Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation (DX12)

A veteran from both our 2016 and 2017 game lists, Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation remains the DirectX 12 trailblazer, with developer Oxide Games tailoring and designing the Nitrous Engine around such low-level APIs. The game makes the most of DX12's key features, from asynchronous compute to multi-threaded work submission and high batch counts. And with full Vulkan support, Ashes provides a good common ground between the forward-looking APIs of today. Its built-in benchmark tool is still one of the most versatile ways of measuring in-game workloads in terms of output data, automation, and analysis; by offering such a tool publicly and as part-and-parcel of the game, it's an example that other developers should take note of.

Settings and methodology remain identical from its usage in the 2016 GPU suite. To note, we are utilizing the original Ashes Extreme graphical preset, which compares to the current one with MSAA dialed down from x4 to x2, as well as adjusting Texture Rank (MipsToRemove in settings.ini).

We've updated some of the benchmark automation and data processing steps, so results may vary at the 1080p mark compared to previous data.

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 3840x2160 - Extreme Quality

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 2560x1440 - Extreme Quality

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 1920x1080 - Extreme Quality

For the Radeon VII, the intended goal was to equal or trade blows with the RTX 2080. The situation in Ashes: Escalation is still in line with that intention at 4K, where despite trailing the GTX 1080 Ti FE/RTX 2080 duo is comfortably ahead of the RTX 2070 and RX Vega 64. The lead begins to dwindle at lower resolutions, but the Radeon VII can still claim a 20% speedup at 1440p over the RX Vega 64.

Ashes: Escalation - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Extreme Quality

Ashes: Escalation - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Extreme Quality

Ashes: Escalation - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Extreme Quality

Far Cry 5 Wolfenstein II
Comments Locked

289 Comments

View All Comments

  • 29a - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    As usual in these garbage articles the prices given are nowhere near reality. The Vega 64 is $100 cheaper than what is listed.
  • RSAUser - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Anandtech doesn't ever seem to update reviews or prices.
    They'll compare a device from their history even if there have been months of driver updates that fixed performance issues, so they'll be using non-current info and everyone will assume it's current.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    "Anandtech doesn't ever seem to update reviews or prices."

    On the contrary, quite a bit was updated for this review. Though as driver performance has been rather stable as of late, performance hasn't exactly gone anywhere for most cards on most games.

    If you see anything that seems wrong, please let us know. But we go out of our way to try to avoid using any card/driver combinations that result in performance issues.
  • Korguz - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    29a
    if you think AT does nothing but garbage articles.. then, lets see YOU do better...

    as for prices.. meh.. thats something hard to account for as there are things called exchange rates, and other variables that no one can predict.....
  • Phil85 - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    So when will prices of GPU's decrease? Is this the new normal?
  • eva02langley - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Navi should bring value back to mid-range.

    It is still a nice card for professional/compute/rendering. But for gaming, the price is maybe 50$ too expensive, and AMD really needs to get some better quality fans.
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    If Navi is missing next generation features like ray tracing and tensor cores, there will be ZERO value to it.
  • eva02langley - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    AHAHAHAHA... Ray Tracing... you know the real problem of Ray Tracing? It was never on the table until Jensen brainwashed shill that it was important. by defending it, you obviously prove that you have no critical judgement.

    By the way, the problem with RT/DLSS is that it will never be implemented because AMD owns consoles, and that devs develop on consoles. There is no monetary benefit to implement gimmick proprietary gameworks features for 1% of the PC user base, unless if Nvidia is paying you to do so.

    It will never be a thing for the upcoming console generation. See you in 7 years, where it might be remotely relevant to the industry. As of now, unless you are rendering a CGI movie, it is worthless.
  • Dribble - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Both the next gen consoles are going to have ray tracing. Microsoft - who wrote and own the spec for the DX12 ray tracing extension currently used by PC's and hence a strong backer of ray tracing - will make one of them.
  • eva02langley - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    Not going to happen because RTX is proprietary, it is a closed environment, and require hardware acceleration that AMD is not going to pursue in the short time. Nvidia shoot themselves in the foot by pushing it. Open source is the only way a new standard can be adopted. The whole G-synch fiasco should have been enough to prove it.

    Hardware could run it still, but the impact on performances is just to important. At that point, developers like Sony have incredible talent in creating new effect that look way more realistic.

    Just looking at The Last of Us Part 2 is a good example.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now