System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Corsair HX 750 power supply. This power supply is Platinum rated. As I am in the US on a 120 V supply, leads to ~87% efficiency > 75W, and 92%+ efficiency at 375W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)

Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

In our power consumption tests, the Z370 Taichi used a few more watts on idle than most boards we have tested with long idle use at 46W and OS idle using 48W. Load power use was better compared to others, showing 144W. 

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 10 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.

Non UEFI POST Time

In our POST test results, the Taichi started to load windows in a shade under 17 seconds default and 15.4 seconds when we stripped functionality down disabling extra SATA, LAN, and USB controllers. This result was the fastest boot times so far by nearly 1 second.  

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds. 

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

The DPC latency results for the Z370 Taichi we also the best we have seen out of what has been tested so far with a time of 101µs. This result easily eclipsed the previous best for the platform of 265µs, but mainly due to an adjustment in our testing procedure as mentioned on the front page. As we test more boards (we might have to retest a couple as well), this value should me more consistent across the products. We're not putting much weight on this result in our conclusion at this time due to the change.

Board Features CPU Performance: Short Form
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • JoeyJoJo123 - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    I see native PS/2 port as a plus. Don't use it? Don't buy it. There's plenty of boards out there that don't have it.

    I have (although I don't regularly use) an IBM Model M keyboard. PS/2 is the standard interface it uses. I'd much prefer to plug it into a native port rather than trying to use a USB adapter and having to deal with key rollover issues due to how usb polling works. The PS/2 bus is inherently interrupt based. As soon as a key is pressed, it's registered, so naturally it's NKRO.

    My daily driver keyboard is just a Filco Majestouch 2, just because of the slimmer bezel and brown switches have a lower noise threshold. But I do enjoy plugging the Model M in from time to time, such as trying it out for rhythm games that use keyboard input, etc.
  • Myrandex - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    Thank goodness, I still use my PS/2 port all the time, better implementations for sure than many USB variants
  • Flunk - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    It costs a few cents to add, so I'd say it's better than not having anything there. 4 USB ports is enough for anything I'd want to do with this board. I'd rather not pay for the Wi-Fi, but apparently that's a thing people want built in to their desktop boards?
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, July 21, 2018 - link

    It supports the x86 architecture, too!
  • imaheadcase - Sunday, July 22, 2018 - link

    You do know that many commercial hardware devices still use PS/2 ports for latency purposes? Lots of specialized hardware requires it.
  • sonny73n - Sunday, July 22, 2018 - link

    @inighthawki

    Yours is the dumbest comment of the day or maybe you’re just trolling.

    My beloved mechanical keyboard has usb interface but I had it connected to the PS/2 port thru an adapter. Go figure!
  • empleat - Saturday, November 23, 2019 - link

    Haha actually PS/2 is better than usb, it has lower input lag, because it doesn't have to go around some stations and send data as they are available and doesn't wait until polling occurs. Also usb generates a lot of dpc latency, if you don't have it in msi-x mode, tho newer mobos, should support it. Didn't look, what has lower dpc latency, if ps/2, or usb tbh, because i can't use ps/2 unfortunately, mouse and keyboard i use doesn't support. But ps/2 should have still lower input lag... You actually should prefer ps/2, even some knowledgeable poster recently from linustechtips told me so.
  • PeachNCream - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    I don't get how you go from naming a product Taichi which is basically hinting at martial arts style to a motherboard festooned with cogs and gears. The name is significantly detached from the visual appearance to the point where the two are in conflict with one another and it all boils down to muddled branding nonsense.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, July 21, 2018 - link

    The metaphors are broken anyway, since they're computer motherboards. It's like Intel putting a skull on an SSD. Absurdity.
  • atragorn - Friday, July 20, 2018 - link

    On your home page you have "Zen in midrange" on the photo don't you think that is misleading ?
    When you say Zen most people probably think you mean AMD's new CPU lineup.
    At least I did at first.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now