The dominance of the smartphone market by Apple and Samsung is being challenged by several Chinese brands that are delivering surprisingly well-featured phones for a fraction of the price. Meizu, one of the smaller Chinese OEMs based on sales volume, trails Huawei, OPPO, and Xiaomi in market share, but is gradually building its brand centered around design and build quality. 

The Meizu PRO 5 has been available for some time now, and has even been supplanted by the PRO 6 as the company's flagship device, but Meizu plans to continue selling the PRO 5 alongside the newer version for the foreseeable future at a reduced price. The PRO 5 itself follows the MX5 and is the successor to the MX4 Pro, adopting a new naming convention that further separates it from the midrange MX series.

Besides Samsung, Meizu is one of the few OEMs to use Samsung LSI’s Exynos SoCs, and the PRO 5 is the only other phone outside of Samsung’s more expensive Note5 and Galaxy S6 family to specifically use the Exynos 7420. Introduced in 2015, the Exynos 7420 is notable for being the first commercially available mobile SoC to use FinFET technology, which has less leakage than planar transistor technologies and higher subthreshold swing enabling lower overall power consumption. The 7420’s octa-core CPU—consisting of four higher-performing Cortex-A57 cores running at up to 2.1GHz and four lower-performing but lower-power Cortex-A53 cores running at up to 1.5GHz—and Mali-T760MP8 GPU are manufactured on Samsung’s 14nm LPE process.

The PRO 5 comes in two different configurations: one with 3GB of LPDDR4 RAM and 32GB of UFS 2.0 NAND and one that expands memory and internal storage to 4GB and 64GB, respectively. Both configurations support microSD cards to further expand storage.

Meizu 5 Series
  Meizu PRO 5 Meizu MX5
SoC Samsung Exynos 7420

4x Cortex-A57 @ 2.1GHz
4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz
Mali-T760MP8 @ 772MHz
MediaTek Helio X10
(MT6795)

8x Cortex-A53 @ 2.2GHz
PowerVR G6200 @ 700MHz+
RAM 3GB / 4GB LPDDR4-3104 3GB LPDDR3-1600
NAND 32GB / 64GB (UFS 2.0)
+ microSD
16GB / 32GB / 64GB (eMMC 5)
Display 5.7-inch 1920x1080 SAMOLED 5.5-inch 1920x1080 SAMOLED
Dimensions 156.7 x 78.0 x 7.5 mm
168 grams
149.9 x 74.7 x 7.6 mm
149 grams
Modem Samsung Shannon 333
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 6)

FDD-LTE / TD-LTE / TD-SCDMA / WCDMA / GSM
MediaTek (Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 4)

FDD-LTE / TD-LTE / TD-SCDMA / WCDMA / GSM
(Chinese Bands)
SIM Size 2x NanoSIM (dual standby) 2x NanoSIM (dual standby)
Front Camera 5MP, 1/5" OmniVision OV5670, 1.12μm, f/2.0 5MP, f/2.0
Rear Camera 21.16MP, 1/2.4” Sony IMX230 Exmor RS, 1.12µm pixels, f/2.2, PDAF + Laser AF, HDR, dual-tone LED flash 20.7MP, 1/2.3” Sony IMX220 Exmor RS, 1.2µm pixels, f/2.2, Laser AF, HDR, dual-tone LED flash
Battery 3050 mAh (11.59 Wh)
non-replaceable
3150 mAh (11.97 Wh)
non-replaceable
Connectivity 802.11b/g/n/ac, BT 4.1 LE, NFC, GPS/GNSS, USB 2.0 Type-C 802.11b/g/n/ac, BT 4.1 LE, GPS/GNSS, microUSB 2.0
Launch OS Android 5.1 with Meizu FlymeOS 5.1 Android 5.0 with Meizu FlymeOS 4.5
Launch Price
(No Contract)
¥2799 / ¥3099
$438 / $485 USD
¥1799 / ¥1999 / ¥2399
$290 / $320 / $386 USD

The Meizu PRO 5 uses a 21MP Sony IMX230 Exmor RS sensor for the rear camera, the same sensor the Moto X Pure Edition uses, paired with a dual-tone LED flash. It also includes a hybrid autofocus system that combines the strengths of laser, phase detection (PDAF), and traditional contrast detection methods—an uncommon feature, especially at this price point—which should give the PRO 5 excellent focusing performance in a variety of lighting conditions. The PRO 5’s rear camera does not support HDR when recording video or offer a 1080p60 recording mode, which is disappointing, but it does record 4K video using the newer H.265 codec, which is something even the most expensive flagships do not support.

