Board Features

The MSI MEG X570 Godlike is its flagship X570 model and as a result, costs a whopping $700. MSI includes a formidable accessories bundle with an Aquantia AQC107 10 G Super LAN add-on card, an M.2 Xpander-Z Gen4 dual M.2 slot adapter, as well as some classy looking red and black braided SATA cables. The highly premium controller set is heavily focused on networking and audio and includes two Realtek ALC1220 HD audio codecs, two rear-panel Ethernet ports controlled by a Killer E3000 2.5 G, and Killer E2600 Gigabit powered NIC. On top of that is a Killer AX1650 Wi-Fi 6 802.11ax wireless interface which adds BT 5.0 connectivity as well. Also on the rear panel is a 6.3 mm headphone output which is powered by an ESS 9018 DAC. 

MSI MEG X570 Godlike E-ATX Motherboard
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price $700
Size ATX
CPU Interface AM4
Chipset AMD X570
Memory Slots (DDR4) Four DDR4
Supporting 128 GB
Dual Channel
Up to DDR4-4800
Video Outputs N/A
Network Connectivity Aquantia AQC107 10 G (Add-on)
Killer E3000 2.5 G
Killer E2600 Gigabit
Killer AX1650 Wi-Fi 6 802.11ax 
Onboard Audio 2 x Realtek ALC1220
ESS 9018 DAC (6.3 mm jack)
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) 3 x PCIe 4.0 x16
(x16, x8/x0/x8, x8/x4/x4)
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 1 x PCIe 4.0 x4
Onboard SATA Six, RAID 0/1/10
Onboard M.2 2 x PCIe 4.0 x4/SATA
1 x PCIe 4.0 x4/x2
2 x PCIe 4.0 x4 (add-on)
USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) 3 x Type-A Rear Panel
1 x Type-C Rear Panel
1 x Type-C Header
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) 2 x Type-A Rear Panel
USB 2.0 2 x Header (four ports)
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
2 x 8pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x CPU (4-pin)
1 x Water Pump (4-pin)
7 x System (4-pin)
IO Panel 3 x USB 3.1 G2 Type-A
1 x USB 3.1 G2 Type-C
2 x USB 3.1 G1 Type-A
2 x Network RJ45 (Realtek)
5 x 3.5mm Audio Jacks (Realtek)
1 x S/PDIF Output (Realtek)
1 x 6.3mm Headphone Jack (ESS)
2 x Intel AX200 Antenna Ports
1 x Flash BIOS Button
1 x Clear CMOS Button
1 x PS/2 Combo Port

The rear panel includes a pre-installed rear IO shield and also features three USB 3.1 G2 Type-A, one USB 3.1 G2 Type-C and two USB 3.1 G1 Type-A ports, while there is also a front-panel header for a USB 3.1 G2 Type-C and two USB 2.0 headers offering up to four ports. The MSI MEG X570 Godlike is geared up for enthusiasts with nine 4-pin PWM enabled headers, with two 2-pin temperature sensors, a 14-phase power delivery for the CPU VCore, as well as 4-phases for the SoC. The storage options on offer include three PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots with two including support for SATA drive, with an MSI Xpander-Z Gen4 dual PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot add-on card, and six SATA ports.

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

While we have been able to measure audio performance from previous Z370 motherboards, the task has been made even harder with the roll-out of the Z390 chipset and none of the boards tested so far has played ball. It seems all USB support for Windows 7 is now extinct so until we can find a reliable way of measuring audio performance on Windows 10 or until a workaround can be found, audio testing will have to be done at a later date.

Test Setup
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700X, 65W, $329 
8 Cores, 16 Threads, 3.6 GHz (4.4 GHz Turbo)
Motherboard MSI MEG X570 Godlike (BIOS 7C34v12)
Cooling ID Cooling Auraflow 240mm AIO
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1200W Gold PSU
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 16-16-16-36 2T
Video Card ASUS GTX 980 STRIX (1178/1279 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Case Open Benchtable BC1.1 (Silver)
Operating System Windows 10 1903 inc. Spectre/Meltdown Patches

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Hardware Providers for CPU and Motherboard Reviews
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
DDR4
Silverstone
Coolers
Silverstone
Fans

New Test Suite: Spectre and Meltdown Hardened

Since the start of our Z390 reviews, we are using an updated OS, updated drivers, and updated software. This is in line with our CPU testing updates, which includes Spectre and Meltdown patches. We are also running the testbed with the new Windows 10 1903 update for AMD's Ryzen 3000 series CPUs, and X570 motherboard reviews. The Windows 1903 update improves multi-core and multi-thread performance on AMD's Ryzen processors with topology awareness meaning previous issues in regards to latency have been known to affect performance. As users are recommended to keep their Windows 10 operating system updates, our performance data is reflected with the 1903 update.

BIOS And Software System Performance
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • oynaz - Saturday, August 31, 2019 - link

    I actually prefer more cores to faster cores in my DAW. Each effect bus, or track, cannot be split into multiple cores, true, but you usually quite a few buses going.
  • inighthawki - Friday, August 30, 2019 - link

    Gaming
  • Sweetbabyjays - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    In a professional setting, where you are doing thread intensive workloads, and IT is not cool with you overclocking...then yes, I totally agree 3900x makes way more sense.

    "use less power overall" ? 9900k has a TDP of 95W, while the 3900x has a TDP of 105W, Additionally the Z390 chipset has a TDP of 6W while the X570 has a TDP of 11W. Now I know there is a discrepancy between how AMD and Intel measure TDP, so the numbers at face value may not be telling the whole story. That said, I would be very interested to see overall system power draw for both to test the veracity of your statement.
  • AshlayW - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    Oh boy, you actually think the 9900K uses 95W? Joke's on you pal, that's at 3.6 GHz. At full turbo clocks the 9900K uses 150-200W. Ryzen 3000 is almost twice the performance per watt in some scenarios.
  • Trikkiedikkie - Saturday, August 31, 2019 - link

    With the 3900 having many things inside the processor, whereas the 9900 has extra chips needed. And Intel's numbers only count for baseclock
  • Sweetbabyjays - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    "trounce it with it's higher core-count parts in multi-threaded scenarios." Aside from some synthetic benchmarks, I suggest looking at the puget systems website for professional benchmarks, if you're looking for more real world professional performance scenarios.

    The 12 core part is better in some(in some the 9900k is better) scenarios, but rarely(if ever) by more than 10%. Perhaps your definition of "trounce" is different from mine thought.

    If you're gaming much more often than you are working/creating the increased core count really wont improve your overall computing experience, if at all.
  • Oliseo - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    This is true. But the argument remains, just how many people actually use highly mutli-threaded scenarios.

    I'd wager if you got a venn diagram of gamers and content creators, the content creators would simply be a small spot on the very large gaming circle.

    I know a lot of gamers, yet I struggle to meet 3D cad designers or Film Editors.

    So yes, you're right, AMD will trounce Intel in that respect. But until we get games using more than 8 cores, the majority of people will not be better off because they simply don't need those extra cores as they don't run any software that can make use of them.

    And that goes for AMD folks wanting to get the AMD chips as well.
  • Trikkiedikkie - Saturday, August 31, 2019 - link

    Gaming is soo small compared to people doing actual work.
  • AshlayW - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    $150 more, for 10% higher single core performance when both CPUs already have extremely good single core performance, and you can place a 4700X in the same motherboard next year that will have even higher single core than the 9900K? Seriously people, consumer stupidity is why Intel is still selling CPUs.
  • Trikkiedikkie - Saturday, August 31, 2019 - link

    Single core is soooo last century.

    Only people that have very little serious work apart from Adobe want that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now