Another year, another TechDay from Arm. Over the last several years Arm’s event has come as clockwork in the May timeframe and has every time unveiled the newest flagship CPU and GPU IPs. This year is no exception as the event is back on the American side of the Atlantic in Austin Texas where Arm has one of its major design centres.

Two years ago during the unveiling of the Cortex A73 I had talked a bit more about Arm’s CPU design teams and how they’re spread across locations and product lines. The main design centres for Cortex-A series of CPUs are found in Austin, Texas; Cambridge, the United Kingdom, and Sophia-Antipolis in the south of France near Nice. For the last two years the Cortex A73 and Cortex A75 were designs that mainly came out of the Sophia team while the Cortex A53 and more recently the A55 were designs coming out of Cambridge. This means that we haven’t seen any recent designs coming out of Austin and the last of the “Austin family” of CPUs were the A57 and A72.

The project being worked on in Austin had been hyped up for several years – I remember even as early as the A73 release back in 2016 the company had pulled forward some elements from an advanced future microarchitecture on the back-end pipelines, especially on the FP/SIMD side. The Cortex A75 was further remarked as pulling more elements from this new mysterious project.

Today we can finally unveil what the Austin team has been working on – and it’s a big one. The new Cortex A76 is a brand new microarchitecture which has been built from scratch and lays the foundation for at least two more generations for what I’ll call “the second generation of Austin family” of CPUs.

The Cortex A76 is important for Arm for a design perspective as it represents a new start from a clean sheet. It’s rare for IP claim to be able to do this as it represents a great resource and time investment and if it weren’t for the Sophia design team taking over the steering wheel for the last two generations of products it wouldn’t have been reasonable to execute. The execution of the CPU design teams should be emphasised in particular as Arm claims this is the 5th generation “annual beat” product where the company delivers a new microarchitecture every new year. Think of it as an analogue to Intel’s past Tick-Tock strategy, but rather Tock-Tock-Tock for Arm with steady CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 20-25% every generation coming from µarch improvements.

So what is the Cortex A76? In Arm’s words, it’s a “laptop-class” performance processor with mobile efficiency. The vision of the A76 as a laptop-class processor had been emphasised throughout the TechDay presentation so it seems Arm is really taking advantage of the large performance boost of the IP to cater to new market segments such as the emerging “Always connected PCs” which Qualcomm is spearheading with their SoC platforms.

The Cortex A76 microarchitecture has been designed with high performance while maintaining power efficiency in mind. Starting from a clean sheet allowed the designers to remove bottlenecks throughout the design and to break previous microarchitectural limitations. The focus here was again maximum performance while remaining within energy efficiency that is fit for smartphones.

In broad metrics, what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency. We’ll also see a 4x improvements in machine learning workloads thanks to new optimisations in the ASIMD pipelines and how dot products are handled. These figures are baselined on A75 configurations running at 2.8GHz on 10nm processes while the A76 is projected by Arm to come in at 3GHz on 7nm TSMC based products.

The new CPU is naturally still compatible with DynamIQ’s common cluster topology and Arm envisions designs to be paired with Cortex A55s as the little more power efficient CPUs. The configuration scalability of the DynamIQ IP again was reiterated and we were presented with example configurations such as 1+7 or 2+6 with either Cortex A75 or A76 CPU IP. This presentation slide was one of the rare ones where Arm referred to the area size of the A76, pointing out that the A75 still had better PPA and thus might still be a valid design choice for companies, depending on their needs. One comparison that was made during the event is that in terms of area, three A76’s with larger caches would fit inside the size of a Skylake core – all while within 10% of the IPC of the Intel CPU, but obviously there’s also process node scaling considerations to take into account.

A standout claim is that Arm aims to outperform the competition at half the area and half the power. Arm was slightly beating around the bush here in what it considers the competition, but generally the answer was that it was considering everybody the competition. Taking into account Intel, AMD or Samsung it’s actually not that hard to imagine Arm beating them in PPA as historically the company always had the smallest CPU designs and that directly translates into more efficient microarchitectures.

Before we get into more detailed breakdowns of the performance and power improvements and what I’m expecting to happen into products, let’s see the microarchitectural improvements on the core and how Arm managed to extract this much performance while maintaining power efficiency.

Cortex A76 µarch - Frontend
POST A COMMENT

122 Comments

View All Comments

  • vladx - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    That's weird, in most speed tests I've seen Android flagships beat iPhones in all but graphics-intensive apps like games and video editing. Reply
  • varase - Saturday, June 2, 2018 - link

    Those tests are usually serially launching a bunch of apps, then round-robining.

    It's probably more a demonstration that Android phones have more RAM.
    Reply
  • StrangerGuy - Sunday, June 3, 2018 - link

    Yup, that totally has to do with hardware and not thing to do with UI optimizations and design choices = Apple sux lolol

    But hey, somebody in this world needs to get their daily dose of retarded Youtube clickbait shit videos. Bonus originality points when it's Apple-hating.
    Reply
  • jospoortvliet - Wednesday, June 6, 2018 - link

    Yeah, app developers make sure to keep the Android versions lighter to not let performance completely fall apart on all the many cheap 8x a53 SOC's out there... fi d a real equivalent app that does heavy stuff like render a large pdf or generate video's out of a bunch of pics and videos. I mean, really the same. Not sure if faster CPU and storage will not make a huge diff then... Reply
  • B3an - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    Do Anandtech writers know the meaning of the word "several"? I keep seeing it said on here, when you actually mean a "couple" or a "few" because you mean 2 or 3. Reply
  • StormyParis - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    "several" means "more than one" so I'm not sure who's having a vocabulary issue. Or rather, I am. Reply
  • nico_mach - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    In American English, it's coloquially taken as meaning more than a few (sounds like seven and his progression is correct, couple<few<several). But it's not universally understood that way. Several is perfectly understandable imo.

    If you want to quibble, the phrase 'my projects' in the third to last paragraph should be 'my projections'.
    Reply
  • Gunbuster - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    Someone forget to update the PowerPoint deck full of "Laptop class performance" after the big nothing burger that is win 10 on ARM? Reply
  • nico_mach - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    That was such a disappointing set of products. Just the price of them for the performance and spec. Reply
  • lilmoe - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    Nope. Still don't agree that efficiency at max clocks is indicator of anything in a smartphone form factor. Total power draw per worked is where it's at.

    This announcement shouldn't be comparable with the current 9810. I don't believe the a76 would fair well on 10nm, and definitely not in a quad core - high cache configuration. Samsung rushed the design; neither the OS/firmware nor the process were ready for that chip, but it still was competitive, despite not being to my liking. It would have kicked butt running windows on arm though.

    The a76 and a12 at 7nm will be competing against the m4 at 7nm EUV. I don't want to get ahead of myself, but I have my money on Samsung. Here's to a GS10 released in one SoC configuration without holding any of its features or performance back.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now