Performance Metrics - I

The Intel Core m3-6Y30 Compute Stick was evaluated using our standard test suite for low power desktops / industrial PCs. Not all benchmarks were processed on all the machines due to updates in our testing procedures. Therefore, the list of PCs in each graph might not be the same. In the first section, we will be looking at SYSmark 2014, as well as some of the Futuremark benchmarks.

BAPCo SYSmark 2014

BAPCo's SYSmark 2014 is an application-based benchmark that uses real-world applications to replay usage patterns of business users in the areas of office productivity, media creation and data/financial analysis. Scores are meant to be compared against a reference desktop (HP ProDesk 600 G1 with a Core i3-4130, 4GB RAM and a 500GB hard drive) that scores 1000 in each of the scenarios. A score of, say, 2000, would imply that the system under test is twice as fast as the reference system.

Since SYSmark 2014 was not processed on any of of the PCs in our comparison list, we present the scores obtained in the three iterations of the benchmark above. Obviously, a 7.5W TDP Skylake Core M is no match for a 54W Haswell Core i3. However, it still manages to delivery more than 70% of its performance for business workloads.

Futuremark PCMark 8

PCMark 8 provides various usage scenarios (home, creative and work) and offers ways to benchmark both baseline (CPU-only) as well as OpenCL accelerated (CPU + GPU) performance. We benchmarked select PCs for the OpenCL accelerated performance in all three usage scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU in the system. Most of the PCs in our comparison list are equipped with anaemic Atom processors, and the Core m3-6Y30 manages to easily better them in performance despite the form factor limitation.

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Home OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Creative OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Work OpenCL

Miscellaneous Futuremark Benchmarks

Futuremark PCMark 7 - PCMark Suite Score

Futuremark 3DMark 11 - Extreme Score

Futuremark 3DMark 11 - Entry Score

Futuremark 3DMark 2013 - Ice Storm Score

Futuremark 3DMark 2013 - Cloud Gate Score

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15

We have moved on from R11.5 to R15 for 3D rendering evaluation. CINEBENCH R15 provides three benchmark modes - OpenGL, single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of select PCs in all three modes provided us the following results.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Single Thread

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Multiple Threads

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - OpenGL

Introduction and Setup Impressions Performance Metrics - II
POST A COMMENT

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • Devo2007 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Hey, us phone guys are still waiting on the full Galaxy S7 review and the HTC 10. Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    We should start a timer. Reply
  • Jimster480 - Tuesday, July 05, 2016 - link

    I'd love a review on the HTC 10. Especially since I have had one for months now. Reply
  • Cygni - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    You should ask for your money back. Oh wait. Reply
  • abrowne1993 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Such a stupid argument every time I see it. If people stop coming to the site because of the lack of desired content, then the advertisers will stop paying. Reply
  • Impulses - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    So only the content you care about matters? Or you're the high arbiter over what content attracts more readers? Everyone and their mom has a GTX 1080 review, honestly I don't see what we're missing without AT's besides maybe some architecture insights...

    At least those whining about the S7/HTC 10 have more of point, AT's smartphone content has always been pretty unique and much more in depth than anyone else's... And the smartphone upgrade cycle/churn is faster than GPU's (which are constantly sold out right now anyway).
    Reply
  • abrowne1993 - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    I didn't make any mention of the content I wanted. I'm speaking for every unanswered complaint. Reply
  • Cygni - Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - link

    And that would be AnandTech's problem, not yours. Nobody cares what articles you think they should or shouldn't produce to get advertisers. Reply
  • ddriver - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    Instead of asking my money back I am simply not giving it. AT is not whitelisted in my ad blocker. And with the way it handles ads they are not simply hidden, they aren't loaded to begin with. Reply
  • wolfemane - Monday, June 27, 2016 - link

    The adds on this site are getting way out of hand, Now the promoted stories bullahiat at the end of the article with no relevance to the site itself. Absolutely horrible. I can barely view the site on a mobile device anymore. Time to find an ad blocker for mobile? I need to find one. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now