Conclusion

Corsair added the Carbide 600Q to their ranks as a case with a minimalistic appearance and similarly minimalistic noise. Aesthetics are a highly subjective matter, so the minimalistic design of the case will probably be a bit polarizing; some will love the minimalistic, plain design, whereas others will be comparing it to a refrigerator. In terms of quality, the Carbide 600Q is an excellent product, built from high quality materials and with a very well designed, mechanically strong chassis.

Under the hood, the system area of the Carbide 600Q is roomy, offering excellent hardware compatibility and maintenance comfort. Aside from its stock cooling fans, the Carbide 600Q also offers a plethora of options for liquid cooling support. The case can support a radiator up to 280 mm long at the front of the case, up to 360 mm long at the bottom of the case, and up to 140 mm long at the rear of the case. This allows for various combinations of multiple all-in-one liquid coolers as well, such as, for example, one for the CPU installed to the bottom of the case and one for the GPU installed to the rear of the case.

However it should be noted that the Carbide 600Q is limited in terms of drives support, as the maximum number of drives that can be installed is relatively low. The majority of system builders should be satisfied with the number of drives that this case can support - two 3.5" drives and a trio of 2.5" SSDs - but it clearly was not designed for systems that require a large number of drives. Considering the mediocre thermal performance within the 3.5” drive area, the 3.5” slots are probably bsed used with low RPM/low power disks, such as efficient consumer-grade drives that have been designed with simple data storage in mind.

Perhaps the best feature of the case and one that seems that is not getting enough attention in the company’s marketing is its exceptional thermal performance. The Carbide 600Q, with a size comparable to most typical ATX designs, outperformed much larger cases that have been designed with thermal performance as their primary focus. The Carbide 600Q also has excellent noise reduction capabilities but, of course, Corsair’s marketing quote that the Carbide 600Q will always be whisper-quiet “no matter what’s running inside” is an exaggeration. Even our 44.2 dB(A) dummy load would still be unnervingly loud for users that seek to build a silent setup. A truly quiet system requires the careful selection of every component - the Carbide 600Q will help, but it definitely is unable to make a loud build suddenly go quiet.

In summary, Corsair designed the Carbide 600Q to entice advanced users that want a high quality and versatile case with excellent thermal performance and sound dampening capabilities but, at the same time, prefer a subtle and elegant appearance over a fancy design that instantly stands out. The Carbide 600Q excellently combines all of these features but, unsurprisingly, the designer could not keep the cost of such a product very low. With a retail price of $140, the Carbide 600Q is a relatively expensive product, but one that we would wholeheartedly recommend to users that require both excellent quality and overall performance from a product that they plan on keeping for years to come.

Testing & Results
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • davegraham - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    It's "inverted" not "inverse." Please, for the love of all that's good and holy, grammar check these articles.
  • E.Fyll - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    Well, Corsair wants to call it "inverse". And who am I to argue? It's their product, they can baptize it however they want.
  • Margaronis - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    I was going to say the same- maybe inversed means it's been through some transformation in the 5th dimension
  • Batmeat - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    Found my new case for my next build... Quiet water cooled gaming/media server machine.
  • Impulses - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    The case would work just as well right side up as inverted imo, and the biggest factor that would favor one or the other is CPU load vs GPU(s) load, which varies from system to system and workload to workload.

    The biggest thing it has going for it is the direct path for airflow, regardless of whether any odd the components are below or atop. Not having bays in front of the mobo and having two large fans blowing directly over it should just be standard by now on any case not meant to house half a dozen drives.

    The inverted design facilitates that to an extent by making better use of space and having the PSU in line with the external bays that are too often jammed in front of the CPU area, but it's not the only way to achieve this.

    Direct airflow probably has more to do with it's thermal performance than any notion of hot air rising significantly thru such a small and well vented case. Otherwise they'd have a vented top or a 90 degree design.
  • Footman36 - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    It's not such a great case for watercooling. Space is limited for rads. I managed to squeeze a 240mm at the front and a 140mm at the bottom.
    [img]https://goo.gl/photos/jJNyE7RLXa95fmDJA[/img]
  • bigboxes - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    Nice looking rig. Are the drives hidden by the black panels?
  • bigboxes - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    Nm... I actually saw the interior pics in the article. I have a Lian Li case that has a place for a couple of 2.5" and one 3.5" on the backside of the mobo tray. Again, nice build.
  • Batmeat - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link

    Tight fit but it looks good
  • mattlach - Monday, September 12, 2016 - link


    Nice case.

    Man do I wish revcontent style ads were banned though. They are so obnoxious. I hate that click bait nonsense.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now