System Performance

One of the key internal changes that the OnePlus 3T brings to the table is a move from Snapdragon 820 to 821. At a high level, Snapdragon 821 is very similar to 820, and in the case of the OnePlus 3T it's really differentiated by its higher peak frequencies for the CPU and the GPU. Both have four of Qualcomm's Kryo cores in a 2 + 2 cluster configuration, and both use Qualcomm's Adreno 530 GPU. In the OnePlus 3 the performance cluster on the CPU had a peak frequency of 2.15GHz, which is brought up to 2.35GHz on the OnePlus 3T. On paper, this gives a performance improvement of roughly 10%, which is also what Qualcomm states in their marketing materials.

PCMark - Web Browsing

PCMark - Video Playback

PCMark - Writing

PCMark - Photo Editing

PCMark - Work Performance Overall

PCMark is a test that the OnePlus 3 performed exceptionally well in. This was due not only to the use of Snapdragon 820, but to software optimizations that OnePlus had made to the OS and the Android Runtime as well. The OnePlus 3T continues this trend, and provides performance improvements across the board. The writing and photo editing tests are the most interesting of the group, as these are tests where software optimizations helped the OnePlus 3 to pull ahead of other competing devices, and the OnePlus 3T pulls ahead even further. It bests the Huawei Mate 8 in the writing test to become the fastest device on record, and the photo editing test improves over the OnePlus 3 which was still the fastest device in the test up until now.

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2015 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

JetStream 1.1 (Chrome/Safari)

The OnePlus 3T's JavaScript performance benefits from improvements that Google has made in Chrome 54, as well as the increase in peak CPU frequency compared to the OnePlus 3. In the interest of having a fair comparison, I've updated the OnePlus 3's results using the latest version of Chrome so it can also take advantage of optimizations that have been made.

Kraken and WebXPRT 2015 both demonstrate the OnePlus 3T's improved JavaScript performance. The gap is actually a bit larger than one might expect from a 10% increase in CPU frequency, and this could simply be the result of other changes made to the operating system in the newer version of OxygenOS, or changes to the DVFS settings that have been made alongside the change in SoC. Jetstream shows a smaller improvement, but it's in line with what you'd expect to see from the CPU bump.

Ultimately, Snapdragon 821 doesn't come with any mind-blowing performance improvements for CPU-bound applications, but the update does keep OnePlus on par with the competition, and allows them to take advantage of improvements in efficiency and errata fixes in addition to a modest performance uplift. Certain parts of the PCMark test also indicate that the 3T comes with additional improvements at the software level, which will hopefully make their way to the OnePlus 3 with the next major update to OxygenOS, but for now are something you only get on the OnePlus 3T.

Display: Re-Revisited GPU and NAND Performance
Comments Locked

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • AbRASiON - Thursday, December 1, 2016 - link

    Still no wireless charging? It's nearly 2017,.........
  • negusp - Thursday, December 1, 2016 - link

    Its not really necessary especially with quick charge. I mean, its a relatively useful feature but few people use it and its a hassle to incorporate.
  • Saihtam - Tuesday, December 6, 2016 - link

    "No wireless charging in nearly #NextYear" doesn't really make sense.

    Wireless charging has been out there for years now and it kind of sucks.
    I had it on my Nexus 5 but I don't miss it one bit since migrating to the OnePlus 3 with Dash Charging.
  • leexgx - Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - link

    i like wireless charging but never used it myself (i guess main issue is 500ma charge compared to 2-3A on Quick charge 2-3 phone) guess its good for overnight charge or when your at work you put it down on the charge pad saving the USB port from repeated use and accidental damage

    with my CUBOT H1 had fast charge as takes like 3 hours to charge from empty but lasts 7 hours "Real" screen on time so less an issue , the S5 charges 90% in about 1hour (i have to charge it again once or twice in the day due to my use, most people seem to have to recharge once in a day to top it up)
  • kyaaaaaaaaaa - Friday, December 2, 2016 - link

    Is there a chance that they will ever use a physical home button again? Also if there is one more camera shutter button and all buttons are all programmable it would be GREAT.
  • sinsin - Monday, December 5, 2016 - link

    One area that wasn't touched was wheather the new ISP for 821 improves the camera experience?
  • blomquist - Tuesday, December 6, 2016 - link

    Why do you still use this meaningless display tests. I've found every iPhone to have a mediocre screen since I got my private Nexus 5. Since then I had a Honor 6 Plus, a Oneplus X an now I'm using a ZUK Z2 Pro. Provided from my company I had a Iphone 4, 5 and now a 6s - How blind eyed has one to be to not find the iPhones having a mediocre display? I mean they are really shitty, the Honor 6+ still beats them all regarding the display quality.
  • vampyren - Monday, December 12, 2016 - link

    This top of the line phone cost $439 and the conclusion focuses on $40 price increase :) its just funny. I understand the comparison against the base prist of OP3 but still.
  • RACE9f - Wednesday, December 14, 2016 - link

    a glowing review. Having been trying to buy this since the day this article came out, it seems the phone is vaporware. the support for this firm is really shaky, they only answer a phone call even occasionally and will not take any email unless you already have bought one!
  • danitkd - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Why in srgb the white is yellow than in ntsc (profile default?)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now