Benchmarking Performance: CPU Web Tests

One of the issues when running web-based tests is the nature of modern browsers to automatically install updates. This means any sustained period of benchmarking will invariably fall foul of the 'it's updated beyond the state of comparison' rule, especially when browsers will update if you give them half a second to think about it. Despite this, we were able to find a series of commands to create an un-updatable version of Chrome 56 for our 2017 test suite. While this means we might not be on the bleeding edge of the latest browser, it makes the scores between CPUs comparable.

SunSpider 1.0.2 [link]

The oldest web-based benchmark in this portion of our test is SunSpider. This is a very basic javascript algorithm tool, and ends up being more a measure of IPC and latency than anything else, with most high performance CPUs scoring around about the same. The basic test is looped 10 times and the average taken. We run the basic test 4 times.

Web: SunSpider on Chrome 56

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 [link]

Kraken is another Javascript based benchmark, using the same test harness as SunSpider, but focusing on more stringent real-world use cases and libraries, such as audio processing and image filters. Again, the basic test is looped ten times, and we run the basic test four times.

Web: Mozilla Kraken 1.1 on Chrome 56

Google Octane 2.0 [link]

Along with Mozilla, as Google is a major browser developer, having peak JS performance is typically a critical asset when comparing against the other OS developers. In the same way that SunSpider is a very early JS benchmark, and Kraken is a bit newer, Octane aims to be more relevant to real workloads, especially in power constrained devices such as smartphones and tablets.

Web: Google Octane 2.0 on Chrome 56

WebXPRT 2013 and 2015 [link]

While the previous three benchmarks do calculations in the background and represent a score, WebXPRT is designed to be a better interpretation of visual workloads that a professional user might have, such as browser based applications, graphing, image editing, sort/analysis, scientific analysis and financial tools. Web2013 is the older tool, superceded by Web2015, however both still are highly relevant for high-performance web applications today. 

Web: WebXPRT 13 on Chrome 56

Web: WebXPRT 15 on Chrome 56

Benchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering Tests Benchmarking Performance: CPU Encoding Tests
Comments Locked

254 Comments

View All Comments

  • Outlander_04 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    The information is out there
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VvwWTQKCZs
  • vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    That wasn't my point, readers shouldn't go elsewhere to compare with CPUs that are excluded due to bias.
  • Meteor2 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    What relevance has a $340 CPU got to a $250 CPU review?
  • vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    I'd say a ton more than the $499 Ryzen 7 1800x which didn't get excluded.
  • psychobriggsy - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    Yes, it's in the same product line, so people can see how it compares.

    Which seems to be roughly around 80% of the 1800X, for around half the price.
  • vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    And 7700k is more relevant for gaming which was the subject at hand so there you go.
  • Meteor2 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    You didn't answer my question...
  • vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    I just did, 7700k is more relevant than a 1800X in gaming benchmarks and as the competition it should've been included if a $499 CPU from AMD is included.
  • psychobriggsy - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    7700K is at a different price point, it rightly was compared in the Ryzen 7 reviews.

    Regardless, it would lose in the multithreaded benchmarks still, whilst having a small extra advantage in the gaming results.
  • vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link

    Ryzen 1800X is even more expensive than 7700k and yet got included in the gaming benchmarking, ironically considering 7700k is much more relevant for gaming.

    Sorry, but the bias and double standards are obvious in the article.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now