Battery Life

The OnePlus 3T has the same dimensions and mass as the OnePlus 3, but one of the internal changes is an increase in the battery capacity from 3000mAh to 3400mAh courtesy of improvements in battery density. This represents a capacity increase of slightly over 13%, and given that the OnePlus 3T has essentially the same hardware platform as the OnePlus 3 one can expect to see a corresponding increase in battery life due to the capacity increase alone. Any improvements in SoC efficiency and energy optimizations in the software could lead to even further improvements.

To examine the degree of improvement in battery life that the OnePlus 3T brings to the table I've run our standard set of battery benchmarks, which includes our web browsing battery test, and PCMark battery.

Web Browsing Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

In our web browsing battery test the OnePlus 3T lasts 16% longer than the OnePlus 3, which is slightly longer than you'd get by simply scaling to match the 13% increase in battery capacity. Of course, there's always a degree of variance, along with differences in power usage for different SoCs and different bins of the same SoC, and these factors play a role in the outcome of the test. In any case, the increase in battery capacity comes without an increase in mass or size, so it's really just an extra hour or so of web browsing without compromising any other parts of the phone.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

PCMark's battery life test runs through the same mix of tasks that emulate what users actually do with a device, so it provides a good idea of how much active usage a user can expect from a device. In this test the OnePlus 3T lasts 10% longer than the OnePlus 3, which is in line with the expected improvement from the increased battery capacity when you factor in slight differences in device platform power and test variance. This increase brings the OnePlus 3T slightly ahead of Samsung's Galaxy S7 Edge, which is a good improvement when one considers that the OnePlus 3 was beaten by the significantly smaller Exynos version of the Galaxy S7.

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal Battery Life

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal Final Frame Rate

GFXBench demonstrates that the throttling behavior for the GPU has been changed either with the OnePlus 3T or in a newer version of OxygenOS than was available when I reviewed the OnePlus 3. I plan to re-run this test on the OnePlus 3 when OxygenOS 3.5.1 is made available for it to see if the behavior has changed. Essentially, the phone now exhibits more throttling during the test. The OnePlus 3 dropped down to a nearly constant 30fps in the Manhattan battery test, which meant if it were a real game you'd have a playable frame rate. The OnePlus 3T doesn't do as well. It drops from its peak of 33fps down to 26fps within the first twenty minutes, and slightly past forty minutes into the test it begins to oscillate rapidly between 22fps and 25-26fps.

This behavior leads to a substantial increase in battery life, but comes at the cost of performance. If this were a real game, the performance would not be sufficient on the OnePlus 3T during its 3.5 hours of battery life, while the OnePlus 3 will have lasted only 2.15 hours but maintained a sufficient frame rate for the entirety of the session.

Charge Time

Recently we have run into issues with charge time testing due to new restri ctions introduced in Android Nougat. To get around these I developed an app that we will use internally for measuring charge time. This app uses the same data set as our previous methodology, but accesses it using Android's system APIs rather than by polling the files on the disk directly. This means the results are directly comparable to ones obtained in the past, and the methodology should continue to work for the foreseeable future assuming the device's manufacturer hasn't broken the API, which unfortunately has been the case on some devices that we've tested internally.

The OnePlus 3T still ships with Android Marshmallow, so the old method of battery life testing could still be applied. However, I felt that this would be a good time to get the ball rolling with our new testing app, and I just wanted to make it clear to interested readers that we have a solution in place so we do not again encounter the issues with testing this that we did when reviewing the Pixel XL.

Charge Time

As expected, the OnePlus 3T takes longer to charge than the OnePlus 3, with the increase being strongly correlated to the amount that the capacity of the battery has increased. Dash Charge is still incredibly quick though, so I don't think users will have any complaints about the phone taking too long to charge. The only downside is that Dash Charge being exclusive to OnePlus means that you can only charge quickly using OnePlus's special charger and cable. I think most users end up using the block provided with their phone, but it does mean that you won't get fast charging speeds when borrowing someone else's charger, and if you end up having to buy another you can't buy a charger that supports USB Power Delivery or Qualcomm Quick Charge and utilize fast charging.

GPU and NAND Performance Software: OxygenOS 3.5.1
Comments Locked

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • adityarjun - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    "The only change that actually does impact the user in a visible and meaningful way is the improved battery life."
    And the fact that you can't game on it anymore apparently.
  • xenol - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Any samples of the pictures the camera takes?
  • Ian Cutress - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    As mentioned directly in the review, the 3T shares a number of identical parts and software elements. One of these is the camera. We've only focused on the main changes for this review, rather than reposting most of the OP3 review again. So refer to the OP3 review :

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10411/the-oneplus-3-...
  • realbabilu - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    No love for front camera upgrade samples? Selfies anyone.
    I hope their night scene for main camera have been a little bit better at 3T,
  • Ironchef3500 - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Anybody else disappointed at the Pixel performance?
  • amdwilliam1985 - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Yep, I believe Anandtech is the only reputable website/source on the internet that didn't like the Pixel phones, everyone else is raving how great they are, including all the non-tech users. Well, I was so tempted to upgrade to Pixel XL after seeing all the youtube/website raves, thanks to Anandtech, I'm saving my money and going for the next version. I got a 6P, bought 2 pairs of dbrand skins on Black Friday, the new skins and Android 7.1.1 will make a new phone out of my 6P :)
    I guess Google is focusing on optimizing the user experience while everyone is still chasing after benchmarks(including Apple, T_T for Apple after Steve Jobs, next year Tim Crook will introduce 3 iPads with 4 iPhones for every possible market segmentation to make even more money that they'll never use).
  • Techgeek43 - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Brandon, great article, as always. One question I have, is it a mimo chip on the WiFi ? Does it have top speed of 433 or 867 ?
  • Brandon Chester - Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - link

    433Mbps. I've added that to the chart on the first page as well.
  • Techgeek43 - Wednesday, November 30, 2016 - link

    Thank you
  • zepi - Monday, November 28, 2016 - link

    Any change that Anandtech could take a look at OLED burn-in / durability issues? There is lot of talk about this and I've personally seen many oled phones / tablets in shops having clear burn-in issues, but afaik no big tech-site has done real reviews.

    Ie. source 1 and 2 year old used daily-driver OLED phones that you've reviewed earlier and run the display calibration benchmarks again. It'd be interesting to see how well Galaxy S5's and S6'es fare after being used 1-2 years in terms of max brightness, image retention and colour balance.

    Obviously, it wouldn't hurt to run comparison measurements from a similarly aged LCD phone like iPhone 6 or something like that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now