Video Performance

While still images probably constitute a significant portion of what a smartphone camera is used for, video performance still remains important as anything moving or with a notable sound requires video or something that is but quite isn’t a video. In order to test video performance, we use direct comparison with two devices recording simultaneously on the same rig.

iPhone 7 Video Encode Settings
  Video Audio
1080p30 16 Mbps H.264 High Profile 86 Kbps, 44.1 KHz AAC
1080p60 25 Mbps H.264 High Profile 86 Kbps, 44.1 KHz AAC
4kP30 48 Mbps H.264 High Profile 86 Kbps, 44.1 KHz AAC
1080p120 38 Mbps H.264 High Profile 86 Kbps, 44.1 KHz AAC
720p240 38 Mbps H.264 High Profile 86 Kbps, 44.1 KHz AAC

Before we get into the actual results I want to discuss the video encode settings. It's kind of interesting to see how the iPhone only records mono audio, which I suspect is a function of not having enough microphones to do noise cancellation and useful stereo recording. It's also interesting to see how Apple can actually encode AVC High Profile for all video – including 4kP30 at 48 Mbps – which is more than I can say for a number of high-end flagships this year. This suggests that the encode blocks are capable of keeping up without any strange problems.

1080p30 Video

Looking at 1080p30 video I'm just profoundly disappointed by how high-end Android devices perform in comparison. The state of affairs here is so depressing there's really no reason to compare 1080p60, 4K, or slow motion capture because it's clear to me that something is just fundamentally broken (or consistently misconfigured) with Snapdragon 820's encode blocks. Even casual examination reveals massive macroblocking any time the sky comes into view, which is something we've consistently seen with the HTC 10, Galaxy S7, LG G5, and OnePlus 3. Other than this, the LG G5 and Galaxy S7 both have extremely oversaturated color rendition which just doesn't represent reality. The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly have better output than any other Android device. The iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 7 with the 28mm focal length camera perform quite similarly to the iPhone 6s Plus other than some improvements in dynamic range and noise reduction, so I'd refer back to the iPhone 6s review for those interested in learning about how the iPhone 7 stacks up because the state of the art in Android has not progressed since then.

OIS Video

In the interest of trying for completeness anyways, I also tested image stabilization performance. Relative to the Galaxy S7 we continue to see how the lack of software stabilization to go with the hardware stabilization leads to really shaky and jerky footage when recording while walking. The iPhone 7 still shows large motions, but it's much smoother and also handles wind noise better. The HTC 10 is much more competitive with the iPhone 7 here but I would say that Apple's software stabilization appears to be slightly better and the lack of PDAF on the HTC 10 camera is definitely noticeable in the focus transition testing but it's important to keep in mind that the HTC 10 has no software stabilization if you enable 4K video. The LG G5 has basically all of the same traits as the Galaxy S7 in this test and needs improvement in all of the same areas as a result. If you're upgrading from either the iPhone 6, 6 Plus, or 6s you're going to also see a major improvement as the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus both have OIS which works with the software stabilization to maximize the reduction in hand shake when capturing video.

I also went ahead and tested the iPhone 7 Plus with some quick footage to see what difference it provides when capturing video, and it's fairly obvious that the secondary camera lacks OIS but also dramatically increases captured detail which makes it useful for static shots where you can avoid inducing hand shake but its utility rapidly decreases in low light or high hand shake conditions.

Overall, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remain the best phones on the market for video capture. Strange issues with Snapdragon 820 video encode blocks mean that all Snapdragon 820 devices are just barely passable for video capture. Considering how OEMs have had almost a decade to get this right, it is truly incredible that phones costing 600 US dollars still have these obvious problems, and that Apple remains among the few to get it right.

Still Image Performance Software UX: iOS 10 and Haptics
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • Fidelator - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    Though it is worth noting that android OEMs really need better SoCs, for 4 product cycles Apple's SoCs have been vastly superior and nearly unmatched in most scenarios, with the 820 Qualcomm seems to have gone back to the right route but it's performance still leaves a lot of room for improvement
  • MadaMadaDesu - Thursday, October 20, 2016 - link

    "you could argue that the camera on the G5 provides superior, unmatched detail because it fits way more in the frame than any other camera providing more content and therefore more detail about the situation."

    If what you say is true, all professional photographers and others need is a single ultrawide lens? Why then, would the pros, especially a sports photographer, need a small army of super-telephotos that sometimes cost more than $10,000 each? Hey, just snap with an ultra wide, you captured way more!

    Except sometimes you want a close up of a single ball player, not a picture of the 50,000 people in the stadium.
  • uceejay - Wednesday, October 19, 2016 - link

    How much time it takes to charge iPhone 7 and 7 plus with 12W iPad adapter?
  • tipoo - Wednesday, October 19, 2016 - link

    What size iPhone did you test? GSMArena showed for one that the 128GB model is much faster, and two that the 32GB model is much slower at writes

    http://www.gsmarena.com/the_32gb_iphone_7_plus_use...
  • Harry_Wild - Monday, October 24, 2016 - link

    Read most of the comments and it appears that the iPhone 7 is selling well based on the out of stock data! Just because it not technologically the best does not mean people have gave up buying it! It is a luxury item and most buyers do not think about it in theses terms. They just want it at Apple prices!
  • bw13121 - Sunday, October 30, 2016 - link

    I'm waiting for the Iphone 7 deep dive mentioned for release at the end of the month- that leaves today! Come on Anandtech, get this A10 dissected
  • darwiniandude - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    First page table is wrong in that the 56mm f2.8 is not OIS
  • hassanmm - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    Brand new Original Apple iphone 7 and 7 plus cost 650usd with 1year warranty.

    Serious buyer should contant us.

    Whatsapp CHAT or Call : +447405502988 or 00447405502988
  • Vanguy79 - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    They can afford a deep dive for Google pixel phone but not for iPhone 7?
  • douglerner - Saturday, November 19, 2016 - link

    I find my new iPhone 7 Plus display noticeably dimmer and "dingier" than my iPhone 6 Plus display in all lighting situations. I went to exchange and the exchange unit was even dimmer. Currently Apple is "looking into it" and were supposed to get back to me by the end of the week. Generally I like the phone features and speed. But the fact the screen is not as advertised and is, in fact, dimmer than my iPhone 6 Plus irks me.

    You can see more details and my side-by-side photos at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7744754

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now