Gaming: F1 2018

Aside from keeping up-to-date on the Formula One world, F1 2017 added HDR support, which F1 2018 has maintained; otherwise, we should see any newer versions of Codemasters' EGO engine find its way into F1. Graphically demanding in its own right, F1 2018 keeps a useful racing-type graphics workload in our benchmarks.

We use the in-game benchmark, set to run on the Montreal track in the wet, driving as Lewis Hamilton from last place on the grid. Data is taken over a one-lap race.

AnandTech CPU Gaming 2019 Game List
Game Genre Release Date API IGP Low Med High
F1 2018 Racing Aug
2018
DX11 720p
Low
1080p
Med
4K
High
4K
Ultra

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

F1 2018 IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

Even through the 4K, the G5400 is the processor to have for F1 2018 between the two.

Gaming: Shadow of the Tomb Raider (DX12) Power Consumption: TDP Doesn't Matter
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    To be sure, the normal price on the G5400 is ~$64. Past that, we have no specific control over whatever pricing shenanigans Amazon and its partners are up to at any given moment.
  • Irata - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Define "normal". Yes, the MSRP (manufacturer's suggested retail price) is $64, but you cannot - and have not been able to for a while - find the G5400 anywhere near this price (for stores that actually have them in stock).

    In terms of pricing - it's not just Amazon or Newegg - many posters here checked sites in various countries and it is more expensive everywhere.

    So imho, "normal" pricing would be the actual street price. And if you look at current prices, the Athlon GE's counterpart is actually a lower clocked 2C2T Celeron G4920 with half the G5400's L3 cache or alternatively, the G5400's counterpart would be the Ryzen 2200G / Ryzen 3

    As Ian stated that he bought this in Retail - where and when ?

    It would have good to either base the review on actually available parts / street prices or add a caveat stating that the G5400 is not available for the msrp.
  • yannigr2 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Bravo, you said everything.

    People will read this review, go to ANY shop, see the processor at double price and buy a Celeron. because the review told them that the Intel processor is faster in most tasks. This is how consumers behave, especially when they don't have technical knowledge. That's how an RTX 2080Ti sells a GTX 1050 when the RX 570 is faster in every way.

    This article is posted for a specific reason, and that's not a fair comparison.

    JMO
  • shabby - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    That's your excuse? We're not first graders here, when an article is based on the price you better make sure no shenanigans affect the price, try harder next time.
  • drzzz - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    What a crappy response Ryan. Given the entire mess about pricing that was made over the i7-7700K a few years ago by this very site. Arguing that street price is the valid metric vice MSRP at the time. Given the article was released without even one editor's note about the G5400 not being available anywhere for the MSRP was just a mistake. Own up to it and correct the article. When I can get a 2400G for the same price as the G5400 there is no comparison in performance or value. Looking at how much of the comments are about the price issues vice any other point from the article and face palm is all I can think about.
  • yannigr2 - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Really? Is Amazon dictation the G5400 price on the planet? I thought Intel was doing it. Because there is no chance to find this processor at that price on the planet. At least not as new.

    It WAS nice reading Anandtech this last 15 years.
  • SaturnusDK - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    No Ryan. The "normal" price is not $64. It's the 1k unit price. You'll probably never see this retail at less than $69... at best.
  • The_Assimilator - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    FFS, all you dipshits complaining "bu... bu... but... G5400 isn't $60" should actually look at the MSRP on Intel's site: https://ark.intel.com/products/129951/Intel-Pentiu...

    I agree that the chip isn't selling at anywhere near that due to shortages, but Ian has to take a baseline from somewhere and MSRP makes the most sense.
  • Irata - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    Point taken about the baseline but what's the point of the review if you cannot get the CPU for the MSRP ? The one that's closest price wise is actually a Celeron G 4920.

    The alternative would have been to either mention that current prices are a lot higher or post the article once the G5400 is again available for MSRP.
  • Haawser - Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - link

    When RX series GPUs were being pushed into stratospheric pricing by mining did reviews quote their 'normal' price, or the price people could actually buy them at ? So why are the rules suddenly different when the situation is reversed and it's the AMD product that's the cheaper option ?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now