CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC for the supported frequency of the processor for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

The ROG Strix ended up on the lower side of the results completing our Blender benchmark in 210 seconds. The lack of MCT/E at stock means that some other boards (in exchange for more power) score up to 5% better.

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray often becomes sensitive to immediate frequency, with the MCE boards taking the lead. The Strix rather surprisingly misses the average result, scoring only 4426. In this set of testing, the CPU boosted to 3.6 GHz leaving it a couple hundred points/percent behind the middle of the pack boards which boosted higher or sustained clocks longer. 

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

WinRAR results put the ROG Strix right in the midle of the pack here at 34.6 seconds. 

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

7-Zip results have our ASUS board lagging a couple percent behind a close scoring set of results. In this test, the CPU boosted to 4GHz yet resulted in being behind all the other results. This result is almost as odd as that seen by our MSI top result, but was repeatable. 

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Similarly, the 3DPM result puts the ASUS at the back of the pack, below the TUF Mark 1 being very surprising. During this test it performs six mini tests with a 10-second gap between them: but our CPU showed 3.3 GHz during the test despite the lack of AVX-512 commands being used.

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

In the DigiCortex testing, the ROG Strix was right behind the TUF other ASUS board with a 1.14 result and is part of a tightly packed set of results. 

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Monday, December 11, 2017 - link

    Blame USB3, and not wanting to fill up space with mere 2.0 ports on a high end board.

    USB3, Sata, and chipset PCIe are all sharing the same limited set of 26 high speed IO ports on the chipset. The Nominal counts are: The back panel uses 8 lanes (6xUSB3.x, ethernet, wifi). 8 more are being used for sata. 8 for the pair of M.2 slots. PCIe slots take up 4+1+1 = 6. Front panel USBC is 3 (2 for the 2x 5gb USBA header, 1 for the 1x10gb USBC header. That's a nominal 33 lanes being used; lane sharing and onboard USB-C hubs make up the difference; but USBC hubs only add additional potential bottlenecking so adding more of them doesn't really do anything except bump up specsheet numbers.
    Ultimately what we need is to either move M.2 PCIe lanes from the chipset to the CPU (getting reasonable IO out of the southbridge was at lot easier before they started eating 8 or 12 of the available lanes); or a larger next generation southbridge. Ideally the latter would be combined with an 8 lane wide DMI on higher end platforms to reduce the bottlenecking that running everything through the equivalent of a PCIe x4 connection creates.

    https://images.anandtech.com/doci/11461/pch_alloca...
  • Morawka - Monday, December 11, 2017 - link

    The Rampage VI Extreme MSRP is $649.99, the price you have linked is from a 3rd party seller.
  • Joe Shields - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    Thank you. Normally we denote this, however it was missed upon publication. At the time the table was created, I do not believe newegg.com sold it themselves. Either way, the proper price is up!
  • svan1971 - Thursday, December 14, 2017 - link

    whats the chance we get a ROG MAXIMUS X CODE review?
  • davidden119@gmail.com - Monday, January 15, 2018 - link

    Pogo Techs Support contains the pogo game technical information which provides to the user to get resolve their pogo game technical issues. <a href="https://pogotechssupport.com/"> Pogo support </a>
  • chriswick - Monday, April 27, 2020 - link

    Reaching our 24*7 Pogo support can assist you to get the right assistance and get back to your own Pogo account. So, if your account has been hacked or blocked, then Pogo staff will be the best decision for you. Simply contact Pogo customer service phone number and get the help that you
    https://www.pogogamesnumber.online/
    https://contactpogo.jimdofree.com/
  • chriswick - Monday, April 27, 2020 - link

    Goodwillgate2iit is the best option for gate aerospace coaching. There you get extraordinarily experienced teachers who teach and assist you to offer the best direction with guidance during coaching and also gives study material which will help in self-study.
    https://www.goodwillgate2iit.com/
    https://www.goodwillgate2iit.com/gate-ae-xe-course...
    https://www.goodwillgate2iit.com/study-material.ht...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now