The $60 CPU Question: AMD Athlon 200GE or Intel Pentium Gold G5400? A Review

95 Comments

View All Comments

• Irata - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  The price push happened after the release - but do check Anandtech graphics cards reviews - they do have a tendency of mentioning current street / retail prices for both AMD and nVidia cards, which is how it should be.
  
  This is from the RX580 review:
  
  "The biggest challenge right now is that GTX 1060 prices have come down to the same $229 spot just in time for the RX 500 series launch, so AMD doesn’t have a consistent price advantage"

• yannigr2 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  Assimilator is a known Intel Nvidia hardcore fan. Ignore him.

• The_Assimilator - Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - link

  Yes, pointing out facts makes me a fanboy. You a Trump voter by any chance?

• sonny73n - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  @The_Assimiator
  
  Are we not supposed to complain about the misleading pricing - one is Manufacturer’s SUGGESTED Retail Price and the ACTUAL price from the link provided by this article?
  If I want to build a cheap office system NOW, should I take this article into consideration despite the huge price differences?
  What’s special about the G5400 that its price has tripled due to “shortage”? At $182.68 currently from the link, is there no better CPU from Intel I can get for that price? Is Intel the only CPU manufacturer?
  What are you trying to achieve by calling us name? What our criticism to AT has to do with you?
  
  I’ve been restraining myself from criticizing AT too much. AT articles are slow to produce already. I wouldn’t want AT writers quit/fired then we’ll have less to read, even they’re written poorly.

• kkilobyte - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  What would have made the most sense is not writing such an article in the first place, then.
  
  I take Ian's own words on this: "I'm a big advocate of building a system piece by piece with the best you can afford at the time".
  
  And at the (current) time, it seems that one simply cannot afford the G5400 for $64 (except maybe out of pure luck). This should have been, taken into account into the conclusion, or at least underlined.

• AnnoyedGrunt - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  Neither of these CPUs makes much sense. The G5400 isn't readily available (sold out on Newegg or only available from re-sellers for $100, as is the G5500 or G5600).
  
  Once you are spending $100, it makes much more sense to get the Ryzen 2200G for the same price that typically outperforms both of these (or only loses by a little to the G5400 in office type of tasks). The 2200G actually looks pretty decent as an IGP solution, and is a much better platform once you go to a dedicated GPU as well.
  
  I'd personally work a few extra hours and save up for the 2200G over either of these options.
  
  -AG

• Valantar - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  Despite all the complaints here of comparing products at very different price points (retail, not MSRP), I would still like to see a more complete test suite run on the overclocked 200GE, especially the gaming tests.
  
  Also, is iGPU overclocking possible on this chip, or are iGPU frequencies locked? It would also be very interesting for you to part out example builds of this vs. the G5400 and the Ryzen 3 2200G, to see the difference in actual system cost.

• br83taylor - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  Are those power figures correct? If you compare Ryzen 3 2200g for 20W and Ryzen 3 1300X at 58W. A third of the power but same 4C4T configuration.

• Zoolook13 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  For what it's worth, in Sweden the prices match pretty well 695 SEK for a 220GE vs 759 SEK for a G5400.

• Zoolook13 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

  Sorry that ended up in the wrong place, edit button ftw...