium. Due to the large die size of the chips, a flaw in the silicon matrix has a chance of drastically reducing the yields. Since the probability is high that flaws will occur in the large L3 cache rather than in the processor core itself, Intel has designed in some redundancy so that individual L3 banks can be deactivated and the work can be relocated to backup banks. With a die size that is more than four times as large as current Prescott chips, such precautions make sense. Another feature that will likely one day make it's way into desktop processors is the higher dispatch rate of the Itanium cores. Where NetBurst and K8 cores make do with a dispatch rate of up to 3 instructions per clock cycle, current Itanium 2 chips can dispatch up to 8 instructions per core per clock, and future revisions of the architecture could increase this further. It may take a while before we see these features in our home computers, but sooner or later they will come.

That wraps it up for this update of the Intel roadmap. Please remember that all of the dates and information in this roadmap is of a preliminary nature and could easily change. The cancellation of several parts in this update is clear evidence of that fact. Also, this is only a roadmap and not a comparison of processor performance, and not an endorsement per se of any of the parts. We are looking at what Intel is planning relative to what they already have available, and we'll worry about detailed comparisons with AMD when and if the parts actually launch.

Mobile Processors
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • danidentity - Friday, October 29, 2004 - link

    So the 6xx series is launching Q1 '05.

    Is that Jan, Feb, or March...or do we not know?
  • Pumpkinierre - Friday, October 29, 2004 - link

    What about Sckt 478 P4s? There was some hint on X-bit that a 3.6 or 3.8 would be released?!
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    You are correct, IntelUser, that the Itanium 9M is not shipping until November. In fact, all of the Itanium parts I listed as available are actually shipping in November with the exception of 1.6 GHz 3M DP chip. Stuff like that happens when you're trying to wade through large PDF files detailing the latest roadmap. Sorry - no one is perfect.

    As for the Dual Core versions being 24 MB of L3 cache, that is certainly one possible configuration. Since Itaniums currently ship with varying cache sizes (not to mention the redundancy build into the L3), "TDB" is always safer than specifying an exact value. When the roadmaps add a specific clock speed and cache size for Millington, we will update the charts. I would not be at all surprised to see more than one model of Millington come out late next year.
  • IntelUser2000 - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?...

    There seems to be both 479-pin and 478-pin parts for the Dothan and Banias. I doubt you can fit the chips at Socket 478 since the notches for the Pentium M chips are different from the Pentium 4 chips. It was said at Anandtech's Dothan review couple of weeks ago. I have a feeling some people just post here without any knowledge about what they are talking about.

    By the way, Madison 9M is not available, man just go to the Intel site. Madison 9M comes at November. It seems the reviewers are also flawed here, just like the readers.


    L3's for the Itanium Dual-core is definitely 24MB(except maybe for the low-end or low voltage parts). There is no article I have seen that says its not 24MB except Anandtech.
  • danidentity - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    The 5xxJ CPUs include EIST. Does that mean they'll have unlocked downward multipliers like Athlon 64's?
  • johnsonx - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    I noted that the title bar for the Dothan/Banias mobile parts chart shows '479M'. Is that a typo, or do the Dothan/Banias chips have an extra pin that prevents their use in a regular socket 478? I had thought that Dothan/Banias chips and Netburst chips were interchangeable with the proper mobile chipset and BIOS.
  • Foxbat121 - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    I was at Intel's web site a few days ago. The only 5xx processors that has data sheet or detail informations are step E-0 and M. Step D-0 for 550 or below are no longer listed.
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    Regarding the "5xxJ" series being unavailable in the US, my *guess* would be that it's a combination of several factors. First, many sites may simply neglect to note the added support for XD and EIST. It was enabled on later steppings (E-0 for the Xeons, although I'm not sure if the stepping is the same on the desktop side).

    The other possibility is that Intel (and/or their retail partners) are still trying to clear out the old inventory of non-J processors before they begin offering the newer model. That would also explain why they're showing up in OEM systems before retail: OEMs sell the majority of Pentium 4 systems, as most people that buy parts for their own PCs are going with AMD right now.

    That's all speculation on my part, but it would make sense. According to Intel, the XD/EIST P4 started shipping over a month ago. They *should* be available now, but they are difficult to find.
  • Foxbat121 - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    I'm also looking for 5xxJ series all over the web. It seems Intel releases these chips only to OEM , not retail, in US. But the retail 5xxJ processors seems readily available outside US for the same price as current 5xxE processors.
  • Illissius - Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - link

    Personally I hope they keep the x20-x30-x40 etc naming scheme, but only because I want to see a processor called the x86 (fat chance, I know, but one can hope) ;).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now