AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here. As with the ATSB Heavy test, this test is run with the drive both freshly erased and empty, and after filling the drive with sequential writes.

The Patriot Hellfire, in blue, is highlighted as an example of a last-generation Phison E7 drive. Although we didn't test it at the time, the MP500 was based on the same controller and memory.

ATSB - Light (Data Rate)

The average data rates from the Corsair Force MP510 show a much larger performance hit for running the Light test on a full drive than we saw with the Heavy test, but in either case the MP510 maintains competitive performance.

ATSB - Light (Average Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)

The average and 99th percentile latencies from the MP510 are very low, though most of the NVMe drives listed here have sub-millisecond 99th percentile latencies and the differences generally imperceptible for workloads this light.

ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)

The MP510 continues to have some of the best write latencies and competitive read latencies, with the write latency in particular showing almost no penalty for running the test on a full drive.

ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)The 99th percentile write latency of the Corsair MP510 on the Light test is minimal, showing that the entire test operates within the very fast SLC write cache. The read latencies are very good, but don't set any records.

ATSB - Light (Power)

The energy usage by the MP510 during the Light test is a bit better than average but still about 30% higher than the Crucial MX500 mainstream SATA SSD.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • gunnys - Monday, October 22, 2018 - link

    I've been looking to upgrade the drive in my laptop for a while now, and will end up going with this over the 970 Evo. IMO, Samsung needs more serious competitors.

    It also helps that my experience with Corsair SSDs was back in the days of the Neutron GTX. It was a great drive back in the day.
  • fadsarmy - Thursday, September 15, 2022 - link

    My 240GB MP510 has 15TB out of 400TB written so that leaves 96.25% health remaining. Corsair toolbox and Crystal Disk Info both report 87% health remaining. This equates to about 110TB endurance, way off the 400TB claimed by Corsair. Is there any logical explanation for this?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now