Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 3840x2160 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 will vex cards at 4K for at least one more generation. At 48.9fps, the GTX 1080 Ti is the fastest of the bunch, and is starting to approach the 60fps mark. Still, even with a 36% performance lead over the GTX 1080 and a 77% performance lead over the GTX 980 Ti, 60fps is a bit more than any one card can handle.

Battlefield 4 The Witcher 3
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • webdoctors - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    No, its because the dollar is worthless and real inflation is off the charts. Once we make the dollar great again, we'll see prices come down.
  • eddman - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    The only reason that we had $500 cards is because of the fierce competition from ATI back then.

    Whenever ATI's cards couldn't compete, or could but were not launched yet, nvidia jacked the prices up. I don't know why people forget the $600 8800 GTX or $650 GTX 280. Take a look at the link I posted above.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    What I miss is being able to buy a couple of well-priced mid-range cards that beat the high-end, with good scaling. I couldn't afford the 580 when it was new, but 2x 460 SLI was faster and served nicely for a good while. With support & optimisations moving away from SLI/CF though (lesser gains, more stuttering, costly connectors, unlock codes, etc.), a single good GPU is more attractive, but the cost way up the scale compared to 5 years ago.

    Have a look at the Anand review for the 280 though, it shows what I mean: 2x 8800GT SLI was faster than the 280, but $200 cheaper and with excellent scaling. I had 2x 8800GT 1GB before switching to the two 460s. Today, mid-range cards don't even support SLI (GTX 1060).

    Ian.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - link

    What about two RX480s? Can they top a 1080?
  • aryonoco - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    The 780 Ti was released in November 2013.

    The 1080 Ti is being released now, in March 2017.

    So 3.5 years later, Nvidia's flagship consumer card has improved 260% while using pretty much the same amount of power and generating pretty much the same level of noise.

    If this continues, I can see that in the next few years, all sort of software will find a way to utilise the GPU more, not just games and neural networks.

    Nvidia has a lot to be proud of. Their execution in the past few years has been Apple-esque.
  • Meteor2 - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    Reflected in their share price!
  • virtuastro - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    @Ryan Smith

    Can you test Intel i7 7700K, Intel-E Processors, and Ryzen 7 1800x with a GTX 1080ti in benchmark? :)
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Unfortunately no. We don't have a central office; I'm in the US with the GPUs, and Ian is in the UK with the CPUs. He's working on game testing for Ryzen Part 2, but we likely won't be able to include the GTX 1080 Ti.
  • virtuastro - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Aw dang. Thanks for answer anyway. :D
  • Meteor2 - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    FedEx?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now