The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition Review: GP104 Comes in Threes
by Nate Oh on November 2, 2017 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
- GeForce
- NVIDIA
- Pascal
- GTX 1070 Ti
The Test
To preface with relevant news, NVIDIA released driver version 388.13 WHQL earlier this week, bringing official support for the GTX 1070 Ti ahead of its release today. In addition, 388.13 brought game ready drivers for Call of Duty: WWII, Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus, and Need for Speed Payback. For resolved issues, NVIDIA has addressed second monitor blanking, yellow exclamation notices for graphics in Device Manager, and a corner case involving gamestreaming on hybrid notebooks. More details can be found in the 388.13 release notes. 388.13 is available for download on NVIDIA's driver download page.
For our review of the GTX 1070 Founders Edition, we are using NVIDIA's 388.09 driver supplied to us. The 2017 benchmark suite remains almost identical to the one described in the RX Vega review; inconsistent 1080p results for Dawn of War III were resolved and redone, while the Total War: Warhammer results from now onwards reflect the updated built-in benchmark, as Creative Assembly had changed the benchmark in late August.
As always, we try to use the best performing API for a particular graphics card.
| CPU: | Intel Core i7-7820X @ 4.3GHz |
| Motherboard: | Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (BIOS version F7) |
| Power Supply: | Corsair AX860i |
| Hard Disk: | OCZ Toshiba RD400 (1TB) |
| Memory: | G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 4 x 8GB (16-18-18-38) |
| Case: | NZXT Phantom 630 Windowed Edition |
| Monitor: | LG 27UD68P-B |
| Video Cards: | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (Air Cooled) AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 AMD Radeon RX 580 AMD Radeon R9 Fury X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition |
| Video Drivers: | NVIDIA Release 388.09 (Press) AMD Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition 17.10.3 |
| OS: | Windows 10 Pro (Creators Update) |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
78 Comments
View All Comments
BrokenCrayons - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
This review was a really good read. I also like that the game screenshots were dropped from it since they didn't exactly add much, but do eat a little of my data plan when I'm reading from a mobile device.As for the 1070 Ti, agreed its priced a bit too high. However, I think most of the current-gen GPUs are pushing the price envelope right now. Except maybe the 1030 of course which has a reasonable MSRP and doesn't require a dual slot cooler. That's really the only graphics card outside of an iGPU I'd seriously consider if I were in the market at the moment, but then again I'm not playing a lot of games on a PC because I have a console and a phone for that sort of thing.
Communism - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
Literally the same price as a 1070 non-Ti was a week ago.Those cards sold so well that retailers are still gouging them to this day.
Communism - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
And I should mention that the only reason that retail prices of 1070, Vega 56, and Vega 64 went down is due to the launch of 1070 Ti.timecop1818 - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
Still got that fuckin' DVI shit in 2017.DanNeely - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
Lack of a good way to run dual link DVI displays via HDMI/DP is probably keeping it around longer than originally intended. This includes both relatively old 2560x1600 displays that predate DP or HDMI 1.4 and thus could only do DL-DVI, and cheap 'Korean' 2560x1440 monitors from 2 or 3 years ago. The basic HDMI/DP-DVI adapters are single link and max out at 1920x1200. A few claim 2560x1600 by overclocking the data rate by 100% to stuff it down a single link worth of wires; this is mostly useless though since other than HDMI1.4 capable displays (which don't need this) virtually no DVI monitors can actually take a signal that fast. Active DP-DLDVI adapters can theoretically do it for $70-100, but they all came out buggy to one degree or another and sales were apparently too low to justify a new generation of hardware that fixed the issues.Nate Oh - Saturday, November 4, 2017 - link
This is actually precisely why I don't mind DVI too much, because I have and still use a 1-DVI-input-only Korean 1440p A- monitor from 3 years ago, overclocked to 96Hz. DVI probably needs to go away at some point soon, but maybe not too soon :)ddferrari - Friday, November 3, 2017 - link
So, that DVI port really ruins everything for ya? What are you, 14??There are tons of overclockable 1440p Korean monitors out there that only have one input- DVI. Adding a DVI port doesn't increase cost, slow down performance, or increase heat levels- so what's your imaginary problem again?
Notmyusualid - Sunday, November 5, 2017 - link
@ ddferrariWhat are you - ddriver incarnate?
I'm older than 14, and I wish the DVI port wasn't' there, as it is work to strip them off when I make my GPUs into single-slot water-cooled versions. Removing / modifying the bracket is one thing, but pulling out those DVI ports is another.
Silma - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
How can you compare the Vega 56 to the GTX 1070 when it's 7 dB noisier and consumes up to 78 watts more ?sach1137 - Thursday, November 2, 2017 - link
Because the MSRP's of both the cards are same. Vega 56 beats 1070 in almost all games.yes it consumes more power and noiser too. But for some people it doesnt matter it gives 10-15% more performance than 1070. When Overclocked you can extract more from Vega 56 too.