Video Performance

Now that we've discussed how the HTC 10 does on still images we can go over how well it does for video recording. There have been a lot of cases where a smartphone can take great images but the video quality is often appalling and pretty much an afterthrought. In order to try and see how the HTC 10 does we can start by looking at the kind of encode settings that the HTC 10 uses.

HTC 10 Video Encode Settings
  Video Audio
1080p30 20 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
4K30 56 Mbps H.264 High Profile 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
720p120 24 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC

Right off the bat things are a little concerning here. For some reason HTC is using AVC Baseline for encode in 1080p30 and 1080p60 is absent altogether. I'm not sure why this is but really neither of those things should be the case. 720p120 also uses AVC Baseline which really shouldn't be the case. Interestingly enough, HTC has also included the ability to record video with FLAC audio which results in an mkv file output instead of an mp4 but as far as I can tell nothing else seems to change as far as video encode settings go.

1080p30 Video

In 1080p30 video HTC manages to pull off an interesting trick, which is that their video is actually properly stabilized instead of whatever is going on with the Galaxy S7 and G5. I would say that the color is also a little more accurate from what I saw at the time of recording but without a proper ColorChecker chart I can't really prove this assertion. At this point the HTC 10 and OnePlus 3 both have strange issues with artifacting around the sky that makes me wonder whether the Snapdragon 820 has some sort of issue with the encode blocks leading to such poor quality. Audio quality with FLAC is just clearly superior here though.

4K30 Video

In 4K30 the HTC 10 unfortunately loses the software stabilization so the result is basically just as shaky as the Galaxy S7 and by extension the Note7. Even using AVC High profile I can still see strange artifacts in the sky which is really strange. Audio capture continues to be better as far as suppressing wind noise goes than Galaxy S7, likely due to the use of dual level microphones similar to what we saw in the One M7. I would say color rendition is more accurate here as well but this is a subjective observation. The iPhones 6s continues to be one of the best phones for 4K30 capture almost entirely because it actually has the ISP throughput to process 4K video properly.

Slow Motion Video

In 720p120 the HTC 10 really starts to show its weakness. I suspect we're dealing with some kind of sensor limitation here because 4K30 is possible but for some reason 720p240 isn't. Color rendition is mildly cooler here as well relative to the Galaxy S7 but detail isn't great here and obviously it isn't going to be able to capture motion as well as anything with 240 FPS capture. The iPhone 6s would obviously beat it here by virtue of its 1080p120 capture.

Overall, video capture is somewhat disappointing on the HTC 10. It definitely isn't unusable and the FLAC audio is a compelling addition along with proper 1080p30 video stabilization, but things like poor slow motion capture and some strange artifacting and poor encode profiles mar the experience. Relative to something like the Galaxy S7 I would say that 1080p30 and 4K30 capture are clearly superior, but 720p120 and the utter lack of 1080p60 video means that depending upon what you use the camera for the HTC 10 can end up falling short of the competition. 720p240, 1080p60 for next year as well as AVC High Profile across the board would be great to see and would resolve a lot of the issues here.

Looking at the camera overall, I think the HTC 10 is very much the equal of the Galaxy S7 as far as camera goes. The Galaxy S7 and Note7 have incredible user experience due to the sheer speed of capture and focus, but the image quality, oil painting-esque processing, and somewhat off color rendition in a lot of cases means that the HTC 10 can give you a better result if you can tap to focus properly and possibly adjust the exposure metering. It definitely could use some work to clean up the details and loose ends, but HTC has finally shipped a camera that they can be proud of and lives up to the promise of the marketing and specs.

Still Image Performance Software UX: HTC Sense
Comments Locked

183 Comments

View All Comments

  • zeeBomb - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    The days when the M7 got that gold plaque from Anandtech...will we be seeing that type of success here for HTC again?
  • Zoomer - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Good point. What about the silver and bronze plaques?
  • Meteor2 - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Josh, you ask what makes a good display -- I'd say brightness of at least 400 nits (500 to be great), at least sRGB coverage, accurate white and low delta E -- I.e., accuracy. The one thing you don't test which makes a big difference is reflectance. That's the critical factor when using a screen in sunlight.
  • fanofanand - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    This seems like an excellent phone, for $400. The days of $700 flagships are nearly over. When the difference between the high-end and mid-range are a few percent, I do not see why consumers should pay nearly double.
  • Death666Angel - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    As long as a lot of people get their phones through contracts that hide the true cost over a 2 year monthly payment, it won't.
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    Those days seem to be coming to an end as well. T-Mobile has been incredibly disruptive in the mobile carrier space. I hope the trend continues which theoretically should bring phone prices down to earth. I know they house a ton of technology in a tiny package, but it's a little bit crazy that a phone costs more than a semi-decent laptop which has dramatically more functionality. Of course there is the portability aspect I'm not delusional, smaller everything costs more to package but there is little sense of value in today's flagships.
  • Impulses - Thursday, September 22, 2016 - link

    People in the U.S. still rely on payment plans a lot, which goes a long way towards hiding the total cost and keeping them buying phones from carriers.
  • Vagabondjonez - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Oh man am I dreaming?
  • Aenean144 - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Really liked the measurement of WiFi performance. Nice Job!

    It probably doesn't matter much, as most consumers would be gated by their broadband bit rates which are typically much less than 100 mbit/s, but it was lovely to see. Those high bit rates are really nice for video transfers from the computer though.

    I would recommend using fixed x and y axis ranges for the plots. If the point of the plots are for comparison, and basically that's the purpose of a plots, you should either co-plot the data from the devices are minimally have fixed axis ranges.

    I wonder if the differences are really about design decisions. So, Apple optimized for high bandwidth, and it resulted in a quicker fall off at lower signal levels? And vice versa for the HTC 10 and Samsung device?
  • JeffFlanagan - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    I used to be an HTC fan long ago, but the quality of their phones had been in decline for a long time. Add to that my experience with their non-existent customer support on the Vive, and they've become a company that I avoid wherever possible.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now