A month ago we saw Qualcomm release a new “upper mid-range” SoC with the announcement of the Snapdragon 710 – the emphasis was on the fact that this was a new market tier aiming slightly below the top-tier flagship chipsets. Today, we’re seeing Qualcomm expand the traditional mid-tier and also what can be considered the low-end for smartphone devices. The Snapdragon 439 and 429 follow in the footsteps of the 435 and 425 and bring FinFET to the low-end; the Snapdragon 632 is more akin to the Snapdragon 652 as it’s now the first time we see big cores brought down to the lower mid-tier successor to the Snapdragon 630.

New 2018 Mid & Low-End Snadpragons
SoC Snapdragon 632 Snapdragon 439 Snapdragon 429
CPU 4x Kryo 250 (CA73)
@ 1.8GHz

4x Kryo 250 (CA53)
@ 1.8GHz
4x A53 @ 1.95GHz

4x A53 @ 1.45 GHz
4x A53 @ 1.95
GPU Adreno 506 Adreno 505 Adreno 504
Modem "X9 LTE" Cat. 7/13
300Mbps DL 150Mbps UL

4x10MHz C.A. 
(DL & 2CA UL)
"X6 LTE" Cat. 4/5
150Mbps DL 75Mbps UL

2x10MHz C.A. 
Camera/ISP Dual ISP
24MP / 13+13MP
Dual ISP
21MP / 8+8MP
Dual ISP
16MP / 8+8MP
Mfc. Process 14nm FinFET 12nm FinFET

Starting off with the Snapdragon 632, the new SoC is positioned as a successor to the Snapdragon 630. The 600 series suffered from quite a bit of naming confusion as we saw very large performance differences between the 65x and 66x series and the lower numbered ones such as the Snapdragon 630, 615 and 617 – this was largely due to the fact that the lower 600 series SoCs were missing the processing power of larger “big” CPU microarchitecture cores, while the 650 and up were effectively positioned as more expensive tiers.

The Snapdragon 632 now continues this lower-tiered positioning within the 600 series, but brings for the first time the performance benefit of big cores to this price segment. For these big cores we find 4x Kryo 250s running at up to 1.8GHz. Qualcomm didn’t confirm what CPU core this is based on, but looking at the CPUID of an unannounced device it matches the Cortex A72 and this would also make sense given the lower Kryo 2xx naming scheme. Qualcomm reached back confirming these are Cortex A73s. The big cores are paired with another 4x Kryo 250s – but again we’re effectively talking about Cortex A53 cores as the little cores in the efficiency cluster.

Meanwhile the Snapdragon 439 and 429 are direct successors to the 435 and 425. Like the S435, the S439 is a 8x A53 setup with a performance cluster going up to 1.95GHz while the second efficiency cluster goes up to 1.45GHz. The S429 is a simple single-cluster with 4x Cortex A53’s up to 1.95GHz and comes with a more updated Adreno 504 over the 425’s older Adreno 308, with the largest quoted performance improvement of up to 50%.

One of the most important characteristics of these new low-end SoCs is however that they’re manufactured on FinFET nodes – Qualcomm didn’t specify exactly the foundry or exact node but we’re likely talking about 14LPP or a 16FF variant, with the possibility of Qualcomm also third-sourcing these from UMC as well. Qualcomm reveals on its website the 632 is 14nm which likely points to Samsung 14LPP, and the 439 and 429 are listed as 12nm which points out to 12FFC from TSMC. This marks a generational shift as we see Qualcomm effectively have completed a total transition to FinFET products across its whole mobile SoC product line.

A large commercial advantage of the new chips is their design compatibility; the Snapdragon 632, 439, 429 are software compatible with each other and with the existing 626, 625 and 450 platforms. Furthermore the 632 is pin compatible with the 626, 625 and 450, and the 439 and 429 are pin compatible with each other. The software compatibility allows for a smaller resource investment on the part of OEMs and an accelerated time-to-market for devices. In particular, what seems to be very interesting here is the 632 being pin compatible with several older chips – It would be great to see OEMs be able to release quick refreshes of their devices with the new chip given that it’ll bring large performance improvements thanks to the new big CPU cores.

Overall the new mid- and low-end Snapdragons bring a generational improvement thanks to Qualcomm’s total switch to FinFET nodes across all of its line-up. The new SoC platforms are quoted be used in commercial devices released in the second half of 2018, which essentially means very soon.



View All Comments

  • ToTTenTranz - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    The S630 uses an Adreno 508 whereas the S632 uses an Adreno 506.
    Did they actually regress on the GPU performance or a higher-clocked Adreno 506 will simply perform as well as a 508?
  • eddman - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Andrei is probably wrong here. 632 looks more like a successor to 625/626 given it is pin compatible too.

    630 itself has more or less been unofficially replaced by 636 since most phone makers have used 636 in their latest mid-range models with some being even cheaper than the the 630 models.

    For example, nokia X6 uses the 636 and is cheaper than the 630 clad nokia 6.1 when comparing their chinese launch prices.
  • maketas - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    The 429 and 439 use a 12 nm node, as stated on the Qualcomm's site.


    The 632 uses a 14 nm one:

  • Marlin1975 - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    I wonder if that is an error? Qualcomm I don't think has anything else at the 12nm. But their product brief does show 12nm as you linked. Reply
  • SydneyBlue120d - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Is Galileo supported by these new chips? Reply
  • maketas - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Yes, all of them. Reply
  • SydneyBlue120d - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Very good! Thanks a lot. Reply
  • Strafeb - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Snapdragon 439 and 429 are in 12nm FinFET.

    Snapdragon 632 is in 14nm FinFET.
  • peevee - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Qualcomm goes the way of Intel. Too many SKUs instead of innovation. We see where it leads. Reply
  • jjj - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    Fake news much?
    You made the SD636 disappear and went on a glorifying rant.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now