Overclocking

Overclocking Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from the previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (90ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Experience with the ASRock X299 Extreme4

Overclocking with the ASRock X299 Extreme 4 was pretty straightforward. About the only curious behavior we saw was with overclocking through presets within the BIOS. The curiosity is how the AVX offsets are set up with each tier. The BIOS gives four options, 4.2 GHz, 4.4 GHz, 4.6 GHz, and 4.8 GHz. The key here is the AVX offsets are different for each, but in the end when using this method, all AVX2 instructions will run at 4 GHz (a -2, -4, -6, -8 offset) while AVX3 runs at much slower speeds of 3.3 GHz (offsets of -9, -11, -13, and -15). Typically the offsets we see are somewhere around -3 by default. It only started to add voltage once I hit the 4.6 GHz value where it raised the voltage to 1.25V which led to extremely higher temperatures even at 4 GHz. Without some manual interaction to lower the Vcore, this was an unusable setting for all intents and purposes. Part of what did this was the VCCSA voltage increased to 1.4 V (which was a 'red' setting according to the BIOS). I was able to lower this down to 1.0V which handled the memory speeds we had without issue and brought temperatures and power use back to more sane level for the clockspeeds achieved. 

ASRocks' BIOS has a good number of options for for tweaking the system and for overclocking. The layout is logical and finding the right options is easy to do. However, it was sectioned up a bit more than I like. MSI and ASUS BIOSes, for example, can have all the overclock optiopns on one page and have the majority of settings a scroll away. The ASRock implementation requires a bit of jumping around multiple subsections for each thing be it CPU, Memory, or Voltage. 

The board did not run into any issues with either the DDR4-2666 or the DDR4-3200 sets of RAM we use for testing. Like the other X299 boards, it was 'set XMP and go'. We were able to overclock past the XMP settings of our 3200 sticks and reached DDR4-3600 speeds without issue as well. 

With the A-Tuning software there are options to set up custom fan curves, overclocking, and high-level system information such as temperatures and voltages. One thing I would like to see in the A-Tuning software would be VRM temperatures. Though it wasn't an issue at stock or while overclocked with the large dual heatsinks, with the general concerns of this platform, that would have been a good value add.  

That said, the VRMs and heatsink during overclocking were warm to the touch in our quick five-minute test. When we put it through longer testing (30 mins OCCT), the heatsinks were warmer, but not hot nor remotely alarming or worrisome. Overall, the ASRock X299 Extreme4 is a capable overclocker like many of the boards which preceded it.

Overclocking Results

The ASRock X299 Extreme 4 topped out at 4.6 GHz. We are again temperature limited here as well. The board had little to no vdrop and vdroop with LLC set to auto - like all boards we have tested. At the top end of 4.6 GHz and 1.15V, the system pulled 321W at the wall during our OCCT testing. Overall, the board is pretty capable of handling most any ambient overclock. If you choose to overclock using the automated features, there is a lot of room left to lower some of the secondary voltages that are raised so keep that in mind if temperatures are too high.

Gaming Performance Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ket_MANIAC - Thursday, April 26, 2018 - link

    Not to mention, not a single X399 motherboard review. Especially considering those CPU's are datacenter products and AnandTech specializes in reviewing products pertaining to that category.
  • MDD1963 - Friday, April 27, 2018 - link

    Threadripper/X399 is HEDT, not really 'Datacenter'....(not that it would do badly in a smal/medium business, for sure)
  • Galcobar - Monday, April 30, 2018 - link

    Considering this latest X299 review is labelled as HEDT, and almost every motherboard review lately has been for X299, a review of X399 as an HEDT platform should fit right in.

    Somehow, no.

    If it's so good for the industry to have AMD back on a competitive footing, it only makes sense to provide at least a few crumbs on the platform components. What's the point of reviewing the processors, and never the motherboards required to run the processors?
  • Ket_MANIAC - Tuesday, May 1, 2018 - link

    My thoughts exactly. Hopefully, by the time 2nd gen Threadripper launches, they will have reviews. Hopefully! I loved this website more when Anand ran it.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, April 26, 2018 - link

    In addition to how much RGB cancer a board has, could you start noting if it can all be disabled in BIOS/etc?
  • Total Meltdowner - Thursday, April 26, 2018 - link

    Hahaha, so true. The last thing I need is my room glowing at night if I leave my computer on to DL torrents.
  • StrangerGuy - Friday, April 27, 2018 - link

    LED indicators are so bright these days to the point of obnoxious in an unlit room.
  • CEH - Thursday, April 26, 2018 - link

    I run an Asrock Z270M Extreme 4 with macOS High Sierra and Windows 10, chosen mainly for its Thunderbolt 3 AIC. I've been very happy with its function and performance. As well as good value for money, they provide very good micro-ATX products. I'm very interested in their X299M Extreme 4. Will you be reviewing it soon?
  • MDD1963 - Friday, April 27, 2018 - link

    Intel would sell a lot more of these if they'd bring the price down to to $499 or so.... :)
  • MDD1963 - Friday, April 27, 2018 - link

    (7900X, I mean....)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now