AMD and Intel Have Different HPET Guidance

A standard modern machine, with a default BIOS and a fresh Windows operating system, will sit on the first situation in the table listed above: the BIOS has HPET enabled, however it is not explicitly forced in the operating system. If a user sets up their machine with no overclocking or monitoring software, which is the majority case, then this is the implementation you would expect for a desktop.

AMD

We reached out to AMD and Intel about their guidance on HPET, because in the past it has both been unclear as well as it has been changed. We also reached out to motherboard manufacturers for their input.

For those that remember the Ryzen 7 1000-series launch, about a year ago from now, one point that was lightly mentioned among the media was that in AMD’s press decks, it was recommended that for best performance, HPET should be disabled in the BIOS. Specifically it was stated that:

Make sure the system has Windows High Precision Event Timer (HPET) disabled. HPET can often be disabled in the BIOS. [T]his can improve performance by 5-8%.

The reasons at the time were unclear as to why, but it was a minor part in the big story of the Zen launch so it was not discussed in detail. However, by the Ryzen 5 1000-series launch, that suggestion was no longer part of the reviewer guide. By the time we hit the Ryzen-2000 series launched last week, the option to adjust HPET in the BIOS was not even in the motherboards we were testing. We cycled back to AMD about this, and they gave the following:

The short of it is that we resolved the issues that caused a performance difference between on/off. Now that there is no need to disable HPET, there is no need for a toggle [in the BIOS].

Interestingly enough, with our ASUS X470 motherboard, we did eventually find the setting for HPET – it was not in any of the drop down menus, but it could be found using their rather nice ‘search’ function. I probed ASUS about whether the option was enabled in the BIOS by default, given that these options were not immediately visible, and was told:

It's enabled and never disabled, since the OS will ignore it by default. But if you enable it, then the OS will use it – it’s always enabled, that way if its needed it is there, as there would be no point in pulling it otherwise.

So from an AMD/ASUS perspective, the BIOS is now going to always be enabled, and it needs to be forced in the OS to be used, however the previous guidance about disabling it in the BIOS has now gone, as AMD expects performance parity.

It is worth noting that AMD’s tool, Ryzen Master, requires a system restart when the user first loads it up. This is because Ryzen Master, the overclocking and monitoring tool, requires HPET to be forced in order to do what it needs to do. In fact, back at the Ryzen 7 launch in 2017, we were told:

AMD Ryzen Master’s accurate measurements present require HPET. Therefore it is important to disable HPET if you already installed and used Ryzen Master prior to game benchmarking.

Ultimately if any AMD user has Ryzen Master installed and has been run at any point, HPET is enabled, even if the software is not running or uninstalled. The only way to stop it being forced in the OS is with a command to chance the value in the BCD, as noted above.

For the Ryzen 2000-series launch last week, Ryzen Master still requires HPET to be enabled to run as intended. So with the new guidance that HPET should have minimal effect on benchmarks, the previous guidance no longer applies.

Ryzen Master is not the only piece of software that requires HPET to be forced in order to do what it needs to do. For any of our readers that have used overclocking software and tools before, or even monitoring tools such as fan speed adjusters – if those tools have requested a restart before being used properly, there is a good chance that in that reboot the command has been run to enable HPET. Unfortunately it is not easy to generate a list, as commands and methods may change from version to version, but it can apply to CPU and GPU overclocking.

Intel

The response we had from Intel was a little cryptic:

[The engineers recommend that] as far as benchmarking is concerned, it should not matter whether or not HPET is enabled or not. There may be some applications that may not function as advertised if HPET is disabled, so to be safe, keep it enabled, across all platforms. Whatever you decide, be consistent across platforms.

A cold reading of this reply would seem to suggest that Intel is recommended HPET to be forced and enabled, however my gut told me that Intel might have confused ‘on’ in the BIOS with ‘forced’ through the OS, and I have asked them to confirm.

Looking back at our coverage of Intel platforms overall, HPET has not been mentioned to any sizeable degree. I had two emails back in 2013 from a single motherboard manufacturer stating that disabling HPET in the BIOS can minimise DPC latency on their motherboard, however no comment was made about general performance. I cannot find anything explicitly from Intel though.

A Timely Re-Discovery Forcing HPET On, Plus Spectre and Meltdown Patches
Comments Locked

242 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alistair - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    Nothing I use in Windows including MSI Afterburner forces HPET on. I think your conclusion follows from that wrong assumption.
  • Dec666 - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    If it doesn’t use HPET, then how it can be precise? My conclusion doesn’t follow any assumption. AT’ve said that any software can force HPET. Maybe Afterburner doesn’t do that right now. But it is a great chance that it so right now with other software or will be with Afterburner in future.
  • eddman - Friday, April 27, 2018 - link

    ... becasue TSC in modern CPUs is invariant and accurate. HPET is not needed unless you're doing something out of the ordinary.
  • IKeelU - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    "However, it sadly appears that reality diverges from theory – sometimes extensively so."

    Please don't do this. There is no theory that states that HPET won't affect benchmarks, but rather an expectation that they will not. That is a different thing. I understand it's a common colloquialism to use "theory" in this way, but I also expect Anandtech to exceed common standards.
  • mapesdhs - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    The misuse of that word, and many others, is common in mainstream media. It probably starts in state education.
  • akamateau - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    How does HPET affect DX11 or DX12 bench results? I find it somehow odd that an obscure BIOS or O/S switch can be so controversial.

    I would suggest some research regarding HPET settings vis-a-vis DX12 or DX11 and even Vulkan. Since Windows 7 and 8 is still in widespread use how hardware responds to the two major API's is relevant.

    However there is also one system stress benchmark that while being in widespread use in European on-line media is almost completely ignored in the US with the occasional convenient exception of Toms hardware. That benchmark is the Chessbase Fritzmark.
  • Walkeer - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    Best job Anadtech! this why I read your articled and regard you highest on the net: what you are doing is science. Many, many thanks for that! Important question: will you be using new AGESA 1.0.0.2a BIOS for ryzen 2xxx? It shows positive performance impact: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&...
  • techguymaxc - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    Kudos for identifying and correcting the fault in your test methodology, and especially for publishing your findings. I was about to write AT off with those sketchy gaming results but I can see there is no need, you have redeemed yourselves! Anand would be proud ;)
  • ACE76 - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    Am I the only one that thinks Intel may have tried pulling a fast one here? Can the performance boost be validated on the Intel side?
  • mahoney87 - Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - link

    A fast one? Nobody turned on HPET during benchmarking for at least a decade. They've started doing it because AMD said so cause there were some discrepencies going on when posting results on HWbench

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now