The Test

For our review of the GTX 1060, we’re using NVIDIA’s 368.81 driver. Our 2016 benchmark suite is otherwise identical to how it was described in our GTX 1080 review.

Meanwhile I’ve gone ahead and included a spectrum of cards, not only contemporary competitors like the Radeon RX 480 8GB, but also historical cards such as the GTX 760 and GTX 660, to give us an idea of how performance has improved in this segment over the generations.

CPU: Intel Core i7-4960X @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard: ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
Power Supply: Corsair AX1200i
Hard Disk: Samsung SSD 840 EVO (750GB)
Memory: G.Skill RipjawZ DDR3-1866 4 x 8GB (9-10-9-26)
Case: NZXT Phantom 630 Windowed Edition
Monitor: Asus PQ321
Video Cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
ASUS ROG Strix GTX 1060 OC
AMD Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD RAdeon R9 380X
AMD Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon HD 7970
Video Drivers: NVIDIA Release 368.81
AMD Radeon Software Crimson 16.7.2 (RX 480)
AMD Radeon Software Crimson 16.7.1 (All Else)
OS: Windows 10 Pro
Meet the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC Rise of the Tomb Raider
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ryan Smith - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Since there is no standard benchmark, it depends on the area you use. We purposely picked a section of the game that would be among the most demanding.
  • Arbie - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    I really want to 'need' a new graphics board for FPS gaming. But I can't find any such games worth playing that need one. They're all console ports with mediocre graphics and even worse mechanics. And my GTX 770 is more than enough even on 2560x1440. I still read about the new cards but... how long...
  • Simplex - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    "And my GTX 770 is more than enough even on 2560x1440"
    So you play at sub-30 fps and/or low details?
  • Arbie - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    Simplex - Can't see how you jumped to that conclusion, so I guess you're just trying to be contentious. FOR THE GAMES I *DO* PLAY the 770 is fine. That's my point, and the reason I personally am not in the market.

    I don't check frames per sec unless the gameplay is laggy. When it is - which is rare with the 770 - I dial down the eye-candy. Beyond a certain point that doesn't matter anyway, compared to game design & mechanics. The problem is that there are NO NEW FPS GAMES that deliver on those two aspects. My benchmark game is Crysis (and its siblings) which I run at "Very High" settings. There are a few games now with equally good graphics, but nothing even compares for fluidity, control, physics, level design, AI quality etc etc. Until there is, I won't need a new card. I wish it were otherwise.
  • just4U - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    A note for Nvidia since they will likely read these comments (..as will AMD)

    I've said there is a market for a reference design using a stylish reference cooler (like what you see on the Titan series..) For some it's worth the $50 admission. If your going to do that at the lower end but charge a premium... make sure it's got the same goodness as the upper end models.

    Your 1060 Founders might sell.. but it won't sell as well as it could have if you'd gone all out on the cooler like you have for the higher end models. Plastic? Ugh.. No full backplate? Please.. Come on!
  • AnnonymousCoward - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Now that you mention it, I've got a note for NVIDIA too: support the VESA standard Adaptive-Sync already! My monitor supports it, why won't you.
  • Gigaplex - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    If they do that, then there would be no reason for manufacturers to produce G-SYNC monitors. They'd all flock to Freesync compliance.
  • Beararam - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Great review, Ryan. Hope all the negative comments don't bring you down. Probably a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't see.
  • VulkanMan - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Why no encoding tests?
    Both camps support H.265 HEVC encoding & decoding.
  • Ryan Smith - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    I've looked into it, but I haven't found any good encoding tests right now, particularly those that use HEVC. But if you happen to come across something, then I'm all ears.=)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now