Grand Theft Auto V (DX11)

The other veteran from our 2016 GPU game suite, GTA V is still graphically demanding as they come. As an older DX11 title, it provides a glimpse into the graphically intensive games of yesteryear. Originally released for consoles in 2013, the PC port came with a slew of graphical enhancements and options. Just as importantly, GTA V includes a rather intensive and informative built-in benchmark, somewhat uncommon in open-world games.

Like its previous appearances, we follow those settings, as GTA V does not have presets. To recap, for "Very High" quality we have all of the primary graphics settings turned up to their highest setting, with the exception of grass, which is at its own very high setting. Meanwhile 4x MSAA is enabled for direct views and reflections. This setting also involves turning on some of the advanced rendering features - the game's long shadows, high resolution shadows, and high definition flight streaming - but not increasing the view distance any further.

Grand Theft Auto V - 3840x2160 - Very High QualityGrand Theft Auto V - 2560x1440 - Very High QualityGrand Theft Auto V - 1920x1080 - Very High QualityGrand Theft Auto V - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Very High QualityGrand Theft Auto V - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Very High QualityGrand Theft Auto V - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality

NVIDIA returns to dominance in GTAV, where AMD cards have typically struggled. Even at 4K, the GTX 1070 Ti tops Vega 64.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided F1 2016
Comments Locked

78 Comments

View All Comments

  • jrs77 - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link

    God those GPU-prices are extreme. All across the board they're some 30% too high imho.

    The last GPU I bought was a GTX660, which cost just a tad under $200. Now the 1060 costs $100 more than that.

    The GTX1070 should cost $350 and the GTX1080 $500. These are the price-brackets that existet just a couple years ago.
  • Yojimbo - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link

    You're exaggerating the price differences a little. You can get a 1060 6 GB for $260, and the 1080 does start at $500. And if you had a 2 GB 660 that's a bit like the 3 GB 1060, which can be had for $205.

    DDR3 prices per bit are close to where they were 3 years ago, and significantly higher than 5 years ago. I'm not sure how GDDR5 prices compare for then and now, but it's a safe bet that demand outstripping supply in the memory market has affected GDDR5 as well. Then consider that the GTX 1070 has twice the VRAM as the GTX 970.

    I think cryptocurrency was responsible for the high prices of graphics cards earlier this year, but as of now perhaps it's memory prices that are keeping them high. The closeness in price of the 1080 and 1070 and the big difference in price of the 1060 3 GB and 1060 6 GB probably still have to do with cryptocurrency. The 1080 and 1070 are based on the same GPU, and the pricing is affected by the yield and the demand for each card.Cryptominers demand the 1070,but not the 1080. If the 1070 is in demand relative to the the 1080 at a high ratio than the yield ratio of the GPU, it makes economic sense for the price of the 1070 to move upwards. Perhaps this situation is one reason the 1070 Ti only has one SM disabled. A similar situation exists for the 1060 3 GB/6 GB pair, pushing the 6 GB version up in relation to the 3 GB (cryptominers demand the 6 GB, I believe)
  • damianrobertjones - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link

    I NEED to see the minimum frame rate on each of the games. It's pretty much silly to show me 565+ fps when it dips to 42fps.
  • CiccioB - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link

    Tons of graphs are presented for each game and they all measure the timings on average and minimum. Have a look at the small pics below the big graphs.
  • letmepicyou - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link

    Not a big fan of how nVidia is creating facial recognition technology to help usher in the police state...
  • Yojimbo - Saturday, November 4, 2017 - link

    Which world is freer, one where we spend our time thinking of which technologies to ban and how to ban them, then implementing bans and spending our efforts enforcing the ban? Or one where we let technology progress and then work to integrate the technology in a beneficial way (which may require changes in laws after a period of disruption)? I'd argue that the second way is freer. How we use the technology is up to us. One could argue, I guess, that the Amish face no dangers regarding facial recognition policing (although maybe that's one technology they would like, because I think the reason they reject technologies is because they don't want individuals to have the power to be free from the Amish group structure).
  • r13j13r13 - Tuesday, November 7, 2017 - link

    5 fps
  • Gastec - Tuesday, February 20, 2018 - link

    The link for EVGA GTX 1070 Ti FTW2 opens up an Amazon page that in turn leads to the Buying Option FULLFILLED BY AMAZON of only $1,099.99. That way we get to save 0.01 cents. Isn't it Amaz ing?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now