Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 3840x2160 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 will vex cards at 4K for at least one more generation. At 48.9fps, the GTX 1080 Ti is the fastest of the bunch, and is starting to approach the 60fps mark. Still, even with a 36% performance lead over the GTX 1080 and a 77% performance lead over the GTX 980 Ti, 60fps is a bit more than any one card can handle.

Battlefield 4 The Witcher 3
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • ryvoth - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Solid card release from NVIDIA too bad our costs in Canada suck due to the dollar.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Ditto the UK. Sites keep mentioning an RRP of $700, but in the UK it's the equivalent of more like $900+.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - link

    Don't forget the US doesn't have VAT. Or a NHS.
  • Mr Perfect - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Wait, so Pascal is going to have a two year lifecycle as-is? There won't be a refinement cycle like Fermi to Kepler? That's a little disappointing.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Fermi technically had a 2-year lifecycle. The only reason it was special is because the original silicon had issues, and NV opted to fix it.

    There are still yearly product refreshes, but GPUs are too expensive to develop (and the underlying manufacturing process too slow to advance) to do top-to-bottom new GPUs every single year.
  • supcaj - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Disappointed to STILL not see ANY VR-related benchmarks in the suite. VR rendering has unique rendering requirements, and a huge margin of gamers have moved or are planning to move to VR during the lifetime of this card.
  • r3loaded - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Hey, 'member when top-tier GPUs costed $499? I 'member!
  • eddman - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    http://i.imgur.com/pGKlskP.png
  • Mr Perfect - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    I'd love to see how that compares father back, adjusted for inflation. My rose tinted goggles have me remembering top-tier GPUs launching for $400 or less back in the early 2000s, but who knows how that compares to 2017 dollars.
  • eddman - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    http://i.imgur.com/OU6612c.png

    There are a lot of inflation calculators online. Like this: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

    A geforce 2 ultra was $705 in 2017 dollars!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now