F1 2018 (DX11)

Succeeding F1 2016 is F1 2018, Codemaster's latest iteration in their official Formula One racing games. It features a slimmed down version of Codemasters' traditional built-in benchmarking tools and scripts, something that is surprisingly absent in DiRT 4.

Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained; otherwise, we should see any newer versions of Codemasters' EGO engine find its way into F1. Graphically demanding in its own right, F1 2018 keeps a useful racing-type graphics workload in our benchmarks.

We've updated some of the benchmark automation and data processing steps, so results may vary at the 1080p mark compared to previous data. Notably, for F1 2018 this includes calculating 99th percentiles from raw frame time output.

F1 2018 - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

F1 2018 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

F1 2018 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

F1 2018 is another example of the Radeon VII lining up at a more preferable position. 4K/1440p performance is essentially a tie among the reference RTX 2080, GTX 1080 Ti FE, and Radeon VII. Meanwhile, it is also comfortably faster than the RX Vega 64.

F1 2018 - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

F1 2018 - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

F1 2018 - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Middle-Earth: Shadow of War Total War: Warhammer II
Comments Locked

289 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Sunday, February 10, 2019 - link

    BenSkywalker, the short answer is this is based on a dated architecture (2 generations behind Turing) so there is no real way it's going to beat it in efficiency: It doesn't even try to compete with the 2080Ti.

    But the fact that a GCN\Vega-based card can nearly tie a 2080 is commendable. I think the problem this card has is it's $100 too expensive.
  • BenSkywalker - Monday, February 18, 2019 - link

    If we were comparing ray traced performance that would be a valid point, but we are talking about traditional rendering. They have a half node process advantage and are using more power than a 2080 by a comfortable amount.

    Try finding another chip, CPU or gpu that was built with a half node advantage, used more power *and* was slower.

    Either TSMC is having major problems with 7nm or AMD set a new standard for poor engineering in this segment.
  • Ganjir - Saturday, February 9, 2019 - link

    It is a shame the infinity fabric is disabled, because crossfire would actually give these cards a reason to use ALL of that bandwidth and capacity - at least on one card. Is there a way to enable this or is it a hardware limitation?
  • Alistair - Saturday, February 9, 2019 - link

    I calculate OxfordGuy has made 11 percent of all comments in this thread ;)
  • Zingam - Sunday, February 10, 2019 - link

    AMD should invest in power stations. And maybe even sell their future Radeon XIV in a bundle with a little power station!
  • Crion66 - Sunday, February 10, 2019 - link

    Nate or Ian, can AMD choose to enable pci-express 4.0 on this card when Ryzen/TR4 3000 is released?
    Also can crossfire be implemented by popular gamer demand?
  • ccfly - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    did anyone test this card in c4d ,radeon pro vs octane for speed ?
  • peevee - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    "Though AMD hasn’t made a big deal of it up to now, Vega 20 is actually their first PCI-Express 4.0-capable GPU, and this functionality is enabled on the Radeon Instinct cards. However for Radeon VII, this isn’t being enabled, and the card is being limited to PCIe 3.0 speeds"

    Oh God, how much I hate marketoids! Morons who cannot get an A even in the primitive school math are hired into marketing depts, and ruin EVERYTHING.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now