Final Words

The Surface Pro lineup has always been one of the most powerful tablet class devices around. Microsoft is no longer marketing it as a tablet that can replace your laptop anymore though, and they’ve acknowledged that most of the customers who buy and use the Surface Pro are looking for an ultraportable laptop. That makes a lot of sense, since the Surface Pro weighs only 786 grams / 1.73 lbs for the Core i5 and i7 models, and the Signature Type Cover only adds another 310 grams / 0.68 lbs. As a complete package, it’s only 1.096 Kg / 2.41 lbs. It’s not the lightest device around, but it’s still very light and easy transport.

Packing a full 15 Watt U series Intel Core processor into such a small package has been a challenge in the past, but with improvements to both the cooling and the heat output of the CPU over the last couple of generations, it’s no longer the problem it once was. The CPU is able to run at full power in the new Surface Pro without throttling, although the new power modes will throttle it by default. This allows the Surface Pro to run almost silently for almost any task, yet still offer more processing speed than the outgoing model.

The design of the Surace Pro is mostly unchanged, if you consider the size, weight, and thickness. But the new design is softer in the hand, with rounded edges where the old models were more angular, and it is immediately noticeable when you pick it up. Surface Pro didn’t need a full redesign at all, so the small touches have done a great job without messing with what made Surface Pro so popular in the first place.

The display changes follow the same theme. It’s still the same size, and resolution, but the new display now features an “Enhanced sRGB” mode which brings a bit more vibrancy to the colors, without affecting skin tones. For color critical work, there’s still the sRGB mode, which has amazing color accuracy, but for those that are willing to sacrifice accuracy for a bit more punch, the new Surface Pro delivers that. And even in Enhanced sRGB mode, the average error level is still better than many machines on the market.

Battery life has also improved, mostly thanks to a larger capacity battery, but the new Kaby Lake chip likely helps as well. Surface Pro will always lag the best Ultrabooks in battery life, because it can’t compete on outright capacity, but Microsoft has done a great job again with platform efficiency.

The I/O port situation is not ideal, and here Microsoft seems to be taking a stand against USB-C and Thunderbolt 3, to the detriment of its customers. Offering the full-size USB port that is on there now is, without a doubt, the correct decision to make. But it seems like wasted space to offer a mini DisplayPort connecter over a USB-C port which could easily handle DisplayPort duties (and so much more). USB-C is a bit of a mess, with different ports providing different alt-mode functionality, and that will continue to be a problem, but it would have been great to see a fully capable USB-C port with Thunderbolt 3 for future connectivity. Intel has announced that they will be building more of that into their SoCs soon, so that would open the door to allowing this in future Surface Pro models without having to add extra chips on the motherboard.

Surface Pro’s accessories have always played a key role in its success, and the new Signature Type Cover with Alcantara fabric is very nice to use. Hopefully the polyurethane coating will increase durability as well. It’s available in three colors to match the Arc Mouse, and the new Surface Pen.

The Surface Pen improvements are surprisingly impressive. The existing pen on the Surface Pro 4, Book, and Studio, were all good quality digital pens, offering replaceable tips, and a fantastic traction on the display, but the new version really brings it to a new level. The sensitivity is quadrupled, from 1024 levels, to 4096, and the actuation force is decreased from 20 grams to just 9 grams, plus the new pen now supports tilt. The latency has also been reduced to just 21 ms, and from testing it out, it’s amazing how you can’t easily get the pen ahead of the ink now, where there was always a small lag before.

Microsoft didn’t need to revolutionize the Surface Pro, and rather than mess with what’s worked, they’ve continued to refine it. A softer design, a wider opening kickstand, and better accessories all bring the Surface Pro ahead of the pack again. Even after being on the market since November 2015, the Surface Pro 4 was arguably still the best product in this category, and the 2017 Surface Pro extends that lead.

Pricing makes the Surface Pro competitive, with a starting price of $799 for the Core m3 model with 4 GB of RAM and a 128 GB SSD. The base model is likely just to get people in the door though, and the Core i5 model with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD is likely the sweet spot, although it bumps the price up to $1299. The review model, with a Core i7, 16 GB of memory, and a 512 GB SSD creeps up to $2199, and the 1TB model is $2699. These prices don’t include the keyboard cover, which starts at $129.99 for the normal version, and goes up to $159.99 for the Signature edition. Compared to the Surface Pro 4, the prices are practically identical with looking at the launch prices, although the Core m3 model is $100 less expensive. The Surface Pen used to be included though, so overall, there’s a $60 price increase for most models if you used the pen. For an Ultrabook, its entry price is right in-line with the competition.

Wireless, Speakers, and Thermals
Comments Locked

124 Comments

View All Comments

  • North01 - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    Great review! Hopefully you can also review the i5 model, or at least comment on the performance of their new fanless design. While I've been hearing positive things, I would really like to know how it throttles when dealing with a heavy workload.
  • id4andrei - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    Only the Verge so far has received an i5 model and according to the reviewer it supposedly gets better battery life. The i7 allegedly suffers a 20% drop in battery life.
  • ryan.bunce - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    The previous Surface Pros were unable to drive dual 4K screens at 60Hz. Did you happen to test the new one with two 4K screens?
  • MattMe - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    This I did not know. Do you mean with the external Surface (4) dock?

    I'm sure I'd seen shots of people doing that. I've very sure I've seen it with the Surface Book, and that uses the same CPU SKUs at the Pro 4.
  • ryan.bunce - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    Yes with the dock, but also if you daisy chain the monitors together. Here's a couple of articles from folks who've noted it:

    http://tiamat.tsotech.com/surface-book-incapable-o...
    https://www.petri.com/run-two-4k-monitors-surface
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    This is a limitation of the Intel GPU. It only provides DisplayPort 1.2 streams, so you can only connect one UHD/60Hz display per stream. There are two though, since you can connect one on the dock, and one on the device itself, so you can run 2 UHD/60Hz but the cabling is a bit silly.
  • ryan.bunce - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    So must be the two port on the SP4 Dock are just daisy chained on the same channel. Makes sense - all the more reason why a thunderbolt port on the SP would be great.
  • soliloquist - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    I always wanted to see a detailed thermal/throttling test between the i5 and the i7 on the SP4 and would be even more interesting with the 2017 SP (since the i5 is fanless).

    Really wish you would have run the thermal test a little longer. In your original SP4 tests you really didn't see the thermal limits reached until around 25 mins (which is when you stopped testing this time).

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/9727/the-microsoft-s...

    From this article you say "The Iris does allow a lot more graphics potential, but for longer duration requirements, it may not offer much of an upgrade."

    This is what I would really like to see examined. Is the extra money for the i7 really worth it, particularly when longer durations are taken into account.

    Thanks for the great write up otherwise.
  • Brett Howse - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    I'll run a longer test and let you know how I make out. The temperatures were stable though so it *should* be the same, but I can try this and let you know.
  • soliloquist - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Thanks. Will look for it!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now