Photos

The Photos application for OS X was unveiled alongside OS X Yosemite, but while Yosemite launched in the second half of 2014 it wasn't until mid-2015 that the Photos app was officially released. Photos provided a great way to organize all the photos that users take on their iOS devices, and integration with iCloud and the new iCloud Photo Library was clearly something kept in mind during the development process, while Apple's previous attempt to integrate iCloud into iPhoto using Photo Stream felt like a tacked on feature.

While Photos and iCloud Photo Library provide a simple way to make photos accessible across all Apple devices, they haven't done much to help with organizing those photos. Apart from the most basic categorization like automatic albums for panoramas, selfies, burst photos, etc, the only automatic detection based on the content of a photo is the Faces album which tries, not always successfully, to generate an album containing photos where people's faces are visible. Around the same time, Google launched Google Photos, which employs machine learning to do image analysis which enables categorization and search on sets of photos based on the contents of the photos themselves.

With Photos for macOS Sierra and iOS Apple is now employing machine learning as well. Much like Google Photos, you can now search for photos based on the content within them, and the app will now generate groupings of photos that are related. The search generally works as expected, although there are limitations to what sort of objects the system has been trained to recognize. The most interesting situation I found was the one above, where it correctly distinguished between a normal cake and a birthday cake and presented two separate search results where the birthday cake result had only the cake images where the happy birthday text writting in icing was visible.

For photo organization there's a new feature called Memories. These are essentially groupings of photos that are related based on context and metadata. At this point the feature has only generated one memory for me, but I have a number of images from trips and events in my iCloud Photo Library and I'm not sure why it hasn't generated one for those as well. The memory it did generate was of my trip to Ireland and Northern Ireland, and it grouped the photos taken at a park there by me and a friend of mine.

Apple also has a new editing option called Brilliance. This setting essentially works to improve the exposure of an image selectively by brightening darker areas but leaving properly exposed areas as they are. For instance, it may lighten a harsh shadow significantly while only slightly adjusting the well-lit area. This slider can be thought of as one that automatically applies the other adjustments that are available individually in order to achieve a certain result. I don't do any photo editing in the macOS or iOS Photos apps, but I suppose that the ultimate goal with consumer photo editing has been making a single-action system for fixing issues with images, with Brilliance being like a more fine-grained version of one click auto adjustment features.

Messages

At WWDC there were a number of new features shown for the Messages application on iOS that will be coming in iOS 10. Given that iMessage exists on both iOS and macOS, it makes sense that support for these features is coming to Sierra as well. The situation isn't as simple as one might think, as while you can receive messages using all the new features on a Mac, you can't send messages that make use of features provided by iMessage apps, and you can't use some of the features that were designed for the multi-touch interface of iOS.

The core interface of Messages is pretty much unchanged. Right now Apple has changed the default contact avatar, but these kinds of changes often change multiple times over the course of the iOS and macOS beta cycle. In the screenshot above you can see Apple's new 3x emoji. When sending emoji alongside text the message renders at its typical size, so this just applies to messages that only have emoji in them. The display of messages that have links is also much better. Previously they simply displayed the link as text, which felt really antiquated compared to apps like Skype and Hangouts that give you a preview, and now iMessage does the same.

Messages for macOS includes support for the new message effects that will be coming in iOS 10. There are effects to make messages that scale up in size to emphasize loudness, or come in with the text obscured until you wipe the effect away to reveal the text. You can receive these messages on macOS, but you cannot apply them to the messages that you send.

The one feature that does make its way to macOS is support for placing a reaction on a message. By long clicking on a message you open a menu that has a number of responses. Applying one of these to a message applies an icon on the corner of the message corresponding to the reaction, and options like the humor reaction provide a good way to cut down on the number of messages that simply say "lol".

I do feel that Apple could have found a way to implement more of the new iMessage features in the macOS Messages app. For example, you could implement message effects on macOS with a simple tooltip menu or a popover, even if the interface still does work better within the multitouch interface of iOS. On the other hand, when I send messages on macOS I tend to just type it in and hit enter to send, and I probably wouldn't end up using the message effects as much as on iOS due to the greater friction in the interface. I can see how the decision may have come down to weighing the balance between the engineering effort required and how well it would actually work on a desktop or laptop.

Storage Optimization and iCloud Integration Final Words
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • melgross - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    I hope y;ire just kidding. If you look at the percentage of Apple stuff here, y;I'll se that it is right where it should be. I don't complain about all the Microsoft stuff, or all the Google stuff. I don't complain about all the reviews of obscure things done here that almost no one will every buy.

    The only time I've every been annoyed with that is when it took months for the full review of an Apple product to come out, when the preview review came out right away. But this is a big thing, believe it or not, and a lot of us ARE interested.
  • KoolAidMan1 - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    So go read other articles posted then. You whiners are insufferable
  • renstein - Friday, July 15, 2016 - link

    I just came from the front page. 3 links to Apple related stories, 25 to non Apple related stories. I'm pretty sure there were other phone reviews there too.
  • RaichuPls - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    So where's the GTX1080 in depth look and review? Any article on the GTX1070? 1080 is nearing 2 months at this point, at least it got a preview. Nothing for the GTX1070 whatsoever, and it's been 1 month too. Are you guys just going to ignore them like you guys have the GTX950/960? Where reviews were promised but never delivered?

    How about phones, where's the HTC10 review?

    Come on what the fuck Anandtech? Release day reviews?
  • colonelclaw - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Let me guess, by day you're a motivational speech writer?
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    11 AT-length pages of architecture/features are now done. So it's nearing completion.
  • RaichuPls - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Alright man, thanks for replying. Hopefully I've got something to look forward to.
  • Impulses - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Now you've done it Ryan, prepare to be tracked and measured on a page/day metric until the review is out...
  • fanofanand - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Not true, he told us a week ago it was almost finished, that cat was already out of the bag.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    People either have warmed memories, haven't been around long enough, or just choose to ignore that late but often the most detailed has always been the mantra here, Anand or not.

    Other reviews may be out sooner but 95% of them don't go too deep.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now