Power Management

Real-world client storage workloads leave SSDs idle most of the time, so the active power measurements presented earlier in this review only account for a small part of what determines a drive's suitability for battery-powered use. Especially under light use, the power efficiency of a SSD is determined mostly be how well it can save power when idle.

SATA SSDs are tested with SATA link power management disabled to measure their active idle power draw, and with it enabled for the deeper idle power consumption score and the idle wake-up latency test. Our testbed, like any ordinary desktop system, cannot trigger the deepest DevSleep idle state.

Idle power management for NVMe SSDs is far more complicated than for SATA SSDs. NVMe SSDs can support several different idle power states, and through the Autonomous Power State Transition (APST) feature the operating system can set a drive's policy for when to drop down to a lower power state. There is typically a tradeoff in that lower-power states take longer to enter and wake up from, so the choice about what power states to use may differ for desktop and notebooks.

We report two idle power measurements. Active idle is representative of a typical desktop, where none of the advanced PCIe link or NVMe power saving features are enabled and the drive is immediately ready to process new commands. The idle power consumption metric is measured with PCIe Active State Power Management L1.2 state enabled and NVMe APST enabled.

Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)Idle Power Consumption

Updated February 1, 2018: The first time we ran the Intel SSD 760p through our idle power tests, it didn't go so well. The active idle power improvement brought by the SM2262 controller was clear, but when all the deeper idle power states were re-enabled the 760p actually started using more power. We haven't been able to fully determine what went wrong with that test run, but further investigation has revealed at least one apparent but minor bug in how the 760p handles the NVMe APST feature.

After turning off APST (and PCIe ASPM) to get the active idle power reading and a baseline for the idle wake-up latency, our test script re-enables APST and ASPM then give the drive a few minutes to settle down into its deepest sleep state before recording the idle power measurement. From what we have observed, this is not sufficient to actually get the 760p to its lowest power level. Enabling PCIe ASPM saves significant power, but the drive remains in power state 0 (active) even after APST is turned back on. The drive doesn't drop down to power states 3 or 4 (idle) until it receives at least one more command, after which it will start using the lower power states.

During ordinary real-world usage, APST will either be off (many desktops) or on (most laptops) full-time, and this particular bug would never be triggered even momentarily. To work around this bug, we've adjusted the idle power test scripts to poke the drive with one extra command after re-enabling APST, and that has resulted in the 760p setting a new record for PCIe SSD power savings. Since we haven't re-tested all of our M.2 PCIe SSDs with our new Quarch programmable power module yet, we aren't 100% certain that the 760p is the lowest-power NVMe drive out there, but it looks likely. The deepest idle state of the 760p also compares favorably against 2.5" SATA SSD in slumber state, the deepest achievable on desktop systems. SATA SSDs in laptops that can make use of the DEVSLEEP state may beat the 760p's deepest idle state, but we aren't set up to measure that.

Idle Wake-Up Latency

The excellent power savings in the deepest idle state provided by the Intel SSD 760p comes at the cost of a relatively sluggish 60ms wake-up latency. The 760p is still much quicker to wake up than the 600p was, and it is worth keeping in mind that not every transition out of idle will be this slow—the 760p has an intermediate idle state where it draws about 31mW and wakes up 1.8ms. During shorter idle periods, the 760p will be in this intermediate state that still offers an excellent balance of power and performance.

Mixed Read/Write Performance Conclusion
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • rrinker - Wednesday, January 24, 2018 - link

    It's not just the speed, it's the handling. A better analogy might be one of the supercars that can hit 300mph.
    See, in my 25mph residential neighborhood, I often have people running up behind me wanting to go 40 or more. Then I take a turn without touching the brakes, and suddenly they disappear from my mirror. But then my 1993 pickup truck can do the same, so I guess I don't need my BMW after all.
    Only - one of those old hard drives I still have in a drawer from 1993 just won't keep up with even the worst SSD I could buy.
  • Pastuch - Monday, January 29, 2018 - link

    The difference between a PC and a BMW is one of them will help you keep your virginity and the other will help you lose it. If the PC is a status symbol to you then I'd suggest you skip your next upgrade and buy yourself a new wardrobe. A 1080 Ti does not equal a hotter girlfriend.
  • megapleb - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    That's certainly the result i expect, but in a review, it feels like something that should be shown repeatedly. Without those results, I think the benchmarks can mislead people into poor buying decisions.
  • Makaveli - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    The Intel 750 still looks like the better drive to me just higher power usage.

    The $482 price from newegg is also outdated.

    I can pick up a brand new 750 drive in Canada for $218 CAD which is $175 USD which is cheaper than the $199 price you have listed for the 760p.

    The choice is obvious.
  • Billy Tallis - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    I try to only make buying recommendations that our readers could actually follow through on. There is not much stock of new Intel 750s left, and even less that could be had for the kind of prices you're quoting. I wouldn't trust anyone selling a "new" 750 for $175 unless it was clearly a liquidation sale from a retailer that was going bankrupt.
  • Makaveli - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    This "anyone" isn't some hipster selling a used drive on eBay. Its a major retail chain in Canada think like micro center in the US. And you are right they are clearing stock for the newer stuff to come in and certainly not going bankrupt they have 35 store locations.
  • Alistair - Wednesday, January 24, 2018 - link

    Still his point stands that you are referring to a clearance price. Might only be for a week.
  • Makaveli - Wednesday, January 24, 2018 - link

    The price has actually been like that for well over a month.

    I'm picking up the 1.2TB drive today for $488!
  • Magichands8 - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    M.2? But, why? And what's with the ridiculously high price/GB? It's 2018 and still for years and years nothing has changed in this industry. And we enter yet another year when SSD manufacturers have given me every reason to spend my money elsewhere.
  • tylerdd - Tuesday, January 23, 2018 - link

    Why isnt the intel 900p on any of the charts? It is the current storage king and its not on the charts as a comparison?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now