Gaming: Far Cry 5

The latest title in Ubisoft's Far Cry series lands us right into the unwelcoming arms of an armed militant cult in Montana, one of the many middles-of-nowhere in the United States. With a charismatic and enigmatic adversary, gorgeous landscapes of the northwestern American flavor, and lots of violence, it is classic Far Cry fare. Graphically intensive in an open-world environment, the game mixes in action and exploration.

Far Cry 5 does support Vega-centric features with Rapid Packed Math and Shader Intrinsics. Far Cry 5 also supports HDR (HDR10, scRGB, and FreeSync 2). We use the in-game benchmark for our data, and report the average/minimum frame rates.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V Gaming: F1 2018
Comments Locked

206 Comments

View All Comments

  • 529th - Thursday, November 14, 2019 - link

    There is also a Windows power plan called 'Ultimate' What's better for AMD Ryzen CPUs, RHP or the plain old Windows Ultimate power plan?
  • TallestJon96 - Thursday, November 14, 2019 - link

    Stop testing with a GTX 1080. It is almost 4 years old, and there are half a dozen cards that are significantly faster than it now. Anandtech's gaming benchmarks are behind the times and not very useful because of this.
  • Hadenas - Thursday, November 14, 2019 - link

    Please start using either a 2080 or 2080ti for gaming test. Nobody would use a 1080 with the 3950x.
  • Satyyri1972 - Wednesday, November 20, 2019 - link

    I am
  • CHADBOGA - Thursday, November 14, 2019 - link

    Always wonderful to see the worst gaming setup for benchmarking, anywhere on the internet.
  • SanX - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    where is source code for 3D particle movement? In the link above are only exe files and it is unclear what the test is doing. May be it is doing just one single operation in cache over and over again.
  • lenghui - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    I am guilty of not reading the entire article, and will definitely come back again to read it all. At a glance, I love how AnandTech includes the prices so that I don't have to keep looking it up. However, I am still unable to figure out what RHP vs HP means half way through the charts. I wish there is a simple legend to explain that. I tried looking around and didn't find any references. Again, I am guilty of not reading it all, just saying it would be super convenient when I want to look at the results in a crunch.
  • lenghui - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    Thanks for the review, Ian. I finally got to the last page and saw what HP and RHP means, but my earlier comment still stand.

    To me personally, I never ran Ryzen Master since the first two days I built my Ryzen machine because Ryzen Master can only launch when Virtualization Based Security (VBS) is disabled. This is really lame on AMD part. I built this 8 core-16 thread machine to run my VMs, but I can't run Ryzen Master :( Other than that, I love my build.
  • GreenReaper - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    This piece is a great endorsement of the 3900X, or the 3700X for desktop tasks. Why pay more?
    You profit from being willing to accept imperfect cores - and let's not forget a cooler is thrown in.

    Testing for the latest issues will be fun; not only do you have before/after microcode patches, you have before/after the program under testing was recompiled to avoid the situation requiring patching.
  • Sailor23M - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    3700X missing in the price/perf graph.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now