Benchmarking Testbed Setup

To preface, because of the SMU changes mentioned earlier, no third party utilities can read Radeon VII data, though patches are expected shortly. AIB partner tools such as MSI Afterburner should presumably launch with support. Otherwise, Radeon Wattman was the only monitoring tool possible, except we observed that the performance metric log recording and overlay sometimes caused issues with games.

On that note, a large factor in this review was the instability of press drivers. Known issues include being unable to downclock HBM2 on the Radeon VII, which AMD clarified was a bug introduced in Adrenalin 2019 19.2.1, or system crashes when the Wattman voltage curve is set to a single min/max point. There are also issues with DX11 game crashes, which we also ran into early on, that AMD is also looking at.

For these reasons, we won't have Radeon VII clockspeed or overclocking data for this review. To put simply, these types of issues are mildly concerning; while Vega 20 is new to gamers, it is not new to drivers, and if Radeon VII was indeed always in the plan, then game stability should have been a priority. Despite being a bit of a prosumer card, the Radeon VII is still the new flagship gaming card. There's no indication that these are more than simply teething issues, but it does seem to lend a little credence to the idea that Radeon VII was launched as soon as feasibly possible.

Test Setup
CPU Intel Core i7-7820X @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (F9g)
PSU Corsair AX860i
Storage OCZ Toshiba RD400 (1TB)
Memory G.Skill TridentZ
DDR4-3200 4 x 8GB (16-18-18-38)
Case NZXT Phantom 630 Windowed Edition
Monitor LG 27UD68P-B
Video Cards AMD Radeon VII
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (Air)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Video Drivers NVIDIA Release 417.71
AMD Radeon Software 18.50 Press
OS Windows 10 x64 Pro (1803)
Spectre and Meltdown Patched

Thanks to Corsair, we were able to get a replacement for our AX860i. While the plan was to utilize Corsair Link as an additional datapoint for power consumption, for the reasons mentioned above it was not feasible for this time. On that note, power consumption figures will differ for earlier GPU 2018 Bench data.

In the same vein, for Ashes, GTA V, F1 2018, and Shadow of War, we've updated some of the benchmark automation and data processing steps, so results may vary at the 1080p mark compared to previous GPU 2018 data.

Meet the AMD Radeon VII Battlefield 1
Comments Locked

289 Comments

View All Comments

  • HollyDOL - Sunday, February 10, 2019 - link

    Please, read what others write before you start accusing others.
  • eva02langley - Friday, February 8, 2019 - link

    Yeah, when your speaker sound is at 70-80 dB next to you when playing CoD... /sarcasm

    AMD is going to solve the fan problems. Temps are lower than the RTX 2080, they can play with the fan profile a little bit better.
  • SeaTurtleNinja - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Lisa Su is liar and AMD hates gamers. This is just a publicity stunt and a way to give a gift to their friends in the Tech Media. This was created for YouTube content creators and not for people who play games. Another Vega dumpster fire.
  • GreenReaper - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    But many YouTubers play games as their content. And people vicariously watch them, so effectively it's letting many people play at once, just for the cost of the video decode - which is far more efficient!
  • Korguz - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    yea.. amd hates gamers.. you DO know AMD makes the cpu and vid cards that are in the current playstation and xbox... right ???
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Yes, it's difficult to forgot the fiasco that is the Jaguar-based "console"

    (actually a poor-quality x86 PC with a superfluous anti-consumer walled software garden).
  • Korguz - Friday, February 8, 2019 - link

    how is it a fiasco ??

    the original xbox used a Pentium 3 and Geforce for its cpu and gpu... the 360, and IBM CPU and ATI GPU...
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, February 8, 2019 - link

    1) Because it has worse performance than even Piledriver.

    2) Because the two Jaguar-based pseudo-consoles splinter the PC gaming market unnecessarily.

    Overpriced and damaging to the PC gaming platform. But consumers have a long history of being fooled by price tags into paying too much for too little.
  • eddman - Friday, February 8, 2019 - link

    Consoles have nothing to do with PC. They've existed for decades and PC gaming is still alive and even thriving.

    Why do you even care what processor is in consoles?
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, February 8, 2019 - link

    False. The only difference between the MS and Sony "consoles" and the "PC gaming" platform is the existence of artificial software barriers.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now