Along with the Exynos 7420 SoC, Meizu is also using Samsung’s Shannon 333 baseband processor that supports GSM/EDGE (900/1800/1900 MHz), WCDMA (bands 1/2/5/8), and TD-SCDMA (bands 34/39), but not CDMA2000. It also supports Category 6 LTE speeds up to 300 Mb/s down and 50 Mb/s up with carrier aggregation. The PRO 5’s LTE support is primarily focused on its Chinese home market offering FDD-LTE (bands 1/3/7) and TD-LTE (bands 38/39/40/41). For our readers in the U.S., the PRO 5 will operate on AT&T’s and T-Mobile’s 3G/4G UMTS/HSPA+ networks, but there’s no LTE support.

The PRO 5’s card tray accepts one NanoSIM and one microSD card or two NanoSIM cards. When using both SIM slots, it’s possible to select which one will support 2G/3G/4G networks for voice and data and which one will be for GSM voice only. The slots are Dual Active, meaning you can have two different phone numbers active at the same time, which is useful when using a single phone for both personal and business use or when traveling abroad.

Unlike many other flagship phones that have different hardware models with frequency support tailored to specific regions or carriers, there’s only one model of the PRO 5. Meizu does have two different versions of its operating system, however; there’s a generic international version that comes with Google’s apps and better language support and a Chinese version that lacks Google’s apps but comes with additional apps and services for Chinese customers.

Design

The PRO 5 adopts the same clean design language, materials, and construction techniques used in the MX5. The aluminum chassis has a fine sandblasted finish and generously radiused corners, giving it a comfortable in-hand feel that is very similar to that of an iPhone. The PRO 5 is also nearly the same size as an iPhone 6s Plus despite its larger screen. Compared to the Moto X Pure Edition and Nexus 6P, which both have 5.7-inch screens, the PRO 5 is a little larger than the Moto X overall and essentially the same width and thickness as the Nexus 6P, but comes in 2.6 mm shorter. The PRO 5 is lighter than all three (iPhone 6s Plus, Moto X Pure Edition, Nexus 6P), but still has enough heft and stiffness to give it an aura of quality.

The front is covered in edge-to-edge glass with a small radius around the perimeter where it blends into the polished, chamfered edge of the aluminum chassis. I’m not sure to what specification the aluminum is heat treated, but the used review unit we received already had many fine scratches on this polished chamfer, implying the metal may be a little soft and prone to scratching. Thankfully, the black border around the 5.7-inch screen is very thin, and the bezels along the sides are also reasonably thin.

Centered above the screen is the phone’s earpiece, whose small size relative to the rest of the phone makes it difficult to hear phone conversations sometimes if it’s not aligned perfectly with the ear. This is an issue I’ve noticed on other phablets too, most notably the iPhone 6s Plus. The ambient light/proximity sensor and front-facing camera are both positioned to the right of the earpiece, with the camera furthest from center. A white notification LED is hidden just to the left of the earpiece.

There’s a physical home button below the screen that also functions as a touch-based fingerprint sensor using Meizu’s mTouch 2.1 technology. The capacitive sensor is supplied by Fingerprint Cards, and works quite well. It has no issues with changes in finger orientation or position, assuming you’ve done your part during the setup process, and even handles mild changes in dampness and temperature. Fingerprint recognition also occurs very quickly. The pill-shaped button itself is surrounded by a polished accent ring, and while it does not feel mushy, it does not provide a positive click either.

The rounded edges flow smoothly into the phone’s back, improving comfort. A 3.5 mm headphone jack and secondary microphone for noise cancellation are located on the top edge, while the primary microphone and single, downward-firing speaker flank a USB Type-C port on the bottom. There’s a card tray on the left edge that can hold either two NanoSIM cards or one NanoSIM and one microSD card. The power button and single-piece volume rocker sit just above the midpoint on the right edge inside a polished groove. The buttons depress with a solid click, but they are not held firmly in place; there’s just a hint of free play.

