The Specifications


 Feature  Canon Digital Rebel
(EOS-300D)
 Canon EOS-10D
Price ~$830 ~$1300
Pixel Count 6.3 Million 6.3 Million
Camera Type DSLR DSLR
Highest Resolution 3072x2048 3072x2048
Lower Resolutions 2048x1360, 1536x1024 2048x1360, 1536x1024
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size 22.7 mm x 15.1 mm 22.7 mm x 15.1 mm
Lens N/A N/A
Optical Zoom N/A N/A
Digital Zoom N/A N/A
Lens Thread EF, EF-S EF
Auto Focus Yes Yes
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Auto Focus Type TTL, 7 Point Focus TTL, 7 Point Focus
Aperture Range N/A N/A
Shutter Speeds 1/4000 - 30 sec, bulb 1/4000 - 30 sec, bulb
ISO 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 (3200 available with ISO expansion on)
Flash Built-in pop-up, hot-shoe Built-in pop-up, hot-shoe, sync
Exposure Compensation +/-2 stops in 1/3 stop increments +/-2 stops in 1/2 or 1/3 stop increments
White Balance Auto, daylight, shade, overcast, tungsten, flouorescent, flash, manual Auto, daylight, shade, cloudy, tungsten, fluorescent, flash, manual, Kelvin (color temperature)
Metering 35-Zone Evaluative, Partial, Centerweighted (camera picks automatically) 35-Zone Evaluative, Partial, Centerweighted (user picks mode)
Color Space sRGB, Adobe RGB sRGB, Adobe RGB
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Continuous Drive 2.5 fps, up to 4 shots 3 fps, up to 9 shots
Self Timer Yes Yes
Storage Method Compact Flash Card (Type I and II) Compact Flash Card (Type I and II)
Storage Included None None
Compressed Format JPG: (Large, Medium, Small) with quality options (Fine or Normal) JPG: (Large, Medium, Small) with quality options (Fine or Normal)
Uncompressed Format RAW + Medium, Fine JPG RAW + JPG options (Large, Medium, or Small) with quality options (Fine or Normal)
Quality Settings Normal, Fine, RAW Normal, Fine, RAW
Battery Type 1 BP-511/512 Lithium Ion 1 BP-511/512 Lithium Ion
Charger Included Yes Yes
PC Interface USB USB
TV-out Yes Yes
Tripod Mount Yes Yes
Weight (with battery) 23 oz 30.5 oz

 Digital Rebel  10D
Canon EOS Digital Rebel camera body Canon EOS 10D camera body
BP-511 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery BP-511 Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery
CB-5L battery charger with power cable CB-5L battery charger with power cable
USB cable USB cable
Video cable Video cable
Neck strap Neck strap
EOS Digital Solution CD-ROM EOS Digital Solution CD-ROM
Adobe Photoshop Elements CD-ROM Adobe Photoshop Elements CD-ROM
User's Guide and instruction booklets EOS 10D instruction manual
Pocket Guide Quick Operation Guide
Software Installation Guide Accessories Guide

Index The Design
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mday - Wednesday, July 7, 2004 - link

    how the hell are you going to compare these two cameras?

    This does not compare to what dpreview can offer.
  • GOSHARKS - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    i agree with shuttleboi, there are many sites out there that already provide excellent reviews from varying viewpoints (dpreview, imaging resource, megapixel.net, steves digicams, dcresource, etc). anandtech should focus on the things that the other large sites dont cover, what shuttleboi listed is a good start.
  • shuttleboi - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    Although your review is nice, I recommend you focus your attention more towards computer issues related to digicams rather than the cameras themselves (which other professional websites already do extremely well). Some other issues might be: (1) There is a 3rd party hack to the 300D firmware that reveals features found in the more expensive 10D. Is this safe? Does it really work? (2) How well do portable storage devices work (that let you dump a memory card to disk)? Relibability? Performance? There is absolutely nothing on the web right now that fully evaluates the products on the market. Here is an expansive list: http://fhoude34.free.fr/PortableHD.htm . (I'm waiting for the Nikon Coolwalker, but only because I don't trust companies whom I've never heard of.) (3) Software that manages/downloads photos. Photoshop Album? Breezebrowser? WTF?
  • opaper - Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - link

    And if you go to this digital camera review site you see that they found no diffrence in the resolution tests. I'm not saying that thier test is more valid than yours it's just a second opinion.

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos300d/page2...
  • jliechty - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    For covering the basic differences between the two cameras, this was a good review. However, to me this was pretty old news, since this particular topic has been covered a gazillion places already in a gazillion different ways.
    And of course, any camera can be a "professional" camera if you use it to make money, but in the traditional definiton, the 10D comes close to being a pro camera. The Rebel is not. If you want to see some real pro stuff, google the 1Ds. Or if you'd like some real sticker shock, check the price of the Phase One P25 (then add $8K USD more for the medium format autofocus camera system to go with it). ;-)
  • stephencaston - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    #2, sorry if I didn't make it clear in the article, but on page 3 I did mention that I was using a Canon 50mm Macro lens for all tests. I will add another reference to the lens at the beginning of the image quality tests too.

    You make a good point though. The quality of the final picture lies in the quality of the lens used. Thats why I decided to use the same 50mm lens for all the tests on both cameras.
  • DerekWilson - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    I'm not the resident camera expert (hi Stephen), but these cameras are "prosumer" and not professional ... kinda scary isn't it :-)

    I liked the article too. Maybe I'm a little biased, but I thought it was both very thurough as well as easy to follow (especially not being a camera guy myself).
  • shuttleboi - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    How can you possibly have tests trying to show detail and colour and not even mention the lenses you use?? As any good photographer knows, the lens is far more important than the camera body, even for digital. Did you use the kit 18-55 EF-S for the 300D? That's a horrible lens. Unless you used the same lens for both cameras, your tests are meaningless.
  • Araemo - Monday, July 5, 2004 - link

    Great Article, I was very pleased to see you guys are going to do digital camera reviews, since I'm going to be in the market for a camera soon. I hope to see reviews of more 'prosumer' or 'consumer' level cameras, rather than these $1000 cameras.. though I understand you probably get pretty much what you pay for.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now