Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

The BarraCuda Pro 14TB drive helps Seagate retain their pole position in terms of offering the highest capacity drives for desktops and home consumers. Over the last three years, they have consistently been able to raise the bar, starting from 10TB, on to 12TB, and now, 14TB. Like the 12TB version from last year, the 14TB version also features eight PMR platters in a helium-filled sealed enclosure. The key to the increase in areal density lies in two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR). Prior to offering some concluding remarks, a brief look at TDMR could help some readers in appreciating Seagate's technological advancements that have resulted in the BarraCuda Pro 14TB drive.

Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording

Hard drives store data in platters with a magnetic medium. A platter has magnetic grains spread all over, and each bit is stored in a magnetic region with hundreds of magnetic grains. The 'heads' travel over the platters to write data by magnetizing certain regions, or, read the data from the region. Due to the circular nature of the platters that are mounted on a spindle, these magnetic regions are arranged in circular tracks. One of the key components of the areal density (i.e, number of bits that can be stored in a given platter area) is the 'tracks per inch' metric. Making the tracks narrow helps drive the areal density up. However, making them too narrow makes it difficult for the reading head. Since making the heads smaller is physically challenging, narrow tracks end up making the reader see more of the adjacent tracks and driving up the noise factor.


TDMR Operation (Source: The Magnetic Hard Disk Drive - Today's Technical Status and Future, Dr. Edward Grochowski and Dr. Peter Goglia, SNIA Data Storage Conference, 2016)

The TDMR solution puts two (or more) readers on the same track or partially on adjacent tracks. This provides a better idea of the interference effects and can help in cancelling out the noise. The first generation of TDMR only implements two heads partially on adjacent tracks to be able to read out the data in the narrow tracks with better confidence. It is envisaged that advancements in TDMR will eventually result in 3 or even more readers and the number of grains needed per user bit will also go down. In theory, TDMR can also be used to improve read throughput, but, the first generation implementations do not seem to be taking advantage of that possibility (at least in the consumer-focused drives such as the BarraCuda Pro 14TB we looked at today).

Final Words

Desktop hard drives are typically not rated for 24x7 operation, but, the BarraCuda Pro series bucks that trend. In addition to a 300TB/yr workload rating, Seagate also provides a 5-year warranty and, with product registration, 2 years of data recovery services. The lower load/unload cycles rating (300K, compared to the 600K in the IronWolf Pro NAS drives) and MTBF (1M hours, compared to 1.2M for the Pro NAS drive) are slightly disappointing aspects, but, they are made up for by the warranty and DRS.

In the desktop gaming market, per-game storage requirements are running into 100s of GBs, and SSDs continue to remain above $0.20/GB. Under these circumstances, high-capacity hard drives are continuing to remain relevant. In our evaluation, the BarraCuda Pro 14TB managed to perform quite well for largely sequential workloads (typical of bulk storage requirements in gaming workloads). Consumers dealing with content creation can also use the BarraCuda Pro as part of a direct-attached storage system. For single-user scenarios, a DAS inherently makes more sense than a NAS. It allows use of enclosures sporting interfaces with higher speeds. The BarraCuda Pro 14TB drive shows great performance in such devices.

Similar to the 10TB and 12TB versions that we had evaluated in the last couple of years, the 14TB version leaves very little to complain about. The launch price of $580 is $50 more than the 12TB version's MSRP when it was introduced last year. That said, in terms of launch MSRPs, the cost per GB metric is still in the 14TB's favor (4.14c/GB vs. 4.42c/GB). However, the 12TB version's current street price is just $440 (3.67c/GB). All said, it must be noted that the BarraCuda Pro 14TB is a pure capacity play. It doesn't deliver any marked performance improvements over either the 10TB or the 12TB versions released in the previous years. However, it does enable users to have more local / direct-attached storage per 3.5" drive bay than ever before at consumer price points.

Performance - Direct Attached Storage Mode
Comments Locked

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • boozed - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    *expressed
  • Xajel - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    Using helium helps with reducing turbulence near the platters allowing them to have these platters closer to each other, or slightly thinner platter, or both of these worlds to have more platters. But another thing about He filled drives is that platters faces lesser friction than regular air-filled drives, making the motor doing less work to maintain it's speed which eventually means lower power usage.

    But He filled drives are more expensive to make, not because of the Helium it self which only costs a little. But because Helium is too light and can escape very easily from any tiny hole and even macroscopic holes like how Helium filled balloons inflate with time because Helium is very good at escaping, They had to design the HDD to be completely sealed to force the Helium inside. And because Helium is used mainly to put in more platters in the drive so gaining more capacity per drive there's no point in adding it to smaller drives with these extra costs and complications. The only benefit then is to save more power.
  • GreenReaper - Tuesday, September 11, 2018 - link

    I think you mean *mi*croscopic holes. Macroscopic makes me think of Donut County:
    https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/08/donut-count...
  • Teknobug - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    14GB! I haven't even filled my 1GB drives yet.
  • Teknobug - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    14TB & 1TB*
    ^ brain fart
  • PeachNCream - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    Same here. I've got a 1TB 2.5 inch drive in an external case that I plug into my laptop for backing up the 500GB SSD. There's less than 250GB used. Not everyone has so little data though and its nice to see Seagate seeling capacity to those that want or need it. It looks a lot like some of the features are inherited directly from enterprise drives which makes me suspect a rebrand, but not a bad one given the additional features.
  • Samus - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    Pfft, the ExploitedCollegeGirls library alone is 1TB...
  • timecop1818 - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    Seagate? Nope. Drives over 4-5TB not in RAID? Nope. I'd like to actually keep my data.
  • Hixbot - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    What's preventing you from using RAID with this drive? I have 5 of the 10tb versions in raid 5.
  • wumpus - Monday, September 10, 2018 - link

    Mostly cost, although once you get into 40TB raid land I suspect the convenience of >10TB drives outweighs the issue of buying multiple 8 port SATA pci-e cards to go along with 16 3TB drives. The 3TB still wins in cost (although any more and I'd look into jumping to 4TB, the cost of the ports outweighs the cost of the parity drives) and you can also bump up to RAID 6. On second thought, I'm not sure how I'm going to wrap a case around 16 drives: that might be the biggest hurdle.

    Not that I'm convinced that RAID6 is necessary (as far as I can tell most "you need RAID6" assumed that bad bits were randomly dispersed and that a single bad bit would kill your data, actually bad bits have to be in 4k(byte) chunks (32,000 times as rare as they thought) and that at least consumers aren't going to store anything that can't afford a single [sector] of error (at least at 40TB level). But If I'm already buying 15 hard drives for RAID5, I'll bump it up to RAID6.

    Do you back that monster up on LTO? Picking up refurbished/semi-obsolete LTO for consumer gear appears complicated (but eventually justifies the cost): picking up "list price pro gear" makes more sense to have a backup RAID array.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now