The prominent feature on the back is the large, circular surround for the rear camera. Located near the top edge, its polished metal ring and sapphire protective lens protrude from the back, but not enough to catch on things when slipping it into a pocket or purse. Just below the camera is a flush-fitting, pill-shaped module for the dual-tone flash and laser autofocus system.

In place of the plastic antenna lines we usually see on all-metal phones, the PRO 5 has polished slots machined into the chassis. These are purely decorative, however, because the antennas are actually hidden behind plastic inserts in the upper and lower portions of the back. The inserts are then painted to match the look and feel of the chassis’ metallic finish. Even though the color does not match exactly in certain lighting conditions, this method of hiding the antennas is less controversial than the method used by the LG G5.

The PRO 5 comes in four different color combinations, including silver with white front like our review unit, silver with black front, gray with black front, and gold with white front. None of these colors, like the phone’s aesthetic, are flashy or cheap looking. Instead, the PRO 5 has a clean, tasteful appearance not unlike many other metal phones.

Display
Comments Locked

80 Comments

View All Comments

  • Azurael - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    "The other four phones in this roundup all have OIS and lower resolution sensors. The Mate 8 uses a 16MP Sony IMX298 Exmor RS sensor, while the iPhone 6s Plus, Nexus 6P, and Galaxy S7 all use different 12MP Sony sensors."

    I had to keep going over that that to make sure I wasn't misreading. I'm fairly certain the Nexus 6P doesn't have OIS...
  • Matt Humrick - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    You're right. The Nexus 6P does not have OIS. I've updated the paragraph in the review.
  • Spectrophobic - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I almost thought Anandtech will finally include audio measurements on their phone reviews...
    Not really a fan of subjectively describing the sound of DACs and amps.
  • Impulses - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    There's a place for both IMO, numbers will never tell the whole story when it comes to audio gear, at least not until we get a lot better at measuring things AND interpreting measurements. Review sites like Innerfidelity have proven this time and again IMO...

    FWIW AT did include audio measurements for a brief stint when they had some loaner gear, but they don't have access to it anymore and even if they did not every smartphone reviewer would... It's definitely something I'd love to see but the logistics seem tough to figure out.
  • paradox_cat - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    can we please have a HTC 10 review? I'd be interested particularly to see how the sound quality on that compares to this Meizu Pro 5
  • Badelhas - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I would love to read AnandTechs detailed and rigorous full review of the HTC 10 as well but I still like to see these Chinese smartphones reviews as well. Just because I can't buy them except if I import them dosent mean that are a very important part of the competition
  • BMNify - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    Thanks for the review Matt, waiting for Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and and Mi5. Also try to get the samples for LeEco Le Max2 and LeEco Le2.

    We are getting all these interesting phones here in India at awesome prices and need a good English review site and you already know you have a sizable Indian readership. Besides, These companies are launching in new markets every few months, so the readership for these devices will only increase in the future.
  • Valantar - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    Another more or less baffling phone review from AnandTech. Not that it isn't slightly interesting to read about uncommon devices and new configurations of known hardware, but given that AT is still missing reviews of all current high end phones save the G5 and the latest iPhone, this is an odd one.

    Especially given that this device - as stated in the review - won't be very relevant outside of China due to lack of LTE support, this makes me wonder if AT is under some sort of pressure to grow their reader base in China/eastern Asia.

    Sure, S7 reviews are a dime a dozen, but none with the technical knowledge and depth of AT reviews. I also get that most AT editors work part time alongside other, time-consuming engagements (like studies), but that's not really an excuse for ever-increasing lateness. If your current editors are overworked, hire more.
  • m0rdy - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I really don't mind that anandtech's reviews are late, because they're more in depth than any other reviews. Display and colors are SO important to a smartphone, but NO ONE ELSE seems to recognise it and test it as well as Anandtech (not even the manufacturers) ! That's what keeps me coming here. I only wish that the breadth of reviews were greater (i.e. more smartphones)
  • fuicharles - Sunday, June 26, 2016 - link

    I also don't mind that anadtech review being late, given it is more in depth, but please don't be too late.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now