Gaming Performance

Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity is a Real Time Strategy game developed by Oxide Games and Stardock Entertainment. The original AoTS was released back in March of 2016 while the standalone expansion pack, Escalation, was released in November of 2016 adding more structures, maps, and units. We use this specific benchmark as it relies on both a good GPU as well as on the CPU in order to get the most frames per second. This balance is able to better display any system differences in gaming as opposed to a more GPU heavy title where the CPU and system don't matter quite as much. We use the default "Crazy" in-game settings using the DX11 rendering path in both 1080p and 4K UHD resolutions. The benchmark is run four times and the results averaged then plugged into the graph. 

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 1080p

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 4K UHD

For the AOTSe results, in 1080p the GIGABYTE board ran with an average of 42.7 FPS which was at the bottom of a pretty tight group, a couple percent behind the Apex leading the pack. 4K UHD results placed the board right in the middle of the pack. Nothing is out of place here. 

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider is a third-person action-adventure game that features similar gameplay found in 2013's Tomb Raider. Players control Lara Croft through various environments, battling enemies, and completing puzzle platforming sections, while using improvised weapons and gadgets in order to progress through the story.

One of the unique aspects of this benchmark is that it’s actually the average of 3 sub-benchmarks that fly through different environments, which keeps the benchmark from being too weighted towards a GPU’s performance characteristics under any one scene.

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1080p

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 4K UHD

Rise of the Tomb Raider results for the have the GIGABYTE H370N coming in a bit slower than the rest of the results at 86.7. This is a few FPS behind the group. Moving up to the 4K UHD resolution where subsystems outside of the video card hold less weight, the system pulls right back up to the group within 1 FPS of the pack. 

CPU Performance: Short Form Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • TallBill - Sunday, June 24, 2018 - link

    What do you think about the term Nazi being thrown around as if it means nothing?
  • E1m1 - Monday, June 25, 2018 - link

    Does it support hdcp 2.2 on hdmi 2.0?

    And which itx bosrds supports hdcp2.2?.
  • CheapSushi - Monday, June 25, 2018 - link

    I really wish more boards put M.2 slots underneath the board! It's fanatastic IMO. Even ATX should do it. We have all these HEDT CPU available now with lots of PCIe lanes, even chipsets with even more lanes, and ATX and EATX don't even get full 7 x16 slots usually. I wish we could maximize the board even further. Full 7 x16 slots with M.2 slots on the back would just be so perfect for maybe 1 or two top end boards. Along with more SFF-8643 ports!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now