Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (Vulkan)

id Software is popularly known for a few games involving shooting stuff until it dies, just with different 'stuff' for each one: Nazis, demons, or other players while scorning the laws of physics. Wolfenstein II is the latest of the first, the sequel of a modern reboot series developed by MachineGames and built on id Tech 6. While the tone is significantly less pulpy nowadays, the game is still a frenetic FPS at heart, succeeding DOOM as a modern Vulkan flagship title and arriving as a pure Vullkan implementation rather than the originally OpenGL DOOM.

Featuring a Nazi-occupied America of 1961, Wolfenstein II is lushly designed yet not oppressively intensive on the hardware, something that goes well with its pace of action that emerge suddenly from a level design flush with alternate historical details.

The highest quality preset, "Mein leben!", was used. Wolfenstein II also features Vega-centric GPU Culling and Rapid Packed Math, as well as Radeon-centric Deferred Rendering; in accordance with the preset, neither GPU Culling nor Deferred Rendering was enabled.

Wolfenstein II 1920x1080 2560x1440 3840x2160
Average FPS
99th Percentile

I am actually impressed with Wolfenstein II and its Vulkan implementation more than the absurd 250+ framerates, if only because many other games hold back the GPU because of the occurring CPU bottleneck. In DOOM, there was a hard 200fps cap because of engine/implementation limitations, a bit of a corner case, but manufacturers make 240Hz monitors nowadays, too. On a GPU performance profiling side, of course, reducing the CPU bottleneck makes comparing powerful GPUs much easier at 1080p, and with a better signal-to-noise than at 4K.

This is combined with the fact that at 4K, the 20 series are looking a huge 60 to 68% lead over the 10 series, and we'll be cross-referencing these performance deltas with other sections of the game. Even in the case of a 'flat-track bully' scenario where the 2080 Ti is running up the score, the 2080 Ti's speed compared to the 2080 is somewhat less than expected at 24 to 27%. It's a somewhat intriguing result for an optimized Vulkan game, as the game runs and scales generally well across the board; It's also not unnoticed that both the RX Vega cards and GeForce Turing cards outperform their expected positions, though without the graphics workload details it's hard to speculate with substance. With framerates like these, the 4K HDR dream at 144 Hz is a real possibility, and it would be interesting to compare with Titan V and Titan Xp results.

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

337 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chawitsch - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    Besides artists, programmers working on such demos also deserve high praise of course.
  • Bateluer - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    Clearly, we're firmly in the age of 4K gaming for the upper range of cards. From Vega 64, 1080, 1080Ti, 2080, 2080Ti, all are throwing up very playable performance on 4K resolutions. I still expect to see people say you'll need SLI 2080TIs for 4K gaming, but that rings incredibly hollow when even a Vega 56 can deliver playable frame rates in most games at 4K with near maximum settings.
  • kallogan - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    Higher perf but higher power consumption, this is barely an improvement. Skip.
  • kallogan - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    There is absolutely no point whatsoever to buy these over a 1080 Ti indeed
  • Luke212 - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    why did you not show the other cards for SGEMM? epic fail. nothing to compare them to.
  • martixy - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    My takeaway:
    1080 owners and above should hold off, 1070 and below are probably justified in upgrading, with an eye to the future as the technologies baked in these cards mature and games utilizing them are released.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    I highly doubt that those that bought a $350 card are looking at a $1200 card as an upgrade.
  • Holliday75 - Friday, September 21, 2018 - link

    I am running a GTX970 and have zero interest in this generation of cards at that price. I am going to let the market settle, AMD release its next batch of cards or two and see where things are a year or two from now. Waste of money as far as I am concerned.
  • RSAUser - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    The 1080 Ti partner cards are substantially better than the FE ones, any chance of adding that to the benchmark?
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, September 20, 2018 - link

    Unfortunately not. We like to keep our comparisons apples-to-apples. In this case using reference cards or the thing closest to one.

    Plus we don't have any other 1080 Tis in right now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now