Display Analysis

MSI offers both a 1920x1080 120 Hz TN panel in the GT75 Titan, as well as a 3840x2160 IPS panel, with the higher resolution display only offering 60 Hz refresh rate. Both displays support G-SYNC.

It’s a bit odd to see a laptop with a TN display in 2018, and we’ve not tested a TN for some time. The reason for the TN though is that it’s a lot easier to make a TN panel operate at a higher refresh rate than an IPS one, as we went over in our laptop display guide.

Also, not all TN displays are equal, and the viewing angles on the GT75 Titan are much better than you’d see in a budget TN device like the HP Stream, where if you even turn your head slightly you’d see a contrast shift. The GT75 Titan offers what MSI calls a “Wide View Angle” display, and although the display doesn’t match a quality IPS, it’s pretty good.

Although the 3840x2160 IPS panel would likely be considered an upgrade, there’s a lot of merit to sticking with the 1920x1080 display in the GT75. The added refresh rate is definitely a bonus, and despite this laptop offering the fastest GPU available, even the GTX 1080 is going to struggle with gaming when being asked to push more than 8 million pixels. 1920x1080 is a bit of a sweet spot, especially at the 120 Hz refresh rate, where quite a few of our gaming tests tended to be around anyway.

 To test the display we use SpectraCal’s CalMAN software suite, along with an X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter for brightness and contrast, and the X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer for color accuracy readings. MSI offers several display color options in their software, which we’ll cover in a bit, but all testing was done with the laptop set in sRGB mode.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The GT75 Titan doesn’t get exceptionally bright at just 278 nits, but it’s not a laptop you’re ever going to use outdoors, so that’s enough for indoor use. The contrast ratio is surprisingly good for a TN display at over 1200:1. Minimum brightness is 14 nits, for those that want to use this in a dim room.

Grayscale

SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Out of the box, the grayscale is quite good, with an average dE2000 of under 3.0. There’s a few points on the sweep where the error level creeps above 4.0 though, so it’s not perfect, but since most manufacturers don’t do individual calibrations of displays, it’s a pretty good result. The gamma though is very high, well over the 2.2 expected. This is going to cause dark scenes to be darker than expected, which may be an issue in games where they don’t offer a built-in way to change the gamma.

Gamut

SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - Gamut Accuracy

The gamut levels for the GT75 Titan actually exceed the sRGB gamut that the laptop is supposed to be targeting, which is not a good thing. It means that colors are going to be oversaturated by default, and if you calibrate, it will likely result in at least some levels of banding.

Saturation

SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The difference between the saturation test and the gamut test is that the gamut test only tests at the 100% levels for the primary and secondary colors, whereas the saturation sweep tests the entire range. It also makes it fairly obvious that the color not only exceed the 100% levels for sRGB, but they are also skewed off of the correct axis. The overall dE2000 level of about 4 isn’t terrible for a TN display, but it’s not close to some laptops in terms of accuracy.

Gretag Macbeth

SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - GMB Accuracy

The Gretag Macbeth test does a much wider sweep of the color spectrum, and tests colors off of the primary and secondary axis, such as skin tones. Unsurprisingly after seeing the other results, the overall error level on this display isn’t terrible, but every single color misses its target, with some of them missing by quite a bit. Several of the color tests are closing in on error levels of almost eight.

Comparator

The comparator gives you a look at the relative differences between what the display is supposed to be showing, which is the color on the bottom, and what the display is actually showing, which is the color on the top. It's a relative measurement though because any errors in your own display will change the results.

GT75 Auto Calibration

MSI has added a feature to their software suite which allows you to calibrate the display using a colorimeter. Currently it only works with the X-Rite i1Display Pro, the SpectraCal C3, or the SpectraCal C6. Although it does require some hardware, it’s nice to see this kind of an option available built right into the laptop software suite.

To see how it would do on calibrating this display, we gave it a run through using the X-Rite i1Display Pro.

SpectraCal CalMAN

Unfortunately, the built-in calibration actually made the display noticeably more red. It did fix the gamma correctly, but the red values are far higher than they should be across pretty much the entire sweep. The RGB levels were surprisingly good out of the box, and calibrating the laptop has made the situation a lot worse. If you are going to calibrate the display, you can likely use the software that comes with any of the colorimeters and get a better result.

Display Conclusion

Despite the GT75 Titan shipping with a TN display, it’s a lot better TN than most, offering pretty good viewing angles, without the massive contrast shift that’s the hallmark of TN. Although the color calibration isn’t perfect out of the box, and the display is oversaturated, this probably won’t bother much of the target demographics. It’s a bit of a shame considering the price of this device that some more effort couldn’t be put into the display at the factory, but that’s a story we are used to hearing about.

It’s also nice to see MSI include some rudimentary calibration software right in their TrueColor application. The calibration process itself only takes about 30 seconds though, and the end result is perhaps expectedly poor as a result.

However, when you look at gaming on this system, which is of course its primary function, the extra refresh rate, coupled with the G-SYNC, is very noticeable, and provides a very smooth result when coupled with the powerful GPU inside.

GPU Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    For a gaming laptop, it doesn't look overly obnoxious. Maybe OEMs are finally starting to back off from the excessive bling...one can hope anyway. Is it possible to install vanilla Intel drivers instead of Killer-branded ones and still end up with a working wireless adapter? The best solution would be for MSI to use an Intel WiFi NIC to begin with, but if the end user can still escape Killer software without opening the laptop up to replace the NIC, that'd be a second place alternative to fixing that particular hardware glitch.
  • GreenReaper - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    A laptop that destroys your lap, the competition, and your bank balance all at once!
  • ElvenLemming - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Is there a mistake in the spec table for GPU? There are two sections but the same 1080 information is in both.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Not sure, could be there was a 1070 model in the middle that was dropped for space reasons. Just looking on Amazon there're more models than the ones that could be crammed into the table here.
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    No mistake - they just have a lot of different models and there's not necessarily any sequential order for the components.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Brett, you're missing the point. If all the laptops in the table are 1080's then you only need a single full width cell for the GPU row, not two cells each with the same stats.
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Oh I see the issue. Someone deleted one row from my carefully crafted table. There's supposed to be one model with the GTX 1070. I'll fix it up.
  • RedNeon - Friday, September 14, 2018 - link

    Except that there already is a laptop with AMD Vega 56 GPU, the Acer Predator Helios 500.
  • shatteredx - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Love this laptop. I might prefer the ASUS though since it has an AHVA screen. Might wait for the 2080 at this point too.
  • timecop1818 - Thursday, September 13, 2018 - link

    Hey look another laptop with killer wireless. hard pass.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now