Mixed Random Performance

Our test of mixed random reads and writes covers mixes varying from pure reads to pure writes at 10% increments. Each mix is tested for up to 1 minute or 32GB of data transferred. The test is conducted with a queue depth of 4, and is limited to a 64GB span of the drive. In between each mix, the drive is given idle time of up to one minute so that the overall duty cycle is 50%.

Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write

The mixed random I/O performance of the Intel Optane SSD 900P is completely unmatched. The small Optane Memory M.2 is the second fastest drive we've tested, and the fastest flash-based SSD is only a third as fast as the Optane SSD overall.

At the very end of the test, when the workload shifts to pure random writes, Samsung's fastest SSDs are able to batch the writes and dramatically improve throughput, almost enough to catch up to the slowest speed the Optane SSD hits during this test.

Mixed Sequential Performance

Our test of mixed sequential reads and writes differs from the mixed random I/O test by performing 128kB sequential accesses rather than 4kB accesses at random locations, and the sequential test is conducted at queue depth 1. The range of mixes tested is the same, and the timing and limits on data transfers are also the same as above.

Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write

The Intel Optane SSD 900P doesn't quite dominate the mixed sequential I/O test to the extent that it trounced the competition in the mixed random I/O test, but it still breaks the record with a 40% higher average throughput than the fastest flash-based SSD.

The Optane SSD 900P's performance wavers a bit as the workload changes, but the general trend is a gradual reduction in performance as the proportion of writes increases. The flash-based SSDs tend to show an sharper decline in performance during the first half of the test, and the good ones recover most of that performance over the course of the second half. But the low performance in the middle of the test brings the averages way down and leaves the Optane SSD alone at the top.

Sequential Performance BAPCo SYSmark 2014 SE
Comments Locked

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Optane seems like a Joke not only in endurance, performance, but not power consumption too. Right now it's basically a bot for random 4K, you don't really need that, get the 960EVO/PRO.
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    *now.
  • AnnonymousCoward - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Why are you saying get the 960 PRO? It costs double a normal SSD and performs the same in real-world. Please enlighten me.
  • SunnyNW - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Would system start-up be any faster?
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Probably yes since it has higher random 4k read and latency. Wanna check the limit, search those old ramdisk booting times. Above that we would need a boot disk of L3 cache memory class, then one made up of L2 cache memory class, edram, etc.
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Till you reach L1 cache memory class or sram.
  • "Bullwinkle J Moose" - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    That depends....
    How fast is Fast?

    I've seen people bragging on youtube that their new 90+ Watt Quadcore Intel CPU will boot Win 10 to an M.2 EVO drive in 17-20 seconds....

    But my 35 Watt dualcore Sandy bridge will boot Windows 10 Fall Crappers Edition (Sept 2017) to an 850 Pro in 5.35 seconds.....

    or, the same machine will boot Windows XP-SP2 to the same 850 Pro in 3 - 4 seconds (Varies sleightly every boot)

    So, how fast is fast?
  • jabber - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Good luck to the couple of dozen or so that will be able to make proper use of this and notice a difference over a 850 EVO .
  • Pork@III - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    Do fast? Yes it is fast. Has volume? - Nope.
    I maked install of operation system and come to install FM7 on 128GB SSD and instalator say me: "not enough space". :(
  • nOOky - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link

    The 280 gig drive is priced similarly to the Samsung 830 Pro 256 gig when it came out if you're thinking the price is outrageous...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now