First Thoughts

Bringing our first look at AMD’s new architecture to a close, it’s exciting to see the field shape up for the FinFET generation. After over four years since the last great node transition, we once again are making a very welcome jump to a new manufacturing process, bringing us AMD’s Polaris.

AMD learned a lot from the 28nm generation – and more often than not the hard way – and they have put those lessons to good use in Polaris. Polaris’s power efficiency has been greatly increased thanks to a combination of GlobalFoundries 14nm FinFET process and AMD’s own design choices, and as a result, compared to AMD’s last-generation parts, Polaris makes significant strides where it needs to. And this goes not just for energy efficiency, but overall performance/resource efficiency as well.

Because AMD is launching with a mainstream part first they don’t get to claim to be charting any new territory on absolute performance. But by being the first vendor to address the mainstream market with a FinFET-based GPU, AMD gets the honor of redefining the price, performance, and power expectations of this market. And the end result is better performance – sometimes remarkably so – for this high volume market.

Relative to last-generation mainstream cards like the GTX 960 or the Radeon R9 380, with the Radeon RX 480 we’re looking at performance gains anywhere between 45% and 70%, depending on the card, the games, and the memory configuration. As the mainstream market was last refreshed less than 18 months ago, the RX 480 generally isn’t enough to justify an upgrade. However if we extend the window out to cards 2+ years old to things like the Radeon R9 280 and GeForce GTX 760, then we have a generational update and then-some. AMD Pitcairn users (Radeon HD 7800, R9 270) should be especially pleased with the progress AMD has made from one mainstream GPU to the next.

Looking at the overall performance picture, averaged across all of our games, the RX 480 lands a couple of percent ahead of NVIDIA’s popular GTX 970, and similarly ahead of AMD’s own Radeon R9 390, which is consistent with our performance expectations based on AMD’s earlier hints. RX 480 can't touch GTX 1070, which is some 50% faster, but then it's 67% more expensive as well.

Given the 970/390 similarities, from a price perspective this means that 970/390 performance has come down by around $90 since these cards were launched, from $329 to $239 for the more powerful RX 480 8GB, or $199 when it comes to 4GB cards. In the case of the AMD card power consumption is also down immensely as well, in essence offering Hawaii-like performance at around half of the power. However against the GTX 970 power consumption is a bit more of a mixed bag – power consumption is closer than I would have expected under Crysis 3 –  and this is something to further address in our full review.

Finally, when it comes to the two different memory capacities of the RX 480, for the moment I’m leaning strongly towards the 8GB card. Though the $40 price increase represents a 20% price premium, history has shown that when mainstream cards launch at multiple capacities, the smaller capacity cards tend to struggle far sooner than their larger counterparts. In that respect the 8GB RX 480 is far more likely to remain useful a couple of years down the road, making it a better long-term investment.

Wrapping things up then, today’s launch of the Radeon RX 480 puts AMD in a good position. They have the mainstream market to themselves, and RX 480 is a strong showing for their new Polaris architecture. AMD will have to fend off NVIDIA at some point, but for now they can sit back and enjoy another successful launch.

Meanwhile we’ll be back in a few days with our full review of the RX 480, so be sure to stay tuned.

Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

449 Comments

View All Comments

  • Yojimbo - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    I don't think it has to do with objectivity, it has to do with relevance. The relevance of a review probably goes down quickly after release date. AT dropped the ball on 1080 and 1070. They don't want to drop the ball on the RX 480 as well.

    I understand your concern but I think unless there is a consistent bias towards AMD it's misplaced. This is just a single matter of practicality. I definitely can see being (and am myself) annoyed by the 1080 and 1070 reviews taking so long.
  • HollyDOL - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    Um, not bias towards AMD, but rather they skip on biggest gpu performance jump in years and rather focus on card with medium performance (although, admittedly likely with biggest FPS/$ leap in years). I would be equally disturbed if the GTX-1080 perf bar card was released by AMD and they just skip it. Skipping Skylake cpu line would have prolly smaller impact than this technology wise.
  • Yojimbo - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    It's taking them entirely too long to get it out the door, but they aren't just skipping it. It's coming, so Ryan says.
  • HOOfan 1 - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    So, my burning question is.....did sacrificing your blood make the card any faster?
  • Mr Perfect - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    Will the 1070 be reviewed in the 1080 article too? Or is that coming later?
  • bill44 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    I hope I'm wrong about this, but there wont be a full FULL review until it includes the audio architecture (inc. sampling rates supported).
    It will be totaly game orientated, with barely a mention of madvr performance and decoding/encoding capabilities. Just like all the other reviews.

    As I said, I hope I'm wrong about this, and it will be a FULL review.
  • Sandcat - Tuesday, July 19, 2016 - link

    20 days later and still waiting for the RX 480.

    Stop lying, you aren't doing the 1080/1070 at all.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    There are plenty of decent reviews on the GTX 1080 already.
  • idris - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    I'm wondering how 1070FE benches were added to this "preview"?! Disappointed with AT..
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    Just so it's noted, 1070FE benchmarks have been in Bench since late May.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now