Benchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering Tests

Rendering tests are a long-time favorite of reviewers and benchmarkers, as the code used by rendering packages is usually highly optimized to squeeze every little bit of performance out. Sometimes rendering programs end up being heavily memory dependent as well - when you have that many threads flying about with a ton of data, having low latency memory can be key to everything. Here we take a few of the usual rendering packages under Windows 10, as well as a few new interesting benchmarks.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Corona 1.3: link

Corona is a standalone package designed to assist software like 3ds Max and Maya with photorealism via ray tracing. It's simple - shoot rays, get pixels. OK, it's more complicated than that, but the benchmark renders a fixed scene six times and offers results in terms of time and rays per second. The official benchmark tables list user submitted results in terms of time, however I feel rays per second is a better metric (in general, scores where higher is better seem to be easier to explain anyway). Corona likes to pile on the threads, so the results end up being very staggered based on thread count.

Rendering: Corona Photorealism

Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

LuxMark v3.1: Link

As a synthetic, LuxMark might come across as somewhat arbitrary as a renderer, given that it's mainly used to test GPUs, but it does offer both an OpenCL and a standard C++ mode. In this instance, aside from seeing the comparison in each coding mode for cores and IPC, we also get to see the difference in performance moving from a C++ based code-stack to an OpenCL one with a CPU as the main host.

Rendering: LuxMark CPU C++

POV-Ray 3.7.1b4: link

Another regular benchmark in most suites, POV-Ray is another ray-tracer but has been around for many years. It just so happens that during the run up to AMD's Ryzen launch, the code base started to get active again with developers making changes to the code and pushing out updates. Our version and benchmarking started just before that was happening, but given time we will see where the POV-Ray code ends up and adjust in due course.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

Cinebench R15: link

The latest version of CineBench has also become one of those 'used everywhere' benchmarks, particularly as an indicator of single thread performance. High IPC and high frequency gives performance in ST, whereas having good scaling and many cores is where the MT test wins out.

Rendering: CineBench 15 MultiThreaded

Rendering: CineBench 15 SingleThreaded

Benchmarking Performance: CPU Office Tests Benchmarking Performance: CPU Encoding Tests
Comments Locked

152 Comments

View All Comments

  • IGTrading - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    Thanks man , after 21 years in IT hardware I don't know ;)

    Have a fun life and enjoy your "wisdom" :)
  • whatevs - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    Seeing these new cpus released, sold and used I think Intel has a better idea of what it is doing than you.

    Good luck competing with Intel in your "experience in the industry" category.
  • 0ldman79 - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    I'm sure he'll be fine.

    He was here before the "165W" chip and I'm sure he'll be here long after it is gone, same as me.
  • ZeDestructor - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    Laptops and tablets break TDP all the time under Turbo loads. I don't see anyone bitching there...
  • 0ldman79 - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    It's really no different than if a car was sold with inadequate cooling.

    "Average" heat production at normal speeds is fine, but if you actually come close to using the 300HP the engine produces by, I dunno, pulling a trailer at those same speeds it will overheat and you'll have to pull over and let it cool.

    But sure, it's Intel, so it's cool...
  • HStewart - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    I have a still running dual Intel Xeon 3Gz 5160 and my biggest complaint is that the box is huge. This machine is 10 years old has 8G of memory and about 5T of storage. It CPU's alone cost around $2000 and in your terms it like the Bentley or my 2000 Toyota Tundra with Lexus Engine with 240,000. In essence you get what you pay for.
  • wolfemane - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    Hate to break it to ya but that Lexus motor IS a Toyota motor. And by going Lexus you way overpaid for a Toyota.
  • Garf75 - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    Ian, why are there no temperatures posted?
  • extide - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    Probably because they are highly dependant on the cooler used and the environment it is in. Not really relevant to an article like this.
  • Garf75 - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    Seriously? As a customer I would want to know if my cooling system is adequate for the job if I'm pushing the CPU.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now